Summary
Aspects of visual optics were investigated in the American toad (Bufo americanus). The development of the refractive state of the eye during metamorphosis was followed with IR photoretinoscopy. Frozen sections documented the changes in optical parameters before and after metamorphosis. There is a difference in light sensitivity between juvenile and adult toads. Binocular accommodation in adult toads was observed.
-
1.
IR photoretinoscopic measurements showed that the refractive state of the eye changed very rapidly during metamorphosis, about 10D/h while the animal entered the terrestrial habitat.
-
2.
Frozen sections showed that the almost spherical lens in a tadpole eye had flattened in a just metamorphosed toad's eye while at the same time the distance of the lens to the retina had decreased. However, the morphological measurements were not sufficiently sensitive to record the relatively small changes in ocular dimensions that were responsible for the rapid changes in refractive state during metamorphosis.
-
3.
Schematic eyes, with homogeneous and non homogeneous lenses, were constructed for tadpoles, juvenile toads, and adult toads.
-
4.
Nonparaxial raytracing studies in schematic eyes suggested that the lenses of animals of the three developmental stages tadpole, juvenile toad, and adult are not homogeneous but have a refractive index gradient. The raytracing studies indicated that the refractive index gradient is different for the different developmental stages, being highest in the tadpole lens.
-
5.
The observations of toads during feeding behavior at different light levels showed an increased light sensitivity in the adult nocturnal toads in contrast to the juvenile animals, which are diurnal. The increased light sensitivity could partly be explained with an increase in aperture and an increase in red rod outer segments. To fully explain the higher light sensitivity in adult toads, changes in neuronal parameters had to be assumed.
-
6.
Retinoscopic measurements of the resting refractive state in the adult toad showed a hyperopic defocus of about +8D. By subtracting the measurement artefact for retinoscopy, the true resting focus was found to be nearly emmetropic.
-
7.
The amount of natural accommodation in adult toads during normal feeding behavior was investigated with IR photoretinoscopy. Binocular accommodation of about 8D was observed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Abbreviations
- D :
-
Diopter
- IR :
-
infrared light
- LED :
-
light emitting diode
- ROS :
-
red rod outer segments
- SF :
-
shape factor
References
Beer T (1898) Die Akkommodation des Auges bei den Amphibien. Pflügers Arch Ges Physiol 73:501–534
Birukow G (1950) Vergleichende Untersuchungen über das Helligkeits- und Farbensehen bei Amphibien. Z Vergl Physiol 32:348–382
Bowmaker JK (1977) The visual pigments, oil droplets and spectral sensitivity of the pigeon. Vision Res 17:1129–1138
Bowmaker JK, Dartnall HJA (1980) Visual pigments of rods and cones in a human retina. J Physiol (Lond) 298:501–511
Bowmaker JK, Martin GR (1978) Visual pigments and colour vision in a nocturnal bird,Strix aluco (Tawny owl). Vision Res 18:1125–1130
Brahma SK, Bours J (1972) Thin layer isoelectric focusing of the soluble lens extracts from larval stages and adultXenopus laevis. Exp Eye Res 13:309–314
Collett TS (1977) Stereopsis in toads. Nature 267:349–351
Crescitelli F (1958) The natural history of visual pigments. In: Newburgh RW (ed) Photobiology, Biology Colloquium, Oregon State College, Corvallis, pp 30–51
Davson H (1984) Vegetative physiology and biochemistry. vol IA In: Davson H (ed) The eye. Academic Press, London
Douglas RH, Collett TS, Wagner HJ (1986) Accommodation in anuran Amphibia and its role in depth vision. J Comp Physiol A 158:133–143
Doyle MJ, Maclean N (1978) Biochemical changes in developmentally retardedXenopus laevis. I. The lens crystallin transition. J Embryol Exp Morphol 46:215–255
Duke-Elder S (1958) The eye in evolution. (System of ophthalmology, vol I) Henry Kimpton, London
Eibl-Eibesfeldt I (1967) Nahrungserwerb und Beuteschema der Erdkröte. Behavior 4:1–35
Eikmanns KH (1955) Verhaltensphysiologische Untersuchungen über den Beutefang und das Bewegungssehen der Erdkröte (Bufo bufo L.). Z Tierpsych 12:229–253
Fisher LF (1972) Changes during maturation and metamorphosis in the synaptic organization of the tadpole retina inner plexiform layer. Nature 235:391–393
Glickstein M, Millodot M (1970) Retinoscopy and eye size. Science 168:605–606
Gordon J, Hood DC (1976) Anatomy and physiology of the frog retina. In: Fite K (ed) The amphibian visual system. Academic Press, New York, pp 29–86
Hess C von (1911) Beiträge zur vergleichenden Akkommodationslehre. Zool Jahrb 30:339–359
Heuscer H von (1956) Zum geruchlichen Beutefinden und Gähnen der Kreuzkröte (Bufo calamita Laur.). Z Tierpsychol 15:94–98
Hinsehe G (1935) Ein Schnappreflex nach Nichts bei Anuren. Zool Anz 3:113–122
Hirschberg I (1882) Zur Dioptrik und Ophthalmoskopie der Fisch- und Amphibienaugen. Arch Anat Physiol Abt Physiol 1882:493–526
Howland HC (1985) Optics of photoretinoscopy: results from raytracing. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 62:614–620
Ingle DJ (1968) Visual releasers of prey catching behavior in frogs and toads. Brain Behav Evol 1:500–518
Ingle DJ (1976) Spatial vision in anurans. In: Fite K (ed) The amphibian visual system. Academic Press, New York, pp 119–149
Jordan M, Luthardt G, Meyer-Naujoks Chr, Roth G (1980) The role of eye accommodation in the depth perception of common toads. Z Naturforsch 35c:851–852
Koneff (1938) Mallory Heidenhain's azan stain. In: Humason GL (ed) Animal tissue techniques. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, pp 163–165
Krüger H, Moser EA (1971) Refraktion und Abbildungsgesetze des Froschauges. Pflügers Arch 326:334–852
Larsen LO, Pedersen JN (1982) The snapping response of the toad,Bufo bufo, towards prey dummies at very low light intensities. Amph Rept 2:321–327
Manteuffel G, Wess O, Himstedt W (1977) Measurements of the dioptric apparatus in amphibian eyes and calculations of the visual acuity in water and in air. Zool Jb Physiol 81:395–406
Martin GR (1982) An owl's eye: schematic optics and visual performance inStrix aluco L. J Comp Physiol 145:341–349
Millodot M (1971) Measurement of the refractive state of the eye in frogs (Rana pipiens). Rev Can Biol 30:249–252
Millodot M (1974) Optical measurement of the refraction of the eyes in frogs (Rana pipiens). Pflügers Arch 351:173–175
Moser EA, Krüger H (1972) Retinoscopic and neurophysiological refractometry inRana temporaria. Pflügers Arch 335:235–242
Muntz WRA, Reuter T (1966) Visual pigments and spectral sensitivity inRana temporaria and other European tadpoles. Vision Res 6:601–618
Pont JS du, de Groot PJ (1976) A schematic dioptric apparatus for the frog's eye (Rana esculenta). Vision Res 16:803–810
Schaeffel F, Howland HC (1987) Corneal accommodation in chick and pigeon. J Comp Physiol A 160:375–384
Sivak JG, Warburg MR (1980) Optical metamorphosis of the eye ofSalamandra salamandra. Can J Zool 58:2059–2064
Taigen TL, Pough FH (1981) Activity metabolism of the toad (Bufo americanus): ecological consequenes of ontogenetic change. J Comp Physiol 144:247–252
Tretjakoff D (1913) Zur Anatomie des Auges der Kröte. Z Wiss Zool 80:327–359
Tsukamoto Y (1987) Morphometrical features of rod outer segments in relation to visual acuity and sensitivity in the retina ofRana catesbeiana. Zool Sci 4:233–242
Walls GL (1942) The vertebrate eye and its adaptive radiation. Hafner Publishing Co., New York, London
Werner C, Himstedt W (1984) Eye accommodation during prey capture behavior in salamanders (Salamandra salamandra L.). Behav Brain Res 12:69–73
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mathis, U., Schaeffel, F. & Howland, H.C. Visual optics in toads (Bufo americanus). J. Comp. Physiol. 163, 201–213 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00612429
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00612429