Summary
The acoustical properties of the external ear of the barn owl (Tyto alba) were studied by measuring sound pressure in the ear canal and outer ear cavity. Under normal conditions, pressure amplification by the external ear reaches about 20 dB between 3–9 kHz but decreases sharply above 10 kHz. The acoustic gain curve of the outer ear cavity alone is close to that of a finite-length exponential horn between 1.2–13 kHz with maximum gain reaching 20 dB between 5–9 kHz. Pressure gain by the facial ruff produces a maximum of 12 dB between 5–8 kHz and decreases rapidly above 9 kHz.
The directional sensitivity of the external ear was obtained from pressure measurements in the ear canal. Directivity of the major lobe is explained, to a first approximation, by the sound diffraction properties of a circular aperture. Aperture size is based on the average radius (30 mm) of the open face of the ruff. Above 5 kHz, the external ear becomes highly directional and there is a 26° disparity in elevation between the acoustic axis of the left and right ear. In azimuth, directivity patterns are relocated closer to the midline as frequency increases and the acoustic axis moves at a rate of 20°/octave between 2–13 kHz. Movement of the axis can be explained, to a first approximation, by the acoustical diffraction properties of an obliquely truncated horn, due to the asymmetrical shape of the outer ear cavity.
The directional sensitivity of the barn owl ear was studied by recording cochlear microphonic (CM) potentials from the round window membrane. Between 3–9 kHz, CM directivity patterns are clearly different to the directivity patterns of the external ear; CM directionality is abruptly lost above 10 kHz. Above 5 kHz, CM directivity patterns are characterized by an elongated major lobe containing the CM axis, forming a tilted band of high amplitude but low directionality (CM axial plane), closely bordered by minima or nulls. The highest directionality is found in theCM directional plane, approximately perpendicular to the CM axial plane. The left and right ear axial planes are symmetrical about the interaural midline (tilted 12° to the right of the midline of the head) and inclined by an average of 60° to the left and right respectively. In azimuth, the CM axis moves towards the midline at a rate of 37°/octave as frequency increases from 2–9 kHz, crossing into contralateral space near 7 kHz. In the CM directional plane, the directivity of the major lobe suggests that a pressure gradient may occur at the TM. The region of frontal space mapped by movement of the CM axis in azimuth closely matches the angle of sound incidence which would be expected to produce the maximum driving pressure at the TM. It is suggested that acoustical interference at the TM results from sound transmission through the interaural canal and therefore the ear is inherently directional. It is proposed that ear directionality in the barn owl may be explained by the combined effect of sound diffraction by the outer ear cavity and a pressure gradient at the TM.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Abbreviations
- CM :
-
cochlear microphonic
- RMS :
-
root mean square
- SPL :
-
sound pressure level
- TM :
-
tympanic membrane
References
Autrum H (1942) Schallempfang bei Tier und Mensch. Naturwissenschaften 30:69–85
Beranek LL (1954) Acoustics. McGraw-Hill, New York
Chung S-H, Pettigrew A, Anson M (1978) Dynamics of the amphibian middle ear. Nature 272:142–147
Coles RB, Guppy A (1986) Biophysical aspects of directional hearing in the Tammar wallaby (Macropus eugenii). J Exp Biol 121:371–394
Coles RB, Lewis DB, Hill KG, Hutchings ME, Gower DM (1980) Directional hearing in the Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) II. Cochlear physiology. J Exp Biol 86:153–170
Fletcher NH, Thwaites S (1979) Physical models for the analysis of acoustical systems in biology. Q Rev Biophys 12:25–65
Guppy A, Coles RB (1988) Acoustical and neural aspects of hearing in the Australian gleaning batsMacroderma gigas andNyctophilus gouldi. J Comp Physiol 162:653–668
Hill KG, Lewis DB, Hutchings ME, Coles RB (1980) Directional hearing in the Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). I. Acoustic properties of the auditory system. J Exp Biol 86:135–151
Knudsen EI (1980) Sound localization in birds. In: Popper AN, Fay RR (eds) Comparative studies of hearing in vertebrates. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 289–322
Knudsen EI, Konishi M (1978a) A neural map of auditory space in the owl. Science 200:795–797
Knudsen EI, Konishi M (1978b) Space and frequency are represented separately in auditory midbrain of the owl. J Neurophysiol 41:870–884
Knudsen EI, Konishi M (1979) Mechanisms of sound localization in the barn owl (Tyto alba). J Comp Physiol 133:13–21
Knudsen EI, Konishi M (1980) Monaural occlusion shifts receptive field locations of auditory midbrain units in the owl. J Neurophysiol 44:687–695
Knudsen EI, Konishi M, Pettigrew JD (1977) Receptive fields of auditory neurons in the owl. Science 198:1278–1280
Knudsen EI, Blasdel GG, Konishi M (1979) Sound localization by the barn owl (Tyto alba) measured with the search coil technique. J Comp Physiol 133:1–11
Konishi M (1973a) How the owl tracks its prey. Am Sci 61:414–424
Konishi M (1973b) Locatable and nonlocatable acoustic signals for barn owls. Am Nat 107:775–785
Konishi M (1983) Neuroethology of acoustic prey localization in the barn owl. In: Huber F, Markl H (eds) Neuroethology and behavioural physiology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 303–317
Lewis DB, Coles RB (1980) Sound localization in birds. Trends Neurosci 3:102–105
Michelsen A (1979) Insect ears as mechanical systems. Am Sci 67:696–706
Michelsen A, Nocke H (1974) Biophysical aspects of sound communication in insects. Adv Insect Physiol 10:247–296
Middlebrooks JC, Pettigrew JD (1981) Functional classes of neurons in the primary auditory cortex of the cat distinguished by sensitivity to sound location. J Neurosci 1:107–120
Moiseff A, Konishi M (1981a) Nevronal and behavioural sensitivity to binaural time differences in the owl. J Neurosci 1:40–48
Moiseff A, Konishi M (1981b) The owl's interaural pathway is not involved in sound localization. J Comp Physiol 144:299–304
Norberg RA (1968) Physical factors in directional hearing inAegolius funereus (Linné) (Strigiformes), with special reference to the significance of the asymmetry of the external ears. Ark Zool 20:181–204
Norberg RA (1970) Hunting technique of Tengmalm's owlAegolius funereus. Ornis Scand 1:51–64
Norberg RA (1977) Occurrence and independent evolution of bilateral ear asymmetry in owls and implications on owl taxonomy. Phil Trans R Soc Lond 280:375–408
Norberg RA (1978) Skull asymmetry, ear structure and function, and auditory localization in Tengmalm's owl,Aegolius funereus (Linné). Phil Trans R Soc Lond 282:325–410
Olson HF (1947) Acoustical engineering. Van Nostrand, New York
Payne RS (1971) Acoustic location of prey by barn owls (Tyto alba). J Exp Biol 54:535–573
Pettigrew A, Chung SH, Anson M (1978) Neurophysiological basis of directional hearing in Amphibia. Nature 272:138–142
Phillips DP, Calford MB, Pettigrew JD, Aitkin LM, Semple MN (1982) Directionality of sound pressure transformation at the cat's pinna. Hearing Res 8:13–28
Rosowski JJ, Saunders JC (1980) Sound transmission through the avian interaural pathways. J Comp Physiol 136:183–190
Schwartzkopff J (1962) Zur Frage des Richtungshörens von Eulen (Striges). Z Vergl Physiol 45:570–580
Stellbogen E (1930) Über das äußere und mittlere Ohr des Waldkauzes (Syrnium aluco L.). Z Morphol Ökol Tiere 19:687–731
Stresemann E (1934) Handbuch der Zoologie, vol 7, pt 2. Kükenthal W, Krumbach T (eds) De Gruyter, Leipzig pp 899
Tiedemann F (1810) Zoologie II, Anatomie und Naturgeschichte der Vögel. Landshut
Wada Y (1923) Beiträge zur vergleichenden Physiologie der Gehörorgane. Pflügers Arch 202:46–69
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Coles, R.B., Guppy, A. Directional hearing in the barn owl (Tyto alba). J. Comp. Physiol. 163, 117–133 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00612002
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00612002