Summary
In tethered flying house-flies (Musca domestica) visually induced turning reactions were monitored under open-loop conditions simultaneously with the spike activity of four types of steering muscles (M.b1, M.b2, M.I1, M.III1). Specific behavioral response components are attributed to the activity of particular muscles. Compensatory optomotor turning reactions to large-field image displacements mainly occur when the stimulus pattern oscillates at low frequencies. In contrast, turning responses towards objects are preferentially induced by motion of relatively small stimuli at high oscillation frequencies. The different steering muscles seem to be functionally specialized in that they contribute to the control of these behavioral responses in different ways. The muscles I1, III1 and b2 are preferentially active during small-field motion at high oscillation frequencies. They are much less active during small-field motion at low oscillation frequencies and large-field motion at all oscillation frequencies which were tested. M.b2 is most extreme in this respect. These steering muscles thus mediate mainly turns towards objects. In contrast, M.b1 responds best during large-field motion at low oscillation frequencies and, thus, is appropriate to control compensatory optomotor responses. However, the activity of this muscle is also strongly modulated during small-field motion at high oscillation frequencies and, therefore, may be involved also in the control of turns towards objects. These functional specializations of the different steering muscles in mediating different behavioral response components are related to the properties of two parallel visual pathways that are selectively tuned to large-field and small-field motion, respectively.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Abbreviations
- FD (cell):
-
figure detection (cell)
- HS (cell):
-
horizontal (cell)
References
Bausenwein B, Wolf R, Heisenberg M (1986) Genetic dissection of optomotor behavior inDrosophila melanogaster. Studies on wild-type and the mutant optomotor-blindH31. J Neurogenetics 3:87–109
Collett TS (1980a) Some operating rules for the optomotor system of a hoverfly during voluntary flight. J Comp Physiol 138:271–282
Collett TS (1980b) Angular tracking and the optomotor response. An analysis of visual reflex interaction in a hoverfly. J Comp Physiol 140:145–158
Egelhaaf M (1985a) On the neuronal basis of figure-ground discrimination by relative motion in the visual system of the fly. I. Behavioural constraints imposed on the neuronal network and the role of the optomotor system. Biol Cybern 52:123–140
Egelhaaf M (1985b) On the neuronal basis of figure-ground discrimination by relative motion in the visual system of the fly. II. Figure-Detection Cells, a new class of visual interneurones. Biol Cybern 52:195–209
Egelhaaf M (1985c) On the neuronal basis of figure-ground discrimination by relative motion in the visual system of the fly. III. Possible input circuitries and behavioural significance of the FD-Cells. Biol Cybern 52:267–280
Egelhaaf M (1987) Dynamic properties of two control systems underlying visually guided turning in house-flies. J Comp Physiol A 161:777–783
Egelhaaf M, Hausen K, Reichardt W, Wehrhahn C (1988) Visual course control in flies relies on neuronal computation of object and background motion. Trends Neurosci 11:351–358
Fermi G, Reichardt W (1963) Optomotorische Reaktionen der FliegeMusca domestica. Abhängigkeit der Reaktion von der Wellenlänge, der Geschwindigkeit, dem Kontrast und der mittleren Leuchtdichte bewegter periodischer Muster. Kybernetik 2:15–28
Geiger G, Nässei DR (1982) Visual processing of moving single objects and wide-field patterns in flies: Behavioural analysis after laser-surgical removal of interneurons. Biol Cybern 44:141–149
Götz KG (1964) Optomotorische Untersuchung des visuellen Systems einiger Augenmutanten der FruchtfliegeDrosophila. Kybernetik 2:77–92
Götz KG (1983a) Bewegungssehen und Flugsteuerung bei der FliegeDrosophila. In: Nachtigall W (ed) BIONA report. Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur Mainz, G. Fischer, Mainz Stuttgart New York, pp 21–34
Götz KG (1983b) Genetischer Abbau der visuellen Orientierung beiDrosophila. Verh Dtsch Zool Ges 76:83–99
Götz KG, Hengstenberg B, Biesinger R (1979) Optomotor control of wing beat and body posture inDrosophila. Biol Cybern 35:101–112
Hausen K (1981) Monocular and binocular computation of motion in the lobula plate of the fly. Verh Dtsch Zool Ges 74:49–70
Hausen K (1982a) Motion sensitive interneurons in the optomotor system of the fly. I. The horizontal cells: structure and signals. Biol Cybern 45:143–156
Hausen K (1982b) Motion sensitive interneurons in the optomotor system of the fly. II. The horizontal cells: receptive field organization and response characteristics. Biol Cybern 46:67–79
Hausen K (1984) The lobula-complex of the fly: Structure, function and significance in visual behaviour. In: Ali MA (ed) Photoreception and vision in invertebrates. Plenum Press, New York London, pp 523–559
Hausen K, Egelhaaf M (1989) Neural mechanisms of visual course control in insects. In: Stavenga D, Hardie R (eds) Facets of vision. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 391–424
Hausen K, Wehrhahn C (1983) Microsurgical lesion of horizontal cells changes optomotor yaw responses in the blowflyCalliphora erythrocephala. Proc R Soc Lond B 219:211–216
Hausen K, Wehrhahn C (in press) Neural circuits mediating visual flight in flies. I. Quantitative comparison of neural and behavioural response characteristics.
Hausen K, Wehrhahn C (in press) Neural circuits mediating visual flight in flies. II. Separation of two control systems.
Heide G (1971a) Die Funktion der nicht-fibrillären Flugmuskeln vonCalliphora. Teil 1: Lage, Insertionsstellen und Innervierungsmuster der Muskeln. Zool Jb Physiol 76:87–98
Heide G (1971b) Die Funktion der nicht-fibrillären Flugmuskeln vonCalliphora. Teil II: Muskuläre Mechanismen der Flugsteuerung und ihre nervöse Kontrolle. Zool Jb Physiol 76:99–137
Heide G (1975) Properties of a motor output system involved in the optomotor response in flies. Biol Cybern 20:99–112
Heide G (1983) Neural mechanisms of flight control in Diptera. In: Nachtigall W (ed) BIONA report. Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur Mainz, G. Fischer, Mainz Stuttgart New York, pp 35–52
Heisenberg M, Wolf R (1984) Vision inDrosophila. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Heisenberg M, Wolf R (1988) Reafferent control of optomotor yaw torque inDrosophila melanogaster. J Comp Physiol A 163:373–388
Hirth C (1981) Elektrophysiologische Untersuchungen über die Bildung der Impulsmuster in den neuromotorischen Systemen nicht-fibrillärer Flugmuskeln von Schmeißfliegen (Calliphora). Doctoral Dissertation, Universität Düsseldorf, FRG
Land MF, Collett TS (1974) Chasing behaviour of houseflies (Fannia canicularis). A description and analysis. J Comp Physiol 89:331–357
Nachtigall W (ed) (1983) BIONA report 1 and 2: Insect flight. Akademie der Wissenschaften Mainz, G. Fischer, Mainz, Stuttgart New York
Reichardt W (1986) Processing of optical information by the visual system of the fly. Vision Res 26:113–126
Reichardt W (1987) Evaluation of optical motion information by movement detectors. J Comp Physiol A 161:533–547
Reichardt W, Poggio T (1976) Visual control of orientation behaviour in the fly. Part I. A quantitative analysis. Q Rev Biophys 9:311–375
Reichardt W, Poggio T, Hausen K (1983) Figure-ground discrimination by relative movement in the visual system of the fly. Part II: Towards the neural circuitry. Biol Cybern 46 (Suppl):1–30
Spüler M (1980) Erregende und hemmende Wirkungen visueller Bewegungsreize auf das Flugsteuersystem von Fliegen — Elektrophysiologische und verhaltensphysiologische Untersuchungen anMusca undCalliphora. Doctoral Dissertation, Universität Düsseldorf, FRG
Spüler M, Heide G (1978) Simultaneous recordings of torque, thrust and muscle spikes from the flyMusca domestica during optomotor responses. Z Naturforsch 33c: 455–457
Wagner H (1986a) Flight performance and visual control of the flight of the free-flying housefly (Musca domestica).II. Pursuit of targets. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 312:533–579
Wagner H (1986b) Flight performance and visual control of flight of the free-flying housefly (Musca domestica). III. Interactions between angular movement induced by wide- and smallfield stimuli. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 312:581–595
Wehrhahn C (1985) Visual guidance of flies during flight. In: Kerkut GA, Gilbert LI (eds) Comprehensive insect physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology. Pergamon Press, Oxford New York Toronto Sydney Paris Frankfurt, pp 673–684
Wehrhahn C, Poggio T, Bülthoff H (1982) Tracking and chasing in houseflies (Musca). Biol Cybern 45:123–130
Zanker JM (1987) Über die Flugkrafterzeugung und Flugkraftsteuerung der FruchtfliegeDrosophila melanogaster. Doctoral Dissertation, Universität Tübingen, FRG
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Egelhaaf, M. Visual afferences to flight steering muscles controlling optomotor responses of the fly. J. Comp. Physiol. 165, 719–730 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00610871
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00610871