Summary
The activity of auditory receptor cells and prothoracic auditory neurons of the cricket,Gryllus bimaculatus, was recorded intracellularly while the animal walked on a sphere or while passive movement was imposed on a foreleg.
During walking the responses to simulated calling song is altered since (i) the auditory sensory cells and interneurons discharged impulses in the absence of sound stimuli (Figs. 1, 3) and (ii) the number of action potentials in response to sound is reduced in interneurons (Figs. 2, 3).
These two effects occurred in different phases of the leg movement during walking and therefore masked, suppressed or did not affect the responses to auditory stimuli (Figs. 3, 4). Hence there is a time window within which the calling song can be detected during walking (Fig. 5).
The extra excitation of receptors and interneurons is probably produced by vibration of the tympanum because (i) the excitation occurred at the same time as the leg placement (Fig. 4), (ii) during walking on only middle and hindlegs, no extra action potentials were observed (Fig. 6), (iii) in certain phases of passive movements receptor cells and interneurons were excited as long as the ipsilateral ear was not blocked (Figs. 8, 9).
Suppression of auditory responses seems to be peripheral as well as central in origin because (i) it occurred at particular phases during active and passive leg movements in receptor cells and interneurons (Figs. 1, 4, 9), (ii) it disappeared if the ear was blocked during passive leg movements (Fig. 9) and (iii) it persisted if the animal walked only on the middle and hind legs (Fig. 6).
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Boyan GS (1986) Modulation of auditory responsiveness in the locust. J Comp Physiol A 158:813–825
Daley DL, Delcomyn F (1980) Modulation of excitability of cockroach giant interneurons during walking. J Comp Physiol 138:231–251
Dambach M, Huber F (1974) Perception of substrate vibration in crickets. In: Schwartzkopff J (ed) Mechanoreception. Abh Rhein Westf Akad Wiss 53:262–280
Hedwig B (1986) On the role in stridulation of plurisegmental interneurons of the acridid grasshopperOmocestus viridulus. J Comp Physiol A 158:413–444
Hedwig B, Lang F, Elsner N (1987) Activation and modulation of locust auditory receptors by respiration and leg movement. In: Elsner N, Creutzfeldt O (eds) New frontiers in brain research. Thieme, Stuttgart New York, p 84
Heitler WJ (1983) Suppression of a locust visual interneuron during defensive kicking. J Exp Biol 104:203–215
Kämper G, Dambach M (1981) Response of the cercus-to-giant interneuron system in crickets to species specific song. J Comp Physiol 141:311–317
Kalmring K, Kaiser W, Otto C, Kühne R (1985) Coprocessing of vibratory and auditory information in the CNS of different tettigonids and locusts. In: Kalmring K, Elsner N (eds) Acoustic and vibrational communication in insects. Parey, Berlin, pp 193–202
Krasne FB, Bryan JS (1973) Habituation: regulation through resynaptic inhibition. Science 182:590–592
Kühne R, Silver S, Lewis B (1985) Processing of vibratory signals in the CNS of the cricket. In: Kalmring K, Elsner N (eds) Acoustic and vibrational communication in insects. Parey, Berlin Hamburg, pp 183–192
Laurent G, Richard D (1986) The organization and role during locomotion of the proximal musculature of the cricket foreleg. J Exp Biol 123:255–306
Michel K (1974) Das Tympanalorgan vonGryllus bimaculatus. Z Morphol Tiere 77:285–315
Müller-Preuss P, Ploog D (1981) Inhibition of auditory cortical neurons during phonation. Brain Res 215:61–76
Murphey RK, Palka J (1974) Efferent control of cricket giant fibres. Nature 248:249–251
Oldfield B, Kleindienst HU, Huber F (1986) Physiology and tonotopic organization of auditory receptors in the cricketGryllus bimaculatus. J Comp Physiol A 159:457–464
Orida N, Josephson RK (1978) Peripheral control of responsiveness to auditory stimuli in giant fibres of crickets and cockroaches. J Exp Biol 72:153–164
Pollack G, Henson OW (1973) Specialized functional aspects of the middle ear muscles in the bat,Chilonycteris parnelii. J Comp Physiol 84:167–174
Popov AV, Svetlogorskaja ID (1979) K waprossu ob efferentnom kontrolje ssluchowuich rezeptorow w timpanalnom organje sswertschkow Gryllus bimaculatus. Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR 246:1005–1007
Russel U, Roberts BL (1974) Active reduction of lateral-line sensitivity in swimming dogfish. J Comp Physiol 94:7–15
Schildberger K, Hörner M (1988) The function of auditory neurons in cricket phonotaxis. I. Influence of hyperpolarization of identified neurons on sound localization. J Comp Physiol A 163:621–631
Schmitz B, Scharstein H, Wendler G (1982) Phonotaxis inGryllus campestris. J Comp Physiol 148:431–444
Selverston AI, Kleindienst HU, Huber F (1985) Synaptic connectivity between cricket auditory interneurons as studied by selective photoinactivation. J Neurosci 5:1283–1292
Tomioka K, Yamaguchi T (1984) Response modification of cricket sensory interneurons during flight. Zool Sci 1:169–186
Weber T, Thorson J, Huber F (1981) Auditory behavior of the cricket. J Comp Physiol 141:215–232
Wiese K (1981) Influence of vibration on cricket hearing: interaction of low frequency vibration and acoustic stimuli in the omega neuron. J Comp Physiol 143:135–142
Wohlers DW, Huber F (1982) Processing of sound signals by six types of neurons in the prothoracic ganglion of the cricket. J Comp Physiol 146:161–173
Wolf H, Helversen O von (1986) ‘Switching-off’ of an auditory neuron during stridulation in the acridid grasshopperChorthippus biguttulus. J Comp Physiol A 158:861–871
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schildberger, K., Milde, J.J. & Hörner, M. The function of auditory neurons in cricket phonotaxis. J. Comp. Physiol. 163, 633–640 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00603847
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00603847