Summary
Fifty-two methylmethacrylate cranioplasties were performed on forty-seven patients over a five year period. Two cranioplasties became infected and required removal. The overall infection rate for methylmethacrylate cranioplasty was thus 2/52 or 3.8%. Both of these patients had bifrontal cranioplasties involving both orbital rims and the frontal sinus. The infection rate for those cranioplasties involving the frontal sinus was 2 of 9 or 22%. None of the 43 cranioplasties not involving the frontal sinus became infected.
Ten patients in this series had postoperative CT scans. Gas within the non-infected methylmethacrylate could simulate infection, making it difficult to diagnose cranioplasty infections by CT. Although certain CT changes, such as epidural air and soft tissue swelling, may be observed only with infected cranioplasties, the clinical picture is the only truly reliable indicator of infection.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Capanna AH (1980) A new method of cranioplasty. Surg Neurol 14:385–386
Beynon J, Slonim L, Kiss ZS, Morris C, Lau L (1984) CT appearance of a prosthetic methyl methacrylate mass mistaken for abscess. Radiology 150:506
Mason TO, Rose BS, Goodman JH (1985) Gas bubbles in polymethylmethacrylate cranioplasty simulating abscesses. AJNR 7: 829–831
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Benzel, E.C., Thammavaram, K. & Kesterson, L. The diagnosis of infections associated with acrylic cranioplasties. Neuroradiology 32, 151–153 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00588566
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00588566