Abstract
Toughness and mechanical property data are presented for a carboxyl-terminated acrylonitrile butadiene (CTBN) rubber-modified epoxy resin in the temperature range 20 to − 110° C. A toughening model based on ultimate strain capability and tear energy dissipation of the rubber, present as dispersed microscopic particles in an epoxy matrix, is used to explain the suppression of composite toughness (G Ic ) below − 20° C. The toughness loss is attributed to a glass transition in the rubber particles, and to a secondary transition in the epoxy resin, both occurring in the range − 40 to − 80° C. Strain-tofailure and modulus measurements on bulk rubber-epoxy compounds, formulated to simulate rubber particle compositions, confirm a decrease in rubber ductility coincident with the onset of composite toughness loss. An increase in rubber tear energy associated with its transition to a rigid state can explain the observation that even at low temperatures composite toughness generally remains significantly higher than that of pure epoxy. Although the low-temperature epoxy transition reduces molecular mobility in the matrix phase, residual ductility in, and energy dissipation by, the rubber particles determine the extent of composite toughness suppression. The low-temperature data bear out the particle stretching-tearing model for toughening.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
F. J. McGarry, A. M. Willner and J. N. Sultan, “Toughening of Glassy Crosslinked Polymers with Elastomer Inclusions”, Research Report R69-59, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA (1969).
W. D. Bascom, R. L. Cottington, R. L. Jones and P. Peyser, J. Appl. Polymer Sci. 19 (1975) 2545.
J. M. Scott and D. C. Phillips, J. Mater. Sci. 10 (1975) 551.
R. Drake and A. Siebert, SAMPE Quarterly 6 (4) (1975).
C. B. Bucknall, “Toughened Plastics” (Applied Science, London, 1975).
S. Kunz-Douglass, P. W. R. Beaumont and M. F. Ashby, J. Mater. Sci. 15 (1980) 1109.
W. D. Bascom and R. L. Cottington, J. Adhesion 7 (1976) 333.
C. B. Bucknall and R. R. Smith, Polymer 6 (1965) 437.
S. Newman and S. Strella, J. Appl. Polymer Sci. 9 (1965) 2297.
C. B. Bucknall and T. Yoshii, Third International Conference on Deformation, Yield and Fracture of Polymers, PRI, Paper 13, Churchill College Cambridge, UK, March 1976.
B. F. Goodrich Chemical Co. “Hycar Reactive Liquid Polymers”, Internal Sales Service Report, December, London, UK (1972).
A. R. Siebert, C. K. Riew and E. H. Rowe, private communication (1976).
S. C. Kunz, PhD thesis, University of Cambridge (1978).
A. G. Evans, Int. J. Fract. 9 (1973) 267.
R. S. Rivlin and A. G. Thomas, J. Polymer Sci. 10 (1953) 291.
J. A. Sayre, Sandia National Laboratories, private communication (1980).
R. G. C. Arridge and J. H. Speake, Polymer 13 (1972) 443.
L. R. G. Treloar, “The Physics of Rubber Elasticity” (Oxford University Press, London, 1949).
N. K. Kalfoglou and H. L. Williams, J. Appl. Polymer Sci. 17 (1973) 1377.
L. E. Nielsen, “Mechanical Properties of Polymers” (Reinhold, New York, 1962).
L. Mullins, Trans. Inst. Rubber Ind. 35 (1959) 213.
A. N. Gent, “Fracture”, Vol. 7, edited by H. Liebowitz (Academic Press, New York, 1972) pp. 315–50.
R. H. Beck, S. Gratch, S. Newman and K. C. Rusch, Polymer Letters 6 (1968) 707.
J. A. Schmitt, J. Appl. Polymer Sci. 12 (1968) 533.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kunz, S.C., Beaumont, P.W.R. Low-temperature behaviour of epoxy-rubber particulate composites. J Mater Sci 16, 3141–3152 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00540323
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00540323