Abstract
A review was undertaken of 360 patients undergoing elective left-sided colonic or rectal resections with primary anastomosis, under the care of one surgeon, over a nineteen year period. The incidence, aetiology and management of anastomotic leaks and strictures was studied and the role of proximal diverting colostomy considered. Perioperative mortality was 2.7%. The incidence of anastomotic leaks was 24.4%. Leaks were more common when anastomoses were low, were sutured or were constructed by trainees. Strictures developed in 5.8%. Local recurrence of tumour was the cause of 25% of these strictures. Anastomotic leakage was the principal cause of benign strictures; those developing in association with leaks were more likely to require surgical intervention. There was no evidence that delay in colostomy closure contributed to the development of benign anastomotic strictures. It was not possible to determine whether the presence of a colostomy affected the incidence of leaks but the local effects of such leaks were mitigated in patients with colostomies. Where a minor leak had occurred it was not necessary to wait for complete anastomotic healing before closing the colostomy. After major leaks, colostomy closure before complete healing was associated with further anastomotic problems in 16.0% of cases.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Everett WG, Friend PJ, Forty J (1986) Comparison of stapling and hand-suture for left-sided large bowel anastomosis. Br J Surg 73:345–348
Blamey SL, Lee PWR (1982) A comparison of circular stapling devices in colorectal anastomoses. Br J Surg 69:19–22
Goligher JC, Graham NG, De Dombal FT (1970) Anastomotic dehiscence after anterior resection of rectum and sigmoid. Br J Surg 57:109–118
Goligher JC, Lee PWR, Lintott DJ (1979) Experience with the russian Model 249 suture gun for anastomosis of the rectum. Sur Gynaecol Obstet 148:517–524
Brennan SS, Pickford IR, Evans M, Pollock AV (1982) Staples or sutures for colonic anastomoses — a controlled clinical trial. Br J Surg 69:722–724
Goligher JC, Lee PWR, Simpkins KC, Lintott DJ (1977) A controlled comparison of one- and two-layer techniques of suture for high and low colorectal anastomoses. Br J Surg 64:609–614
McGinn FP, Gartell PC, Clifford PC, Brunton FJ (1985) Staples or sutures for low colorectal anastomoses: a prospective randomised trial. Br J Surg 72:603–605
Goligher JC, Morris C, McAdam WAF, de Dombal FT, Johnston D (1970) A controlled trial of inverting versus everting intestinal suture in clinical large-bowel surgery. Br J Surg 57:817–822
Kirkegaard P, Christiansen J, Hjortrup A (1980) Anterior resection for mid-rectal cancer with the EEA stapling instrument. Am J Surg 140:312–314
Irvin TT, Goligher JC, Johnston D (1973) A randomised prospective clinical trial of single-layer and two-layer inverting intestinal anastomoses. Br J Surg 60:457–460
Matheson NA, Irving AD (1975) Single layer anastomosis after rectosigmoid resection. Br J Surg 62:239–242
Heald RJ, Leicester RJ (1981) The low stapled anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 24:437–444
Parks AG, Percy JP (1982) Resection and sutured colo-anal anastomosis for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 69:301–304
Steinhagen RM, Weakley FL (1985) Anastomosis to the rectum: operative experience. Dis Colon Rectum 28:105–109
Fielding LP, Stewart-Brown S, Hittinger R, Blesovsky L (1984) Covering stoma for elective anterior resection of the rectum: an outmoded operation? Am J Surg 147:524–530
Everett WG (1975) A comparison of one layer and two layer techniques for colorectal anastomosis. Br J Surg 62:134–140
Fielding LP, Stewart-Brown S, Blesovsky L, Kearney G (1980) Anastomotic integrity after operations for large bowel cancer: a multicentre study. Br Med J 281:411–414
Irvin TT, Goligher JC (1973) Aetiology of disruption of intestinal anastomoses. Br J Surg 60:461–464
Morgenstern L, Yamakawa T, Ben-Shoshan M, Lippman H (1972) Anastomotic leakage after low colorectal anastomosis. Am J Surg 123:104–109
Everett WG, Greatorex RA (1987) Colonic anastomosis — suture or staple? Trop Gastroenterol 8:195–203
Beart RW, Kelly KA (1981) Randomised prospective evaluation of the EEA stapler for colorectal anstomoses. Am J Surg 141:143–147
Trollope ML, Cohen RG, Lee RH, Cannon WB, Marzoni FA, Cressman RD (1986) A 7 year experience with low anterior sigmoid resections using the EEA stapler. Am J Surg 152:11–15
Gordon PH, Vasilevsky CA (1984) Experience with stapling in rectal surgery. Surg Clin North Am 64:555–566
Polglase AL, Hughes ESR, McDermott FT, Burke FR (1981) A comparison of end-to-end staple and suture colorectal anastomosis in the dog. Surg Ghnaecol Obstet 152:792–796
Accordi F, Sogno O, Carnioto S, Fabris G, Moschino P, Coan B, Carlon C (1987) Endoscopic treatment of stenosis following stapler anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 30:647–649
Kissin MW, Cox AG, Wilkins RA, Kark AE (1985) The fate of the EEA stapled anastomosis: A clinico-radiological study of 38 patients. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 67:20–22
Antonsen HK, Kronborg O (1987) Early complications after low anterior resection for rectal cancer using the EEA stapling device: a prospective trial. Dis Colon Rectum 30:579–583
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tuson, J.R.D., Everett, W.G. A retrospective study of colostomies, leaks and strictures after colorectal anastomosis. Int J Colorect Dis 5, 44–48 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00496150
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00496150