Abstract
A less analytic and more wholistic approach to philosophy, described as ‘best overall fit’ or ‘seeing how things all hang together,’ is defended in recent works by John Rawls and Richard Rorty and can usefully be applied to problems in philosophy of medicine. Looking at sickness and its impact upon the person as a central problem for philosophy of medicine, this approach discourages a search for necessary and sufficient conditions for being sick, and instead encourages a listing of “true and interesting observations” about sickness which reflect the convergence of a number of different viewpoints. Among the relevant viewpoints are other humanities disciplines besides philosophy and the social sciences. Literature, in particular, provides insights into the meaning and the uniqueness of episodes of sickness in a way that philosophers may otherwise fail to grasp.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bergsma, J. and Thomasma, D. C.: 1982, Health Care: Its Psychosocial Dimemsions, Duquesne University Press, Pittsburgh.
Bernstein, R. J.: 1980, ‘Philosophy in the conversation of mankind’, Review of Metaphysics 33, 745–75.
Boorse, C.: 1975, ‘On the distinction between disease and illness’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 5, 49–68.
Caplan, A. L.: 1983, ‘Can applied ethics be effective in health care and should it strive to be?’, Ethics 93, 311–19.
Caplan, A. L., Engelhardt, H. T., and McCartney, J. J. (eds.): 1981, Cconcepts of Health and Disease: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
Cassell, E. J.: 1982, ‘The nature of suffering and the goals of medicine’, New England Journal of Medicine 306, 639–45.
Clouser K. D., Culver C. M., and Gert B.: 1981, ‘Malady: A new treatment of disease’, Hastings Center Report 11(3), 29–37.
Engel G. L.: 1977, ‘The need for a new medical model: A challenge for biomedicine’, Science 196, 129–36.
Engelhardt, H. T.: 1975, ‘The concepts of health and disease’, in H. T. Engelhardt and S. F. Spicker (eds.), Evaluation and Explanation in the Biomedical Sciences, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Engelhardt, H. T.: 1984, ‘Clinical problems and the concept of disease’, in L. Nordenfelt and B. I. B. Lindahl (eds.), Health, Disease, and Causal Explanations in Medicine, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 27–41.
Freidson, E.: 1970, Profession of Medicine: A Study of the Sociology of Applied Knowledge, Harper and Row, New York.
Gadow, S.: 1980, ‘Body and self: A dialectic’, Journal of medicine and Philosophy 5, 172–85.
Hawkins, A.: 1984, ‘Two pathographies: A study in illness and literature’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 9, 231–52.
Kleinman, A. F., Eisenberg, L., and Good, B.: 1978. ‘Culture, illness and care: Clinical lessons from anthropologic and cross-cultural research’, Annals of Internal Medicine 88, 251–58.
Levine, S. and Kozloff, M. A.: 1978. ‘The sick role: Assessment and overview’, Annual Review of Sociology 4, 317–43.
MacIntyre, A.: 1981, After Virtue, Notre Dame University Press, South Bend, IN.
Parsons, T.: 1951, The Social System, Free Press, Glencoe, IL.
Pellegrino, E. D.: 1979, ‘Toward a reconstruction of medical morality: The primacy of the act of profession and the fact of illness’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 4, 32–56.
Pellegrino, E. D. and Thomasma, D. C.: 1981, A Philosophical Basis of Medical Practice, Oxford University Press, New York.
Rawls, J.: 1971, A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Rawls, J.: 1980, ‘Kantian constructivism in moral theory’, Journal of Philosophy 77, 515–72.
Rorty R.: 1979, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Rorty R.: 1982, Consequences of Pragmatism, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
Sellars W.: 1963, Science, Perception and Reality, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Toulmin S.: 1981, ‘The tyranny of principles’, Hastings Center Report 11 (6): 31–39.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brody, H. Philosophy of medicine and other humanities: Toward a wholistic view. Theor Med Bioeth 6, 243–255 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00489728
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00489728