Summary
Head and neck surgery may be complicated by penetration of the dura resulting in meningitis, cerebrospinal rhinorrhoea, cerebral abscess or other intracranial complications. The strength of the dura mater both protects the brain and spinal cord and makes dura an ideal material for grafting (when needed). This study examines the thickness and histological composition of dura mater at various sites encountered in head and neck surgery. Dura was removed from eight specified locations in 14 adult cadavers. Microscopically, this dura was found to consist predominantly of collagen fibres, although the thickness of the dura varied between sites. Dura was significantly thinner in relation to the ethmoid sinus (P<0.01), tegmen (P<0.05) and sigmoid sinus (P<0.001), indicating its greater susceptibility to possible injury at these sites during surgery. The variety of its thickness also makes dura a more versatile homograft material than hitherto realised.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Armitage P (1971) Statistical methods in medical research. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 217–223
Last RJ (1978) Anatomy, regional and applied. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh London New York, pp 480–483
Murzin VE, Goryunov VN (1979) Study of the strength of adherence of the dura mater to the bones of the skull. Zh Vopr Neirohir 4:43–47
Nakiri K, Jacobs G, Pennza P, Kiraty R, Nose Y (1975) Dura mater valves for cardiac prostheses. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 21:573–580
Sabatini DD, Bensch K, Barnett RJ (1963) The preservation of cellular ultrastructure and enzymatic activity by aldehyde fixation. J Cell Biol 17:19–58
Zhivoderov NN, Zavalishin NN, Neniukov AK (1983) Mechanical properties of dura mater of the human brain. Sud Med Ekspeirt 26:36–37
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Willatt, D.J., Yung, M.W. & Helliwell, T.R. A correlation of the surgical anatomy of the dura to head and neck surgery. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 243, 403–406 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00464652
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00464652