Conclusions
What then can be said that is known about sex-related differences in mathematics and factors related to such differences? Certainly, when both females and males study the same amount of mathematics, differences in learning mathematics are minimal and perhaps decreasing. Many fewer females elect to study mathematics and therein lies the problem. Variables which appear to contribute to this non-election are females' lesser confidence in their ability to learn mathematics and their belief that mathematics is not useful to them. In addition, differential teacher treatment of males and females is important. All variables appear to be directly related to the stereotyping of mathematics as a male domain.
There is nothing inherent (Sherman [30]) which keeps females from learning mathematics at the same level as do males. Intervention programs can and must be designed and implemented within schools which will increase females' participation in mathematics. Such programs should include male students, female students and their teachers. Only when such intervention programs become effective can true equity in mathematics education be accomplished.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Bibliography
AikenL. R., ‘Intellective Variables and Mathematics Achievement: Directions for Research’, Journal of School Psychology 9 (1971), 201.
BachmanA. M., ‘The Relationship Between a Seventh-grade Pupil's Academic Self-concept and Achievement in Mathematics’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 1 (1970), 173–179.
BobbeC. N., ‘Sex-role Preference and Academic Achievement’, (Doctoral Dissertation, Yeshiva University, 1971), Dissertation Abstracts International, 32B (1971), 1818–1819.
BrookoverW. B. and ThomasS., ‘Self-concept of Ability and School Achievement’, Sociology of Education 37 (3) (1964), 271–279.
BrownowskiJ., ‘mathematics’, In D.Thompson and J.Reeves (eds.), The Quality of Education, Muller, London, 1947.
CallahanL. G. and GlennonV. J., Elementary School Mathematics: A Guide to Current Research, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Washington, D.C., 1975.
CasserlyP. L., An Assessment of Factors Affecting Female Participation in Advanced Placement Programs in Mathematics, Chemistry and Physics (Grant No. GY-11325), National Science Foundation, Washington D.C., 1975.
Conway, J. K., ‘Perspective on the History of Women's Education in the United States’, in Perspectives on Female Education, Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, 1973.
CrandallV. J., KatovskyW. and PrestonA., ‘Motivational and Ability Determinants of Young Children's Intellectual Achievement Behaviors’, Child Development 33 (1962), 643–661.
CrosswhiteF. J., ‘Correlates of Attitudes Toward Mathematics’, NLSMA Report No. 20, Abstracted by L. R. Aiken. Investigations in Mathematics Education 8 (3) (1975), 38–40.
FennemaE., ‘Mathematics Learning and the Sexes: A Review’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 5 (1974), 126.
FennemaE., ‘Spatial Ability, Mathematics and the Sexes’, in E.Fennema (ed.), Mathematics Learning: What Research Says About Sex Differences, ERIC Center for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Education, College of Education, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 1975.
Fennema, E., ‘Influences of Selected Cognitive, Affective and Educational Variables on Sex-related Differences in Mathematics Learning and Studying’, Women and Mathematics: Research Perspectives for Change—NIE Papers in Education and Work, No. 8, 1977.
Fennema, E. and Meyer, R. A., Attitudes Toward Mathematics held by Females Educated in Single Sex or Coed Schools, 1976 (Unpublished).
FennemaE. and ShermanJ. A., ‘Sex-related Differences in Mathematics Achievement, Spatial Visualization and Affective Factors’, American Educational Research Journal 14 (1) (1977), 51–72.
FennemaE. and ShermanJ. A., ‘Sex-Related Differences in Mathematics Achievement and Related Factors: A Further Study’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 9 (1978), 189.
Fennema, E., Wolleat, P., Pedro, J. D., and Becker, A., ‘Increasing Women's Participation in Mathematics: An Intervention Study’, Paper presented at the National Conference of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, April, 1979.
FinkM. B., ‘Self-concept as it Relates to Academic Underachievement’, California Journal of Educational Research 13 (1969), 57–61.
FlanaganJ. C., ‘Changes in School Levels of Achievement: Project TALENT Ten and Fifteen Year Retests’, Educational Researcher 5 (8) (1976), 9.
Fox, L. H., ‘The Effects of Sex Role Socialization on Mathematics Participation and Achievement’, Women and Mathematics: Research Perspectives for Change—NIE Papers in Education and Work, No. 8, p. 1, 1977.
GlennonV. J. and CallahanL. G.: A Guide to Current Research: Elementary School Mathematics, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Washington, D.C. 1968.
GoodT. L., SikesJ. N., and BrophyJ. E., ‘Effects of Teacher Sex and Student Sex on Classroom Interaction’, Journal of Educational Psychology 65 (1973), 74.
HusénT. (ed.), International Study of Achievement in Mathematics: A Comparison of Twelve Countries, John Wiley/Almquist and Wiksell, New York/Stockholm, 2 vols, 1967.
KaganJ., ‘Acquisition and Significance of Sex Typing and Sex Role Identity, in M. L.Hoffman and L.Hoffman (eds), Review of Child Development Research, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, 1964.
Keeves, J. P., ‘Differences Between the Sexes in Mathematics and Science Courses’, International Review of Education 19 (1973), p. 47.
LevitonH., ‘The Implications of the Relationship Between Self-Concept and Academic Achievement’, Child Study Journal 5 (1975), 25–36.
MaccobyE. E. and JacklinC. N., The Psychology of Sex Differences, Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, 1974.
MinuchinP. P., ‘Sex-role Concepts and Sex Typing in Childhood as a function of School and Home Environments’, in G. C.Thompson (ed.), 1971, Social Development and Personality, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1971.
PrimaveraL. H., SimonW. E., and PrimaveraA. M., ‘The Relationship Between Self-esteem and Academic Achievement: An Investigation of Sex Differences’, Psychology in the Schools 11 (1974), 213–216.
Sherman, J. A., ‘Effects of Biological Factors on Sex-related Differences in Mathematics Achievement’, Women and Mathematics: Research Perspectives for Change—NIE Papers in Education and Work, No. 8, p. 137, 1977.
SteinA. H., ‘The Effects of Sex Role Standards for Achievement Motivation’, Development Psychology 4 (1971), 219–231.
SteinA. H. and SmithellsJ., ‘Age and Sex Differences in Children's Sex Role Standards About Achievement’, Development Psychology 1 (1969), 252–259.
Suydam, M. N. and Riedesel, C. A., Interpretive Study of Research and Development in Elementary School Mathematics, Vol. 1, Introduction and Summary: What Research Says, Final report, Project No. 8-0586, Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 1969.
WeaverJ. F., ‘Seductive Shibboleths’, The Arithmetic Teacher 18 (1971), 263.
WilsonJ. W., Patterns of Mathematics Achievement in Grade 11:Z Population, National Longitudinal Study of Mathematical Abilities, No. 17 Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, California, 1972.
Wise, L. L., ‘The Role of Mathematics in Women's Career Development’, Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Canada, 1978.
Wolleat, P. L., Pedro, J. D., Becker, A. D., and Fennema, E., ‘Sex-related Differences in Attribution in Mathematics’, (Manuscript in preparation,). 1979.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fennema, E. Women and girls in mathematics—Equity in mathematics education. Educ Stud Math 10, 389–401 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00417086
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00417086