Abstract
Since specular microscopy of the cornea offers the opportunity to observe and measure cells in vivo without any outside interference this method forms an unrivalled basis for estimation of tissue shrinkage during various preparatory methods. Therefore a study was performed with the purpose of evaluating the degree of artifacts in each preparatory step from the living tissue “in vivo” to the final SEM specimen.
The study was performed on rabbit corneas, the endothelium serving as measuring target. The in vivo state was recorded by specular microscopy. Unfixed corneas were studied by light microscopy unstained and stained by alizarin red S or silver nitrate. Fixation was performed intracamerally with 1.5% glutaraldehyde (Gla) by a pH, osmolarity, viscosity and intraocular pressure identical with the physiological values of rabbit eyes. Fixation was completed by immersion in 2.5% Gla for 1/2 h. Gla-fixed corneas were evaluated as above before osmification.
Dehydration was performed either by graded acetone, by acetone in a gradient-free system, both followed by critical point drying (CPD).
At all steps cells were counted using the same reference frame. The number of cells/mm2 was estimated and statistical analysis showed a shrinkage of 22 per cent (area) in unfixed tissue, 26 per cent (area) in normally dehydrated tissue and 37 per cent (area) in gradient free dehydrated tissue processed for SEM.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Binder PS, Akers P, Zavala EY Endothelial cell density determined by specular microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (in press)
Blackwell WL, Gravenstein N, Kaufman HE (1977) Comparison of central corneal endothelial cell numbers with peripheral areas. Amer J Ophthalmol 84:473–476
Boyde A (1978a) Volumenänderungen biologischer Gewebe bei Entwässerung und Trocknung. Beitr elektronenmikroskop Direktabb Oberfl 11:231–242
Boyde A (1978b) Pros and cons of critical point drying and freeze drying for SEM. SEM II:303–313
Boyde A, Bailey E, Jones SJ, Tamarin A (1977) Dimensional changes during specimen preparation for scanning electron microscopy. SEM I:507–518
Clark JI, Mengel L, Benedek GB (1980) Scanning electron microscopy of opaque and transparent states in reversible calf lens cataracts. Ophthalmic Res 12:16–33
Gusnard D, Kirschner RH (1977) Cell and organelle shrinkage during preparation for SEM. Effects of fixation, dehydration and CPD. J Microscopy 110:51–57
Laing RA, Sandstrom MM, Berrospi AR, Leibowitz HM (1976) Changes in the corneal endothelium as a function of age. Exp Eye Res 22:587–594
Laule A, Cable MK, Hoffman CE, Hanna C (1978) Endothelial cell population changes of human cornea during life. Arch Ophthalmol 96:2031–2035
Lee RMKW, Garfield RE, Forrest JB, Daniel EE (1979) The effects of fixation, dehydration and critical point drying on the size of cultured smooth muscle cells. SEM III:439–448
Madge DS (1974) Scanning electon microscopy of normal and diseased mouse small intestinal mucosa. J Microscopie 20:45–50
Schneider GB, Pockwinse SM, Billings-Gagliardi S (1978) Morphological changes in isolated lymphocytes during preparation for SEM: A comparative TEM/SEM study of freeze drying and critical point drying. SEM II:77–84
Sperling S (1977) Combined staining of corneal endothelium by alizarine red and trypane blue. Acta ophthal 55:573–580
Sperling S (1978) Indirect evaluation of corneal endothelial cell density. Acta ophthal 56:445–454
Sperling S, Gundersen HJG (1978) The precision of unbiased estimates of numerical density of endothelial cells in donor corneas. Acta ophthal 56:793–802
Sturrock GD, Sherrard ES, Rice NSC (1978) Specular microscopy of the corneal endothelium. Brit J Ophthal 62:809–814
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jensen, O.A., Prause, J.U. & Laursen, H. Shrinkage in preparatory steps for SEM. Albrecht von Graefes Arch Klin Ophthalmol 215, 233–242 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00407662
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00407662