Summary
Sound and ultrasound emitted by industrial ultrasonic (Uls) devices exceed the known proposed hygienic limits, especially for frequencies 10–20 kHz. The consequence of this may be a negative influence of this energy on the auditory function in the high-frequency hearing range. To determine the hearing risk to Uls operators, an adequate method for testing the hearing threshold from 10-20 kHz has been developed. In order to get reference values, 189 non-exposed persons were tested. On this basis, the hearing thresholds of 55 operators for frequencies 500–20,000 Hz were evaluated. In addition to threshold elevations in the range 10–20 kHz, a decreasing number of subjects responding to stimuli at the highest audible frequencies was observed. The threshold shift at 10–20 kHz of subjects exposed to sound and ultrasound emitted by Uls-devices depends upon the physical parameters of the sound spectrum, time on the job and daily exposure time. No abnormalities were found in the hearing range 500–8000 Hz.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Acton WI (1968) A criterion for the prediction of auditory and subjective effects due to air-borne noise from ultrasonic sources. Ann Occup Hyg 11:227–234
Acton WI (1976) Exposure criteria for industrial ultrasound. Ultrasonics 14:42
Dieroff HG (1976) Erfahrungen mit der Hochfrequenzaudiometrie und ihre Einsatzmöglichkeit. Laryng Rhinol 55:739–743
Erickson DA, Fausti SA, Frey RH, Rappaport BZ (1980) Effects of steady-state noise upon human hearing sensitivity from 8,000–20,000 Hz. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 41:427–432
Fausti SA, Frey RH, Erickson DA, Rappaport BZ, Cleary EJ (1979) A system for evaluation auditory function from 8,000–20,000 Hz. J Acoust Soc Am 66:1713–1718
Fletcher JL (1973) High-frequency hearing and noise exposure. Proc. Intern. Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem. Dubrovnik, Yugoslavia, May 13–18, 1973. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC 20460, pp 271–280
GOST 12.1.001-75 Ultrazvuk Obszczije triebovanija biezopasnosti
Grzesik J, Pluta E (1980) Noise and airborne ultrasound exposure in the industrial environment. Proc Third Intern. Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem. Freyburg, West Germany, September 25–29, 1978, ASHA Reports 10. The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Rockville, Maryland, April 1980, pp 657–661
Harris JD, Meyers CK (1971) Tentative audiometric threshold-level standards from 8 through 18 kHz. J Accoust Soc Am 49:600–601
Nothern JL, Downs MP, Rudmose W, Glorig A, Fletcher JL (1972) Recommended high frequency audiometric threshold levels (8,000–18,000Hz). J Acoust Soc Am 52:585–595
Parrack HO (1972) Occupational exposure to noise. US Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Health Services and Mental Health Administration NIOSH
Rosen S, Plaster D, El-Mofty A, Rosen H (1964) High frequency audiometry in presbycusis. Otolaryngol 79:18–32
Sagalovich BN, Simbirceva OI (1971) Audiometrija v razsziriennom diapazonie czastot. Viestnik Otorinolaryngol 5:25–30
Brüel and Kjaer (1977) Microphones used as sound sources. Technical Review No 3
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grzesik, J., Pluta, E. High-frequency hearing risk of operators of industrial ultrasonic devices. Int. Arch Occup Environ Heath 53, 77–88 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00406179
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00406179