Summary
The paper reports the results of a 2-year study of pairing success of male pied flycatchers in a homogeneous habitat. A handicapping experiment was carried out in which certain wing and tail feathers were removed from randomly selected males. Handicapped males had reduced pairing success, they lost weight, and they sang less frequently than control males. Male pairing success was positively correlated with the darkness of the plumage, body-size, and previous breeding experience. Earlier studies on the same species have failed to detect any relationships between pairing success and male characteristics, possibly because of habitat heterogeneity and variation in nest site quality. The evolutionary basis for female choice of male characteristics is discussed. There are reports that males with attractive traits (e.g. black plumage) provide a high quality of parental care. However, the fact that male pairing success was related to male conspicuousness makes it difficult to discriminate between active and passive female choice.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Alatalo RV, Lundberg A, Ståhlbrandt K (1982) Why do pied flycatcher females mate with already-mated males? Anim Behav 30:585–593
Alatalo RV, Lundberg A, Ståhlbrandt K (1984) Female mate choice in the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Behav Ecol Sociobicol 14:253–261
Alatalo RV, Lundberg A, Glynn C (1986a) Female pied flycatchers choose territory quality and not male characteristics. Nature 323:152–153
Alatalo RV, Gustafsson L, Lundberg A (1986b) Do females prefer older males in polygynous bird species? Am Nat 127:241–245
Andersson M (1982) Female choice selects for extreme tail length in a widowbird. Nature 299:818–820
Askenmo CEH (1984) Polygyny and nest site selection in the pied flycatcher. Anim Behav 32:972–980
Bischoff RJ, Gould JL, Rubenstein DI (1985) Tail size and female choice in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 17:253–255
Burley N (1981) Mate choice by multiple criteria in a monogamous species. Am Nat 117:515–528
Davies NB (1978) Ecological questions about territorial behaviour. In: Krebs JR and Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology. An evolutionary approach. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 317–350
Drost R (1936) Über das Brutkleid männlicher Trauerfliegenfänger, Muscicapa hypoleuca. Vogelzug 6:179–186
Eriksson D, Wallin L (1986) Male bird song attracts females — a field experiment. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19:297–299
Falconer DS (1981) Introduction to quantitative genetics. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh
Gibson RM, Bradbury JW (1985) Sexual selection in lekking sage grouse: phenotypic correlates of male mating success. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:117–123
Gustafsson L (1986) Lifetime reproductive success and heritability: empirical support of Fisher's fundamental theorem. Am Nat 128:761–764
Haartman L von (1954) Der Trauerfliegenschnäpper. III. Die Nahrungsbiologie. Acta Zool Fenn 83:1–96
Halliday TR (1978) Sexual selection and mate choice. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology. An evolutionary approach. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 180–213
Halliday TR (1983) The study of mate choice. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 3–32
Harvey PH, Greenwood PJ, Perrins CM, Martin AR (1979) Breeding success of great tits Parus major in relation to age of male and female parent. Acta Zool Fenn 121:216–219
Järvi T, Røskaft E, Slagsvold T (1982) The conflict between male polygamy and female monogamy: some comments on the ‘cheating hypothesis’. Am Nat 120:689–691
Järvi T, Røskaft E, Bakken M, Zumsteg B (1987) Evolution of variation in male secondary sexual characteristics; a test of eight hypotheses applied on pied flycatchers. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20:161–169
Kirkpatrick M (1985) Evolution of female choice and male parental investment in polygynous species: the demise of the ‘sexy son’. Am Nat 125:788–810
Kodric-Brown A (1985) Female preference and sexual selection for male coloration in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 17:199–205
Lifjeld JT, Slagsvold T (1986) The function of courtship feeding during incubation in the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Anim Behav 34:1441–1453
Lifjeld JT, Slagsvold T (1988) Mate fidelity of renesting pied flycatchers in relation to characteristics of the pair mates. Behav Ecol Sociobiol (in press)
Lifjeld JT, Slagsvold T, Stenmark G (1987) Allocation of incubation feeding in a polygynous mating system: a study on pied flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca. Anim Behav 35:1663–1669
Nilsson SG (1984) The evolution of nest-site selection among hole-nesting birds: the importance of nest predation and competition. Ornis Scand 15:167–175
O'Donald P (1980) Genetic models of sexual selection. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Parker GA (1983) Mate quality and mating decisions. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 141–166
Partridge L, Halliday TR (1984) Mating patterns and mate choice. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology. An evolutionary approach. Second edition. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 222–250
Payne RB (1982) Ecological consequences of song matching: breeding success and intraspecific song mimicry in indigo buntings. Ecology 63:401–411
Perrins CM, McCleery RH (1985) The effect of age and pair bond on the breeding success of great tits Parus major. Ecology 127:306–315
Price TD (1984) Sexual selection on body size, territory and plumage variables in a population of Darwin's finches. Evolution 38:327–341
Searcy WA (1982) The evolutionary effects of mate selection. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 13:57–85
Slagsvold T (1986) Nest site settlement by the pied flycatcher: does the female choose her mate for the quality of his house or himself? Ornis Scand 17:210–220
Slagsvold T (1987) Nest site preference and clutch size in the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Ornis Scand 18:189–197
Slagsvold T, Lifjeld JT (1986) Mate retention and male polyter-ritoriality in the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19:25–30
Slagsvold T, Lifjeld JT (1988) Plumage colour and sexual selection in the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Anim Behav (in press)
Slagsvold T, Lifjeld JT, Stenmark G, Breiehagen T (1988) On the cost of searching for a mate in female pied flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca. Anim Behav (in press)
Stresemann E, Stresemann V (1966) Die Mauser der Vögel. J Orn 107: Sonderheft
Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871–1971. Aldine, Chicago, pp 136–179
Weatherhead PJ (1984) Mate choice in avian polygyny: Why do females prefer older males? Am Nat 123:873–875
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lifjeld, J.T., Slagsvold, T. Female pied flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca choose male characteristics in homogeneous habitats. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22, 27–36 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00395695
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00395695