Abstract
This study was carried out to develop improved methods for measuring in-vivo stress relaxation of growing tissues and to compare relaxation in the stems of four different species. When water uptake by growing tissue is prevented, in-vivo stress relaxation occurs because continued wall loosening reduces wall stress and cell turgor pressure. With this procedure one may measure the yield threshold for growth (Y), the turgor pressure in excess of the yield threshold (P-Y), and the physiological wall extensibility (ϕ). Three relaxation techniques proved useful: “turgor-relaxation”, “balance-pressure” and “pressure-block”. In the turgor-relaxation method, water is withheld from growing tissue and the reduction in turgor is measured directly with the pressure probe. This technique give absolute values for P and Y, but requires tissue excision. In the balance-pressure technique, the excised growing region is sealed in a pressure chamber, and the subsequent reduction in water potential is measured as the applied pressure needed to return xylem sap to the cut surface. This method is simple, but only measures (P-Y) not the individual values of P and Y. In the pressure-block technique, the growing tissue is sealed into a pressure chamber, growth is monitored continuously, and just sufficient pressure is applied to the chamber to block growth. The method gives high-resolution kinetics of relaxation and does not require tissue excision, but only measures (P-Y).
The three methods gave similar results when applied to the growing stems of pea (Pisum sativum L.), cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.), soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) and zucchini (Curcubita pepo L.) seedlings. Values for (P-Y) averaged between 1.4 and 2.7 bar, depending on species. Yield thresholds averaged between 1.3 and 3.0 bar. Compared with the other methods, relaxation by pressure-block was faster and exhibited dynamic changes in wall-yielding properties. The two pressure-chamber methods were also used to measure the internal water-potential gradient (between the xylem and the epidermis) which drives water uptake for growth. For the four species it was small, between 0.3 and 0.6 bar, and so did not limit growth substantially.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Abbreviations
- L:
-
tissue hydraulic conductance
- P:
-
cell turgor pressure
- Y:
-
wall yield threshold
- ε:
-
volumetric elastic modulus
- ϕ:
-
physiological wall extensibility
References
Boyer, J.S., Cavalieri, A.J., Schulze, E. (1985) Control of the rate of cell enlargement: Excision, wall relaxation and growth-induced water potentials. Planta 164, 527–543
Cosgrove, D. (1982) Rapid inhibition of hypocotyl growth by blue light in Sinapis alba L. Plant Sci. Lett. 25, 305–312
Cosgrove, D.J. (1985) Cell wall yield properties of growing tissues. Evaluation by in-vivo stress relaxation. Plant Physiol. 78, 347–356
Cosgrove, D.J. (1986) Biophysical control of plant cell growth. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 37, 377–405
Cosgrove, D.J., Cleland, R.E. (1983) Solutes in the free space of growing stem tissues. Plant Physiol. 72, 326–331
Cosgrove, D.J., Durachko, D.M. (1986) Automated pressure probe for measurement of water transport properties of higher plant cells. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 57, 2614–2619
Cosgrove, D.J., Van Volkenburgh, E., Cleland, R.E. (1984) Stress relaxation of cell walls and the yield threshold for growth: Demonstration and measurement by micro-pressure probe and psychrometer techniques. Planta 162, 46–52
Green, P.B., Bauer, K., Cummins, W.R. (1977) Biophysical model for plant cell growth: auxin effects. In: Water relations in membrane transport in plants, pp 30–45, Jungreis, A.M., Hodges, T.K., Kleinzeller, A., Schultz, S.G., eds. Academic Press, New York
Green, P.B., Erickson, R.O., Buggy, J. (1971) Metabolic and physical control of cell elongation rate. In-vivo studies in Nitella. Plant Physiol. 47, 423–430
Hsiao, T.C., Silk, W.K., Jing, J. (1985) Leaf growth and water deficits: biophysical effects. Control of Leaf Growth (Soc. Exp. Biol. Seminar Ser. 27), pp. 239–266, Baker, N.R., Davis, W.D., Ong, C., eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Milburn, J.A. (1979) Water flow in plants. Longman, London, New York
Molz, F.M., Boyer, J.S. (1978) Growth-induced water potentials in plant cells and tissues. Plant Physiol. 62, 423–429
Ortega, J.K.E. (1985) Augmented growth equation for cell wall expansion. Plant Physiol. 78, 318–320
Silk, W.K. (1984) Quantitative descriptions of development. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 35, 479–518
Steudle, E., Boyer, J.S. (1985) Hydraulic resistance to radial water flow in growing hypocotyl of soybean measured by a new pressure-perfusion technique. Planta 164, 189–200
Steudle, E., Boyer, J.S. (1985) Hydraulic resistance to radial water flow in growing hypocotyl of soybean measured by a new pressure-perfusion technique. Planta 164, 189–200
Van Volkenburgh, E., Cleland, R.E. (1986) Wall yield threshold and effective turgor in growing bean leaves. Planta 167, 37–43
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cosgrove, D.J. Wall relaxation in growing stems: comparison of four species and assessment of measurement techniques. Planta 171, 266–278 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00391104
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00391104