Abstract
The paper introduces the concept of information cost and explains its relevance to the organisation of the firm. A distinction is drawn between autocratic and consultative management styles, and the economic logic of each style is explained in terms of information costs. It is argued that autocratic management is a rational organisational response to a business environment that contains a single dominant source of volatility, while consultative management is a rational response to multiple sources of volatility. It is argued that small firms exploit the advantages of the autocratic style. Small firms are therefore to be found predominantly in industries dominated by a single source of volatility.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
CassonMark C., 1991, Economics of Business Culture, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Casson, Mark C., 1994a, ‘Information Costs and the Organisational Structure of the Multinational Enterprise’, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of International Business, Boston, November 1994.
CassonMark C., 1994b, ‘Why are Firms Hierarchical?’ Journal of the Economics of Business 1, 47–76.
Coase, Ronald H., 1937, ‘The Nature of the Firm’, Economica (New Series), 386–405.
MilgromPaul R. and JohnRoberts, 1992, Economics of Organisation and Management, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
RadnerRoy, 1992, ‘Hierarchy: The Economics of Managing’, Journal of Economic Literature 30, 1382–1415.
WilliamsonOliver E., 1985, Economic Institutions of Capitalism, New York: Free Press.
WuH., 1988, Production, Entrepreneurship and Profits, Oxford: Blackwell.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Casson, M. The comparative organisation of large and small firms: An information cost approach. Small Bus Econ 8, 329–345 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00389552
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00389552