Summary
It is a common misconception that correlations between variables that share a common term are statistically invalid. Although the idea that such relationships are wholly or partially spurious was rejected decades ago by statisticians, ecologists continue mistakenly to exclude legitimate hypotheses on this basis. Besides directing attention to the statistical literature on the subject, we briefly reconsider the problem from 3 viewpoints: first, the confusion between spurious correlation and spurious inference, second, the problem of concept familiarity and definition, with particular reference to the self-thinning rule for plants, and third, a legitimate concern with measurement error of shared variable components.
Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Atchley WR, Gaskins CT, Anderson D (1976) Statistical properties of ratios. I. Empiricalresults. Syst Zool 25:137–148
Bhattacharyya GK, Johnson RA (1977) Statistical concepts and methods. John Wiley and Sons, New York
Garsd A (1984) Spurious correlation in ecological modelling. Ecol Model 23:191–201
Gorham E (1979) Shoot height, weight, and standing crop in relation to density in monospecific plant stands. Nature (London) 279:148–150
Kendall MG, Stuart A (1973) The advanced theory of statistics. Vol. 2: Inference and relationships. 3rd edition. Charles Griffin and Co., New York
Kenney BC (1982) Beware of spurious self-correlations. Water Res Res 18:1041–1048
Kuh E, Meyer JR (1955) Correlation and regression estimates when the data are ratios. Econometrica 23:400–416
Lapin LL (1980) Statistics: meaning and method. 2nd edition. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York
Long SB (1980) The continning debate over the use of ratio variables: facts and fiction. In: Schuessler KF (ed) Sociological Methodology. Jossey-Bass Publ
Pearson K (1897) Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. —On a form of spurious correlation which may arise when indices are used in the measurement of organs. Proc Roy Soc (London) 60:489–498
Peters RH (1983) The ecological implications of body size. Cambridge University Press, London
Rublee PA (1982) Bacterial and microbial distribution in estuarine sediments. In: Kennedy V (ed) Estuarine comparisons. Academic Press, New York, pp 159–182
Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry. 2nd edition. Freeman and Co. San Francisco
Weller DE (1987) A reevaluation of the-3/2 power rule of plant selfthinning. Ecol Monogr 578:23–42
Yalin MS, Kamphuis JW (1971) Theory of dimensions and spurious correlation. J Hyd 9:249–265
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
A contribution to the Limnology Research Centre of McGill University
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Prairie, Y.T., Bird, D.F. Some misconceptions about the spurious correlation problem in the ecological literature. Oecologia 81, 285–288 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379817
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379817