Summary
The flowers of the annual herb Impatiens capensis have distinct male and female phases. The male phase lasts four times as long as the female phase, and male flowers contain about 50% more nectar than female flowers. This suggests that the bulk of allocation to the flower is designed to ensure the dispersal of pollen rather than the fertilization of ovules. Honeybees, wasps and bumble bees all land on male flowers more often than would be expected by chance, and, having landed, wasps and bumble bees are more likely to enter a male flower than a female flower. The frequency of male flowers in the diet therefore exceeds their frequency in the population. This preference, although strong and consistent, is only partial, since some female flowers are included in the diet. We propose two hypotheses to account for the observed partial preference, the first based on competition between bees for flowers, and the second asserting that the bees detect nectar levels directly without using floral gender as a cue. The results of an experiment in which the most obvious gender cue, the androecium, was removed are consistent with the second hypothesis.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Charnov EL (1973) Optimal foraging: some theoretical explorations. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Washington, Seattle
Charnov EL (1976) Optimal foraging: the marginal value theorem. Theoret Pop Biol 9:129–136
Cruden RW, Hermann MH, Peterson S (1983) Patterns of nectar production and plant-pollinator coevolution. In: Bentley B, Elias T (eds), The Biology of Nectaries. Columbia Univ Press, NY, pp 80–125
Fretwell SD (1972) Populations in a Seasonal Environment. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey
Heinrich B (1972) Energetics of temperature regulation and foraging in a bumblebee, Bombus terricola Kirby. J Comp Physiol 77:49–64
Heinrich B (1976) Resource partitioning among some eusocial insects: bumblebees. Ecology 57:874–889
Heinrich B (1978) Bumble Bee Economics. Harvard University Press. Cambridge, Massachusetts
Josselyn J (1972) New-Englands Rarities Discovered. G. Widdowes, London
Krebs JR, Stephens DW, Sutherland WJ (1983) Perspectives in optimal foraging. In: Brush AJ, Clark GA (eds) Perspectives in Ornithology. Cambridge University Press, pp 165–221
Martin AC, Zim HS, Nelson AL (1951) American Wildlife and Plants. Dover Publications, New York
Maycock PF (1961) Botanical studies on Mont St. Hilaire, Rouville County, Quebec. General description of the area and floristic survey. Can J Bot 39:1293–1325
Pyke GH, Pulliam HR, Charnov EL (1977) Optimal foraging: a selective review of theory and tests. Quart Rev Biol 52:137–154
Pleasants JM (1981) Bumblebee response to variation in nectar availability. Ecology 62:1648–1661
Robertson C (1928) Flowers and Insects. Science Press Printing Co., Lancaster, Pennsylvania
Rust RW (1977) Pollination in Impatiens capensis and Impatiens pallida (Balsaminaceae). Bull Torrey Bot Club 104:361–367
Waser NM, Price MV (1983) Pollinator behaviour and natural selection for flower colour in Delphinium nelsonii. Nature 302:422–424
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bell, G., Lefebvre, L., Giraldeau, L.A. et al. Partial preference of insects for the male flowers of an annual herb. Oecologia 64, 287–294 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379123
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379123