Summary
The mechanical impedance of the hand and arm was studied on ten healthy subjects during exposure to sinusoidal vibration within the frequency range of 2 to 1000 Hz. A special handle for the measurements was constructed. The influence of vibration direction, handle grip, grip force, vibration level, hand-arm posture and sex as well as anthropometric data were studied. The results show that the impedance of the hand-arm mainly depends on the frequency and direction of the vibration stimuli. Higher vibration levels, as well as more firm hand-grips, resulted in higher impedance. Furthermore, the outcome shows that experiments conducted with different hand-arm postures had an active influence on the mechanical impedance. Moreover, the subjects' sex and constitution of the hand and arm affected the impedance to a large extent.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abrams CF, Suggs CW (1977) Development of a simulator for use in the measurement of chain saw vibration. App Erg 8:130–134
Box GEP, Hunter WG, Hunter JS (1978) Statistics for experimenters. An introduction to design, data analysis and model building. John Wiley and Sons, New York
Brammer AJ, Taylor W (eds) (1982) Vibrations effects of the hand and arm in industry. John Wiley and Sons, New York
Coermann R (1962) The mechanical impedance of the human body in sitting and standing position at low frequencies. Human Factors 4:277–253
Cundiff JS (1976) Energy dissipation in human hand-arm exposed to random vibration. J Acous Soc Am 1:212–214
Hempstock TI, O'Connor DE (1986) Accuracy of measuring impedance in the hand-arm system. Scand J Work Environ Health 12:355–358
Hixon EL (1976) Mechanical impedance. In: Harris CM, Crede CE (eds) Shock and vibration handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 10.1–10.46
International Organization for Standardization, ISO 5349 (1986) Guidelines for the measurements and the assessment of the human exposure to hand-transmitted vibrations. ISO, Geneva
Lidström I-M (1977) Vibration injury in rock drillers, chiselers, and grinders: some views on the relationship between the quantity of energy absorbed and the risk of occurrence of vibration injury. In: Wasserman DE, Taylor W, Curry MG (eds) Proc Int Occup Hand-Arm Vib Conf. NIOSH-publication No. 77–170, Cincinnati, pp 77–83
Lundström R (1984) Local vibrations— mechanical impedance of the human hand's glabrous skin. J Biomech 17:137–144
Lundström R, Burström L (1989) Mechanical impedance of the human hand-arm system. Int J Ind Erg 3:235–242
Mishoe JW, Suggs CW (1977) Hand-arm vibration, Part II. Vibrational responses of the human hand. J Sound Vib 53:545–558
Olesen HP, Randall RB (1979) A guide to mechanical impedance and structural response techniques. Brüel & Kjaer Application Note 17–179, Copenhagen
Panzke KJ, Balasus W (1985) Time dependence and non-linearity of the impedance of the human hand-arm system while exposed to intense vibration. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 57:35–45
Reynolds DD (I977) Hand-arm vibration: a review of 3 years' research. In: Wasserman DE, Taylor W, Curry MG (eds) Proc Int Occup Hand-Arm Vib Conf. NIOSH-publication No. 77–170, Cincinnati, pp 99–128
Reynolds DD, Keith RH (1977) Hand-arm vibration, part I: Analytic model of the vibration response characteristics of the hand. J Sound Vib 51:237–253
Reynolds DD, Soedel W (1972) Dynamic response of the handarm system to a sinusoidal input. J Sound Vib 21:339–353
Reynolds DD, Wasserman DE, Basel R, Taylor W (1982) Energy entering the hands of operators of pneumatic tools used in chipping and grinding operations. In: Brammer AJ, Taylor W (eds) Vibration effects on the hand and arm in industry. John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp 133–146
Van Cott HP, Kinkade RG (eds) (1972) Human engineering guide to equipment design. McGraw-Hill Company, Washington
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Burström, L. Measurements of the impedance of the hand and arm. Int. Arch Occup Environ Heath 62, 431–439 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379059
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379059