Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Bibliography
Adams, R.: 1978, ‘Primitive thisness and primitive identity’, The Journal of Philosophy 76, pp. 5–26.
Chandler, H.: 1976, ‘Plantinga and the contingently possible’, Analysis 35, pp. 106–9.
Chisholm, R.: 1968, ‘Identity through possible worlds: some questions’, Noûs 1, pp. 1–8.
Chisholm, R.: 1970, ‘Reply to Strawson's comments’, in Kiefer, H. E. and Munitz, M. K., Language, Belief and Metaphysics (SUNY Press).
Chisholm, R.: 1976, Person and Object (Open Court).
Forbes, G.: 1980, ‘Origin and identity’, Philosophical Studies 37, pp. 353–262.
Forbes, G.: 1982, ‘Canonical counterpart theory’, Analysis 42, pp. 33–37.
Forbes, G.: 1983, ‘Thisness and vagueness’, Synthese 54, pp. 235–259.
Forbes, G.: 1983, ‘Physicalism, instrumentalism and the semantics of modal logic’, The Journal of Philosophical Logic 12, pp. 271–298.
Goguen, J.: 1969, ‘The logic of inexact concepts’, Synthese 19, pp. 325–73.
Hazen, A.: 1979, ‘Counterpart-theoretic semantics for modal logic’, The Journal of Philosophy 76, pp. 318–38.
Kaplan, D.: 1975, ‘How to Russell a Frege-Church’, The Journal of Philosophy 72, pp. 716–29.
Kripke, S.: 1972, ‘Naming and necessity’, in Davidson, D. and Harman, G. (eds.): Semantics of Natural Language (Reidel), pp. 253–355.
Kripke, S.: 1980, Naming and Necessity (Harvard).
Lewis, D.: 1968, ‘Counterpart theory and quantified modal logic’, The Journal of Philosophy 65, pp. 113–126.
McGinn, C: 1981, ‘Modal reality’, in Healey, R. (ed.): Reduction, Time and Metaphysics (Cambridge University Press), pp. 143–87.
McMichael, A.: 1983, ‘A problem for actualism about possible worlds’, The Philosophical Review 92, pp. 49–66.
Quine, W. V. O.: 1976, ‘Worlds away’, The Journal of Philosophy 73, pp. 859–63.
Salmon, N.: 1981, Reference and Essence (Princeton University Press).
Wright, C.: 1975, ‘On the coherence of vague predicates’, Synthese 30, pp. 325–65.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Forbes, G. Two solutions to Chisholm's paradox. Philos Stud 46, 171–187 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00373102
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00373102