Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Bibliography
Blue, N. A.: 1981, ‘A metalinguistic interpretation of counterfactual conditionals’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, pp. 179–200.
Chisholm, Roderick M.: 1955, ‘Law statements and counterfactual inference’, Analysis 15, pp. 97–105.
Fine, Kit: 1975, Critical notice of Lewis (1973), Mind 84, pp. 451–458.
Goodman, Nelson: 1947, ‘The problem of counterfactual conditionals’, Journal of Philosophy 44, pp. 113–128.
Jackson, Frank: 1977, ‘A causal theory of counterfactuals’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 55, pp. 3–21.
Howson, Colin and Oddie, Graham: 1979, ‘Miller's so-called paradox of information’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30, pp. 253–278.
Kratzer, Angelika: 1981, ‘Partition and revision: the semantics of counterfactuals’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, pp. 201–216.
Lewis, David: 1973, Counterfactuals (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts).
Lewis, David: 1979, ‘Counterfactual dependence and time's arrow’, Noûs 13, pp. 455–475.
Mill, John Stuart: 1868, System of Logic (Longmans, London).
Pollock, John L.: 1976, Subjunctive Reasoning (D. Reidel, Dordrecht).
Pollock, John L.: 1981, ‘A refined theory of counterfactuals’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, pp. 239–266.
Ramsey, F. P.: 1931, ‘General propositions and causality’, in The Foundations of Mathematics (Humanities, New York).
Tichý, Pavel: 1976, ‘A counterexample to the Stalnaker-Lewis analysis of counterfactuals’, Philosophical Studies 29, pp. 271 -273.
Tichý, Pavel: 1978, ‘A new theory of subjunctive conditionals’, Synthese 37, pp. 433–457.
Tichý, Pavel: 1980a, ‘The logic of temporal discourse’, Linguistics and Philosophy 3, pp. 343–369.
Tichý, Pavel: 1980b, ‘The semantics of episodic verbs’, Theoretical Linguistics 7, pp. 263–296.
Walters, R. S.: 1961, ‘The problem of counterfactuals’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 39, pp. 30–46.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tichý, P. Subjunctive conditionals: Two parameters vs. three. Philos Stud 45, 147–179 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00372476
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00372476