Abstract
The chromatin conformation of somatic and meiotic chromosomes is, at least in part, a function of electrostatic nucleosome interactions that are mediated by transient acetylation of the histone H4 N-terminal domain and phosphorylation of histone H1. The distribution of those histones in the chromatin of meiotic chromosomes is reported here. Antibodies to testis-specific histone 1, H1t, detect H1t in the chromatin of mouse meiotic prophase chromosomes only after synapsis and synaptonemal complex (SC) assembly is completed and before core separation is initiated. The H1t protein is evenly distributed over euchromatin, heterochromatin and the SC. Antibodies to acetylated lysine residues 5, 12 or 16 of histone H4, indicate that the euchromatin is more acetylated than the centromeric heterochromatin. The pattern is most pronounced for acetylated residue 5 and least for 16. Antibodies to phosphorylated H1 epitopes do not react with chromatin but, instead, recognize the chromosome cores and SCs. Possibly these are not phosphorylated histone H1 epitopes, but SC proteins with similar potentially phosphorylatable sequences such as KTPTK of the synaptic protein Syn1.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
CounceSJ, MeyerGF (1973) Differentiation of the synaptonemal complex and the kinetochore in Locusta spermatocytes studied by whole mount electron microscopy. Chromosoma 44:231–253
DresserME, MosesMJ (1979) Silver staining of synaptonemal complexes in surface spreads for light and electron microscopy. Exp Cell Res 121:416–419
DobsonMJ, PearlmanRE, KaraiskakisA, SpyropoulosB, MoensPB (1994) Synaptonemal complex proteins: occurrence, epitope mapping and chromosome disjunction. J Cell Sci 107:2749–2760
GrimesSR, WolfeSA, KoppelDA (1992) Temporal correlation between the appearance of testis-specific DNA-binding proteins and the onset of transcription of the testis-specific histone H1t gene. Exp Cell Res 201:216–224
HengHHQ, TsuiLC, MoensPB (1994) Organization of heterologous DNA inserts on the mouse meiotic chromosome core. chromosoma 103:401–407
JeppesenP, TurnerBM (1993) The inactive X chromosome in female mammals is distinguished by a lack of H4 acetylation, a cytological marker for gene expression. Cell 74:281–289
KremerEJ, KistlerWS (1991) Localization of mRNA for testisspecific histone H1t by in situ hybridization. Exp Cell Res 197:330–332
LoidlP (1994) Histone acetylation: facts and questions. Chromosoma 103:441–449
LuMJ, DaddCA, MizzenCA, PerryCA, McLachlanDR, AnnunziatoAT (1994) Generation and characterization of novel antibodies highly selective for phosphorylated linker histone in Tetrahymena and HeLa cells. Chromosoma 103:111–121
MeistrichML, BrockWA (1987) Proteins of the meiotic cell nucleus. In: MoensPB (ed) Meiosis. Academic Press, New York, pp 333–353
MeistrichML, BucciLR, Trostle-WeigePK, BrockWA (1985) Histone variants in rat spermatogonia and primary spermatocytes. Dev Biol 112:230–240
MeuwissenRLJ, OffenbergHH, DietrichAJJ, RiesewijkA, vanIerselM, HeytingC (1992) A coiled coil-related protein specific for synapsed regions of meiotic prophase chromosomes. EMBO J 11:5091–5100
MoensPB, SpyropoulosB, DobsonM, KaraiskakisA, PearlmanRE (1992) Searching for synaptonemal complex proteins and their genes. Dev Genet 13:435–439
RothSY, AllisCD (1992) Chromatin condensation: does histone H1 dephosphorylation play a role? TIBS 17:93–98
SeyedinSM, KistlerWS (1980) Isolation and characterization of rat testis H1t: an H1 variant associated with spermatogenesis. J Biol Chem 255:5949–5954
TurnerBM, O'NeillLP, AllanIM (1989) Histone H4 acetylation in human cells. Frequency of acetylation at different sites defined by immuno-labelling with site-specific antibodies. FEBS Lett 253:141–145
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moens, P.B. Histones H1 and H4 of surface-spread meiotic chromosomes. Chromosoma 104, 169–174 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00352181
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00352181