Summary
A model for calculating the energy cost of burrowing by fossorial rodents is presented and used to examine the energetics of foraging by burrowing. The pocket gopher Thomomys bottae (Rodentia: Geomyidae) digs burrows for access to food. Feeding tunnels of Thomomys are broken into segments by laterals to the surface that are used to dispose of excavated soil. Energy cost of burrowing depends on both soil type and on burrow structure, defined by the length of burrow segments, angle of ascent of laterals, depth of feeding tunnels, and burrow diameter. In a desert scrub habitat, Thomomys adjust burrow segment length to minimize cost of burrowing. Observed segment lengths (mean=1.33 m) closely approximate the minimum-cost segment length of 1.22 m. Minimizing energy expended per meter of tunnel constructed maximizes efficiency of foraging by burrowing in the desert scrub. Burrow diameter and cost of burrowing increase with body size, while benefits do not, so foraging by burrowing becomes less enconomical as body size increases. Maximum possible body size of fossorial mammals depends on habitat productivity and energy cost of burrowing in local soils.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Aldous CM (1951) The feeding habits of pocket gophers (Thomomys talpoides) in the high mountain ranges of central Utah. J Mammal 32:84–87
Burt WJ, Grossenheider RP (1976) A field guide to the mammals. Houghton Mifflin Co. Boston
Carpenter FL, MacMillen RE (1976) Threshold model of feeding territoriality and test with a Hawaiian honeycreeper. Science 194:639–642
Cavagna GA, Saibene FP Margaria R (1963) Mechanical work in running. J Appl Physiol 18:249–256
Davis WB (1938) Relation of size of pocket gophers to soil and altitude. J Mammal 19:338–342 (1938)
Ellerman JR (1956) The subterranean mammals of the world. Trans Roy Soc S Afr 35:11–20 (1956)
Eloff G (1951) Adaptation in rodent moles and insectivorous moles, and the theory of convergence. Nature (London) 168:1001–1002
Emlen JM (1966) The role of time and energy in food preference. Am Nat 100:611–617 (1966)
Gill FB, Wolf LL (1975a) Foraging strategies of East African sunbirds at mistletoe flowers. Am. Nat. 109:491–510 (1975a)
Gill FB, Wolf LL (1975b) Economics of feeding territoriality in the golden-winged sunbird. Ecology 56:333–345
Grinnell J (1923) The burrowing rodents of California as agents in soil formation. J Mammal. 4:137–149
Hainsworth FR, Wolf LL (1972) Energetics of nectar extraction in a small, high altitude, tropical hummingbird, Selasphorus flammula. J Comp Physiol 80:377–387
Heinrich B (1979) Bumble-bee Economics. Harvard University Press
Halvorsen WL, Patten DT (1975) Productivity and flowering of winter ephemerals in relation to Sonoran Desert shrubs. Am Midl Nat 93:311–319 (1975)
Hansen RM, Miller RS (1959) Observations on plural occupancy of pocket gophers' burrowing systems. J Mammal 40:577–584
Hill JE (1937) Morphology of the pocket gopher genus Thomomys. Univ Calif Berkeley Publ Zool 42:81–172
Hollinger CD (1916) Anatomical adaptations in the thoracic limb of the California pocket gopher and other rodents. Univ Calif Berkeley Publ Zool 13:447–495
Howard WE, Childs HE (1959) Ecology of pocket gophers with emphasis on Thomomys bottae mewa. Hilgardia 29:277–358
Ingles LG (1949) Ground water and snow as factors affecting the seasonal distribution of pocket gophers, Thomomys monticola. J Mammal 30:343–350
Kennerly TE (1959) Contact between the ranges of two allopatric species of pocket gophers. Evolution 13:247–263
MacArthur RH, Pianka ER (1966) On optimal use of a patchy environment. Am Nat 100:603–609
McNab BK (1966) The metabolism of fossorial rodents: A study of convergence. Ecology 47:712–733
McNab BK (1979) The influence of body size on the energetics and distribution of fossorial mammals. Ecology 60:1010–1021
Miller MA (1957) Burrows of the Sacramento Valley pocket gopher in flood-irrigated alfalfa fields. Hilgardia 26:431–452
Miller RS (1964) Ecology and distribution of pocket gophers (Geomyidae) in Colorado. Ecology 45:256–272
Pyke GH, Pulliam HR, Charnov EL (1977) Optimal foraging: A selective review of theories and tests. Quart Rev Biol 52:137–154
Ricklefs RE (1979) Ecology. 2nd edition. New York: Chiron Press
Schoener TW (1969) Models of optimal size for a solitary predator. Am Nat 103:277–313
Schoener TW (1971) Theory of feeding strategies. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 11:369–404
Vaughan TA (1963) Movements made by two species of pocket gophers. Am Midl Nat 69:367–372
Vleck D (1979) The energy cost of burrowing by the pocket gopher Thomomys bottae. Physiol Zool 52:122–135
Walker EP (1975) Mammals of the World (Vol. 2, 3rd ed.). Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
Whittaker RH (1970) Communities and Ecosystems. Macmillen New York
Wolf LL (1975) Energy intake and expenditures in a nectar-feeding sunbird. Ecology 56:92–104
Wolf LL, Hainsworth FR, Gill FB (1975) Foraging efficiencies and time budgets in nectar-feeding birds. Ecology 56:117–128
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vleck, D. Burrow structure and foraging costs in the fossorial rodent, Thomomys bottae . Oecologia 49, 391–396 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00347605
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00347605