Abstract
Modifications of soil microbiological activity by the addition of municipal solid-waste compost were studied in laboratory incubations. Three composts were compared, one lumbricompost and two classical composts with different maturation times. Organic C mineralization and nine enzyme activities (dehydrogenase, peroxidase, cellulase, β-glucosidase, β-galactosidase, N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase, protease, amidase, and urease) were determined in the composts and the amended soil. Initial enzyme activities varied in the soil according to the sampling date (winter or summer) and were greater in the composts than in the soil, except for urease. Generally, the youngest compost exhibited greater activity than the oldest one. In the amended soil, the composts did not increase enzyme activity in an additive way. Dehydrogenase, the only strictly endocellular enzyme, was the only one for which the activity in the amended soil increased significantly in proportion to the addition of compost. During the incubations, C mineralization and dehydrogenase activity were significantly correlated, indicating that dehydrogenase was a reliable indicator of global microbial activity. Peroxidase activity in the soil remained constant, but increased in the composts and amended soil. Addition of the oldest compost had no effect on the activity of the C cycle enzymes, but the youngest compost increased creased soil activity at the higher application rate. Enzymes of the N cycle were stimulated by all compost amendments, but the increase was only transient for amidase and urease. Lumbricomposting had no marked effect on compost enzyme activity, either before or during the incubation.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Alexander M (1977) Introduction to soil microbiology, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
Bartha R, Bordeleau L (1969) Cell-free peroxidases in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 1:139–143
Beyer J, DeChant L, Conditt M, Jones B (1993) Wet bag composting trial yields promising results. Biocycle 34:72–75
Beyer L, Wachendorf C, Elsner DC, Knabe R (1993) Suitability of dehydrogenase activity assay as an index of soil biological activity. Biol Fertil Soils 16:52–56
Boyd SA, Mortland MM (1990) Enzyme interactions with clays and clay-organic matter complexes. Soil Biochem 6:1–28
Brink RH, Dubach P, Lynch DL (1960) Measurement of carbohydrates in soil hydrolyzates with anthrone. Soil Sci 89:157–166
Burns RG (1982) Enzyme activity in soil: location and possible role in microbial ecology. Soil Biol Biochem 14:423–427
Businelli M, Perucci P, Patumi M, Giusquiani PL (1984) Chemical composition and enzymic activity of some worm casts. Plant Soil 80:417–422
Charlot G (1961) Dosages colorimétriques des éléments minéraux. Masson, Paris
Chaussod R, Nicolardot B, Catroux G (1986) Mesure en routine de la biomasse microbienne des sols par la méthode de fumigation au chloroforme. Sci Sol 2:201–211
Crawford DL, Doyle JD, Wang Z, Hendricks CW, Bentjen SA, Bolton H, Fredrickson JK, Bleakley BH (1993) Effects of lignin peroxidase-expressing recombinant, Streptomyces lividans TK23.1, on biogeochemical cycling and the numbers and activities of microorganisms in soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:508–518
Engels R, Hackenberg C, Stumpf U, Markus P, Krämer J (1993) Comparison of microbial dynamics in two Rhine valley soils under organic management. Biol Agric Hortic 9:325–341
Forster JC, Zech W, Würdiger E (1993) Comparison of chemical and microbiological methods for the characterization of the maturity of composts from contrasting sources. Biol Fertil Soils 16:93–99
Frankenberger WT, Dick WA (1983) Relationships between enzyme, activities and microbial growth and activity indices in soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 47:945–951
Frankenberger WT, Tabatabai MA (1980) Amidase activity in soils. I. Method of assay. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:282–287
Frankenberger WT, Tabatabai MA (1981) Amidase activity in soils. III. Stability and distribution. Soil Sci Soc Am J 45:333–338
Gallardo-Lara F, Nogales R (1987) Effect of the application of town refuse compost on the soil-plant system: a review. Biol Wastes 19:35–62
Garcia C, Hernandez T, Costa F, Ceccanti B, Ciardi C (1992) Changes in ATP content, enzyme activity and inorganic nitrogen species during composting of organic wastes. Can J Soil Sci 72:243–253
Garcia C, Hernandez T, Costa F, Ceccanti B, Ganni A (1993a) Hydrolases in the organic matter fractions of sewage sludge: Changes with composting. Bioresour Technol 45:47–52
Garcia C, Hernandez T, Costa C, Ceccanti B, Masciandaro G, Ciardi C (1993b) A study of biochemical parameters of composted and fresh municipal wastes. Bioresour Technol 44:17–23
Garcia C, Hernandez T, Costa F, Ceccanti B, Masciandaro G, Calcinai M (1993c) Evaluation of the organic matter composition of raw and composted municipal wastes. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 39:99–108
Giusquiani PL, Patumi M, Businelli M (1989) Chemical composition of fresh and composted urban waste. Plant Soil 116: 278–282
Harada Y, Inoko A (1980) Relationship between cation-exchange capacity and degree of maturity of city refuse compost. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 26:353–362
Hirai MF, Chanyasak V, Kubota H (1983) A standard measurement for compost maturity. Biocycle 24:54–56
Jimenez EI, Garcia VP (1989) Evaluation of city refuse compost maturity: a review. Biol Wastes 27:115–142
Kaiser P (1983) Analyse microbiologique des composts. Compost Information 13:1–5
Ladd JN, Butler JHA (1972) Short-term assays of soil proteolytic enzyme activities using proteins and dipeptide derivatives as substrates. Soil Biol Biochem 4:19–30
Loll MJ, Bollag JM (1983) Protein transformation in soil. Adv Agron 36:351–382
Martens DA, Johanson JB, Frankenberger WT (1992) Production and persistence of soil enzymes with repeated addition of organic residues. Soil Sci 153:53–61
Martin A, Marinissen JCY (1993) Biological and physico-chemical processes in excrements of soil animals. Geoderma 56:331–347
Moore S, Stein WH, (1954) A modified ninhydrin reagent for the photometric determination of amino acids and related compounds. J Biol Chem 211:907–913
Morel JL, Guckert A, Nicolardot B, Benistant D, Catroux G, Germon JC (1986) Étude de l'évolution des caractéristiques physicochimiques et de la stabilité biologique des ordures ménagères au cours du compostage. Agronomie 6:693–701
Nannipieri P, Pedrazzini F, Arcara PG, Piovanelli C (1979) Changes in amino acids, enzyme activities, and biomasses during soil microbial growth. Soil Sci 127:26–34
Nannipieri P, Muccini L, Ciardi C (1983) Microbial biomass and enzyme activities: Production and persistence. Soil Biol Biochem 15:679–685
Nannipieri P, Grego S, Ceccanti B (1990) Ecological significance of the biological activity in soil. Soil Biochem 6:293–355
Pancholy SK, Rice EL (1973) Soil enzymes in relation to old field succession: amylase, cellulase, invertase, dehydrogenase, and urease. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 37:47–50
Perucci P (1990) Effect of the addition of municipal solid-waste compost on microbial biomass and enzyme activities in soil. Biol Fertil Soils 10:221–226
Perucci P (1992) Enzyme activity and microbial biomass in a field soil amended with municipal refuse. Biol Fertil Soils 14:54–60
Pinck LA, Allison FE (1961) Adsorption and release of urease by and from clay minerals. Soil Sci 91:183–188
Skujins J (1967) Enzymes in soil. Soil Biochem 1: 371–414
Skujins J (1978) History of abiontic soil enzyme research. In: Burns RG (eds) Soil enzymes. Academic Press, London, pp 1–49
Tabatabai MA (1982) Soil enzymes. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) Methods of soil analysis, part 2, 2nd edn. Agronomy 9. Am Soc Agron, Madison, Wis, pp 903–947
Zucconi F, Forte M, Monaco A, Bertoldi M de (1981) Biological evaluation of compost maturity. Biocycle 22:27–29
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Serra-Wittling, C., Houot, S. & Barriuso, E. Soil enzymatic response to addition of municipal solid-waste compost. Biol Fertil Soils 20, 226–236 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00336082
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00336082