Abstract
We tested the alternative hypotheses that foraging effort will increase (energy maximizer model) or decrease (due to increased costs or risks) when food supply increased, using a Namib desert burrowing spider, Seothyra henscheli (Eresidae), which feeds mainly on ants. The web of S. henscheli has a simple geometrical configuration, comprising a horizontal mat on the sand surface, with a variable number of lobes lined with sticky silk. The sticky silk is renewed daily after being covered by wind-blown sand. In a field experiment, we supplemented the spiders' natural prey with one ant on each day that spiders had active webs and determined the response to an increase in prey. We compared the foraging activity and web geometry of prey-supplemented spiders to non-supplemented controls. We compared the same parameters in fooddeprived and supplemented spiders in captivity. The results support the “costs of foraging” hypothesis. Supplemented spiders reduced their foraging activity and web dimensions. They moulted at least once and grew rapidly, more than doubling their mass in 6 weeks. By contrast, food-deprived spiders increased foraging effort by enlarging the diameter of the capture web. We suggest that digestive constraints prevented supplemented spiders from fully utilizing the available prey. By reducing foraging activities on the surface, spiders in a prey-rich habitat can reduce the risk of predation. However, early maturation resulting from a higher growth rate provides no advantage to S. henscheli owing to the fact that the timing of mating and dispersal are fixed by climatic factors (wind and temperature). Instead, large female body size will increase fitness by increasing the investiment in young during the period of extended maternal care.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abrahams MV, Dill LM (1989) A determination of the energetic equivalence of the risk of predation. Ecology 71:999–1007
Abrams PA (1982) Functional responses of optimal foragers. Am Nat 120:382–390
Abrams PA (1991) Life history and the relationship between food availability and foraging effort. Ecology 72:1242–1252
Anderson JF (1974) Responses to starvation in the spiders Lycosa lenta Hentz and Filistata hibernalis (Hentz). Ecology 55: 576–585
Eberhard WD (1990) Function and phylogeny of spider webs. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 21:341–372
Edgar WD (1969) Prey and predators of the wolf spider Lycosa lububris. J Zool [Lond] 159: 405–411
Edgar WD (1970) Prey and feeding behaviour of adult females of the wolf spider Pardosa amentata (Clerck). Neth J Zool 20: 487–491
Gillespie RG (1981) The quest for prey by the web building spider Amaurobius similis (Blackwell). Anim Behav 29:953–954
Henschel JR (1994) Diet and foraging behaviour of huntsman spiders in the Namib dunes (Araneae: Heteropodidae). J Zool [Lond] 234: 239–251
Henschel JR, Lubin YD (1992) Environmental factors affecting the web and activity of a psammophilous spider in the Namib Desert. J Arid Environ 22: 173–189
Higgins LE, Buskirk RE (1992) A trap-building predator exhibits different tactics for different aspects of foraging behaviour. Anim Behav 44:485–499
Humphreys WF (1975) The food consumption of a wolf spider, Geolycosa godeffrovi, (Araneae: Lycosidae), in the Australian Capital Territory. Oecologia 18: 343–358
Janetos AC (1982) Active foragers versus sit-and-wait predators: a simple model. J Theor Biol 95:381–385
Louw GN, Seely MK (1982) Ecology of desert organisms. Longman, London
Lubin YD (1986) Web building and prey capture in the Uloboridae. In: Shear WA (ed) Spiders: webs, behavior, and evolution. Stanford University Press, Stanford, Calif, pp 132–171
Lubin Y, Kotzman M, Ellner S (1991) Ontogenetic and seasonal changes in webs and websites of a desert widow spider. J Arachnol 19:40–48
Lubin Y, Ellner S, Kotzman M (1993) Web relocation and habitat selection in a desert widow spider. Ecology 74: 1915–1928
Lubin YD, Henschel JR (1990) Foraging at the thermal limit: burrowing spiders (Eresidae) in the Namib Desert dunes. Oecologia 84:461–467
Mitchell WA, Abramsky Z, Kotler BK, Pinshow B, Brown JS (1990) The effect of competition on foraging activity in desert rodents: theory and experiments. Ecology 71: 844–854
Olive CW (1982) Behavioral response of a sit-and-wait predátor to spatial variation in foraging gain. Ecology 63:912–920
Pasquet A (1984) Predatory-site selection and adaptation of the trap in four species of orb-weaving spiders. Biol Behav 9:3–19
Pasquet A, Ridwan A, Leborgne R (1994) Presence of potential prey affects web-building in an orb-weaving spider Zygiella xnotata. Anim Behav 47: 477–480
Peters HM (1992) On the burrowing behaviour and the production and use of silk in Seothyra, a sand-inhabiting spider from the Namib Desert (Arachnida, Araneae, Eresidae). Verh Naturwissenschaften Ver Hamburg 33: 191–211
Rhisiart A ap, Vollrath F (1994) Design features of the orb web of the spider, Araneus diadematus. Behav Ecol 5: 280–287
Riechert SE (1981) The consequences of being territorial: spiders, a case study. Am Nat 117:871–892
Riechert SE, Harp JM (1987) Nutritional ecology of spiders. In: Slansky F Jr, Rodriguez JG (eds) Nutritional ecology of insects, mites, and spiders. Wiley New York, pp 645–672
Riechert SE, Luczak J (1982) Spider foraging: behavioral responses to prey. In: Witt PN, Rovner JS (eds) Spider communication: mechanisms of ecological significance. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp 353–385
Schneider J (1992) Die Wurzeln des Soziallebens bei der subsozialen Spinne Stegodyphus lineatus (Eresidae). PhD dissertation, Ludwig-Maximillian-Universität, Munich, Germany
Seibt U, Wickler W (1987) Gerontophagy versus cannibalism in the social spiders Stegodyphus mimosarum Pavesi and Stegodyphus dumicola Pocock. Anim Behav 35: 1903–1904
Sherman PM (1994) The orb-web: an energetic and behavioural estimator of a spider's dynamic foraging and reproductive strategics. Anim Behav 48: 19–34
Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry, 2nd edn. Freeman, New York
Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Stephens DW, Krebs JR (1986) Foraging theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Turner JS, Henschel JR, Lubin YD (1993) Thermal constraints of prey-capture behavior of a burrowing spider in a hot environment. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 33: 35–43
Uetz GW (1988) Risk sensitivity and foraging in colonial spiders. In: Slobodchikoff CN (ed) The ecology of social behavior. Academic Press, London, pp 353–377
Uetz GW (1991) Habitat structure and spider foraging. In: Bell SS, McCoy ED, Mushinsky HR (eds) Habitat structure: the physical arrangement of objects in space. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 325–348
Uetz GW (1992) Foraging strategies of spiders. Trends Ecol Evol 7: 155–159
Vollrath F (1985) Web spider's dilemma: a risky move or site dependent growth. Oecologia 68: 69–72
Vollrath F (1987) Growth, foraging and reproductive success. In: Nentwig W (ed) Ecophysiology of spiders. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 355–370
Ward D, Lubin Y (1992) Temporal and spatial segregation of webbuilding in a community of orb-weaving spiders. J Arachnol 20: 73–87
Ward D, Lubin Y (1993) Habitat selection and the life history of a desert spider, Stegodyphus lineatus (Eresidae). J Anim Ecol 62: 353–363
Wise DH (1979) Effects of an experimental increase in prey abundance upon the reproductive rates of two orb-weaving spider species (Araneae: Araneidae). Oecologia 41: 289–300
Wise DH (1993) Spiders in ecological webs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Witt PN, Baum R (1960) Changes in orb webs in spiders during growth (Araneus diadematus Clerck and Neoscona vertebrata McCook). Behaviour 16: 309–318
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lubin, Y., Henschel, J. The influence of food supply on foraging behaviour in a desert spider. Oecologia 105, 64–73 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328792
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328792