Abstract
Nest defence intensity and nestling provisioning effort of female willow tits (Parus montanus) were significantly correlated at the end of nestling period: well-fed young were defended most intensely. Increased effort was rewarded, since broods with the highest female per-offspring provisioning rates were the most likely to produce local recruits. This suggests that the feeding ability is an important cue for parental investment decisions, at least in a species like the willow tit which has adopted the clutch adjustment strategy. Thus, the most valuable broods would not necessarily be the largest ones, but the ones in which the original number of young could be fed most adequately. However, no associations were found between the level of parental effort and offspring weight, size or condition, nor did the broods producing recruits differ from other broods in timing of breeding or number and size of offspring. The female behaviour may suggest that they invest the most time, energy and risk in the young whose chances of joining the winter flock are the best. The first well-fed young also gain an advantage of prior residency in joining the flock. The first to join normally obtain higher social status, and hence better winter survival, than latecomers. The corresponding patterns in male parental investment behaviour were weak or absent, which suggested that the male effort was affected by the female behaviour. Males seemed to invest in nestling provisioning in such a way as to supplement the female effort. During nest defence action males also seemed to invest in protection of females against predation.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Blancher PJ, Robertson RJ (1982) Kingbird aggression: does it deter predation? Anim Behav 30: 929–930
Clutton-Brock T, Godfray C (1991) Parental investment. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology. An evolutionary approach. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 234–262
Conrad KF, Robertson JR (1993) Brood size and the cost of provisioning nestlings: interpreting Lack's hypothesis. Occologia 96: 290–292
Curio E, Regelmann K (1985) The behavioural dynamics of great tit (Parus major) approaching a predator. Z Tierpsychol 69: 3–18
Ekman J (1990) Alliances in winter flocks of willow tits: effects of rank on survival and reproductive success in male-female associations. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 26: 239–245
Ekman J, Askenmo C (1984) Social rank and habitat use in willow tit groups. Anim Behav 32: 508–514
Fretwell SD, Bowen DE, Hespenheide HA (1974) Growth rates of young passerines and the flexibility of clutch size. Ecology 55: 907–909
Greenwood PJ (1980) Mating systems, philopatry and dispersal in birds and mammals. Anim Behav 28: 1140–1162
Greig-Smith PW (1980) Parental investment in nest defence by stonechats (Saxicola torquata). Anim Behav 28: 604–619
Gustafsson L (1985) Fitness factors in the collared flycatcher Ficedula albicollis Temm. Ph D Thesis, University of Uppsala
Gustafsson L (1990) Life-history trade-offs and optimal clutch size in relation to age in the collared flycatcher. In: Blondel J, Gosler A, Lebreton JD, McCleery R (eds) Population biology of passerine birds, an intergrated approach (NATO ASI Ser G: Ecological Science 24). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 235–245
Hogstad O (1988) Rank-related recourse access in winter flocks of willow tit Parus montanus. Ornis Scand 19: 169–174
Hogstad O (1990) Dispersal date and settlement of juvenile willow tits Parus montanus in winter flocks. Fauna Norv Ser C Cinclus 13: 49–55
Hogstad O (1995) Alarm calling by willow tits, Parus montanus, as mate investment. Amin Behav 49: 221–225
Knight RL, Temple SA (1986) Methodological problems in studies of avian nest defence. Anim Behav 34: 561–566
Koivula K, Orell M (1988) Social rank and winter survival in the willow tit Parus montanus. Ornis Fenn 65: 114–120
Koivula K, Lahti K, Orell M, Rytkönen S (1993) Prior residency as a key determinant of social dominance in the willow tit Parus montanus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 33: 283–287
Koivula K, Lahti K, Rytkönen S, Orell M (1994) Do subordinates expose themselves for predation: field experiments on feeding site selection of willow tits. J Avian Biol 25: 178–183
Lazarus J, Inglis IR (1986) Shared and unshared parental investment, parent-offspring conflict and brood size. Anim Behav 34: 1791–1804
Lessells CM (1991) The evolution of life-histories. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology. An evolutionary approach. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 32–68
Linden M (1988) Reproductive trade-off between first and second clutches in the great tit Parus major: an experimental study. Oikos 51: 285–290
Magrath RD (1991) Nestling weight and juvenile survival in the blackbird, Turdus merula. J Anim Ecol 60: 335–351
Martin TE (1992) Interaction of nest predation and food limitation in reproductive strategies. Curr Ornithol 9: 163–197
Maynard Smith J (1977) Parental investment: a prospective analysis. Anim Behav 25: 1–9
McCleery RH, Perrins CM (1988) Lifetime reproductive success of the great tit Parus major. In: Clutton-Brock TH (ed) Reproductive success. University of Chigago Press, London, pp 136–153
Montgemerie RD, Weatherhead PJ (1988) Risks and rewards of nest defence by parent birds. Q Rev Biol 63: 167–187
Morris WM (1987) Optimal allocation of parental investment. Oikos 49: 332–339
NAG (1986) The GLIM system release 3.77 manual. Numerical Algorithms-Group, Oxford
Nur N (1984) Feeding frequencies of nestling blue tits (Parus caeruleus): costs, benefits and a model of optimal feeding frequency. Oecologia 65: 125–137
O'Connor RJ (1978) Growth strategies in nestling passerines. Living Bird 16: 209–238
Orell M, Koivula K (1988) Cost of reproduction: parental survival and production of recruits in the willow tit Parus montanus. Oecologia 77: 423–432
Orell M, Koivula K (1990) Effects of brood size manipulations on adult and juvenile survival and future fecundity in the willow tit. In: Blondel J, Gosler A, Lebreton JD, McCleery R (eds) Population biology of passerine birds, an integrated approach. (NATO ASI Ser G: Ecological Science 24). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 297–306
Orell M, Ojanen M (1983a) Breeding biology and population dynamics of the willow tit Parus montanus. Ann Zool Fenn 20: 90–114
Orell M, Ojanen M (1983b) Timing and length of the breeding season of the great tit, Parus major, and the willow tit, P. montanus, near Oulu, northern Finland. Ardea 71: 183–198
Orell M, Koivula K, Rytkönen S, Lahti K (1994) To breed or not to breed: causes and implications of non-breeding habit in the willow tit Parus montanus. Oecologia 100: 339–346
Orians GH, Pearson NE (1979) On the theory of central place foraging. In: Horn DJ, Mitchell RD, Stairs CR (eds) Analysis of ecological systems. Ohio State University Press, Columbia, pp 154–177
PerrinsCM (1965) Population fluctuations and clutch-size in the great tit, Parus major L. J Anim Ecol 34: 601–647
Ricklefs RE (1984) The optimization of growth rate in altricial birds. Ecology 65: 1602–1616
Rytkönen S, Koivula K, Orell M (1990) Temporal increase in nest defence intensity of the willow tit Parus montanus: parental investment or methodological artifact? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 27: 283–286
Rytkönen S, Orell M, Koivula K (1993) Sex-role reversal in willow tit nest defence. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 33: 275–282
Rytkönen S, Orell M, Koivula K (1995) Pseudo Concorde fallacy in the willow tit? Anim Behav 49: 1017–1028
Slagsvold T, Lifjeld JT (1990) Influence of male and female quality on clutch size in tits (Parus spp.). Ecology 71: 1258–1266
Smith HG (1993) Seasonal decline in clutch size of the marsh tit (Parus palustris) in relation to date-specific survival of offspring. Auk 110: 889–899
Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man. Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago, pp 136–179
Winkler DW (1987) A general model for parental care. Am Nat 130: 526–543
Winkler DW (1991) Parental investment decision rules in tree swallows: parental defence, abandonment, and the so-called Concorde fallacy. Behav Ecol 2: 133–142
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rytkönen, S., Orell, M., Koivula, K. et al. Correlation between two components of parental investment: nest defence intensity and nestling provisioning effort of willow tits. Oecologia 104, 386–393 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328375
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328375