Summary
In order to investigate the reproducibility of grading systems for prostatic carcinoma currently in use, a comparative histological grading study was done. These studies were carried out on tissue sections from radical prostatectomy specimens (N=50) stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Five pathologists with varying professional experience participated in the study, using five different grading systems: those of Broders, Brawn, Gleason (for statistical compilation the modified version), Mostofi, and a modified Mostofi grading method recently described by Schroeder and Mostofi. Weighted kappa coefficients ranged from 0.21 to 0.52. None of the systems investigated demonstrated a high degree of reproducibility (k>0.70). Reproducibility of the systems described by Broders and Brawn was reasonably good (k=0.52 and 0.41, respectively). With the modified Gleason method (rearrangement of Gleason scores into 3 grades), a considerable difference was noted between the numerical agreement score (among at least 3 observers) and the measured kappa value (100% and 0.30, respectively). The methods described by Mostofi and Schroeder-Mostofi revealed only limited reproducibility (k=0.21 and 0.34, respectively).
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Albertsen P (1982) Histologic grading and the practicing urologist. The Prostate 3:333
Babaian RJ, Grunow WA (1985) Reliability of Gleason grading system in comparing prostate biopsies with total prostatectomy specimens. Urology 25:564
Bain GO, Koch M, Hanson J (1982) Feasibility of grading prostatic carcinomas. Arch Pathol Lab Med 106:265
Belt E, Schroeder FH (1972) Total perineal prostatectomy for carcinoma of the prostate. J Urol 107:91
Böcking A, Kiehn J, Heinzel-Wach M (1982) Combined histologic grading of prostatic carcinoma. Cancer 50:288
Brawn PN, Ayala AG, Von Eschenbach AC, Hussey DH, Johnson DE (1982) Histologic grading study of a new system and comparison with other methods — a preliminary study. Cancer 49:525
Broders AC (1926) Grading and practical application. Arch Path and Lab Med 1:376
Catalona WJ (1984) Prostatic Cancer. Grune and Stratton, Orlando
Diamond DA, Berry SJ, Umbricht C, Jewett HJ, Coffey DS (1982) Computerized image analysis of nuclear shape as a prognostic factor for prostatic cancer. The Prostate 3:321
Diamond DA, Berry SJ, Jewett HJ, Eggleston JC, Coffey DS (1982) A new method to assess metastatic potential of human prostate cancer: Relative nuclear roundness. J Urol 128:729
Emmett JL, Greene LF, Papantoniou A (1960) Endocrine therapy in carcinoma of the prostate gland: ten year survival studies. J Urol 83:471
Epstein JI, Berry SJ, Eggleston JC (1984) Nuclear roundness factor: A predictor of progression in untreated stage A2 prostate cancer. Cancer 54:1666
Epstein NA, Fatti LP (1976) Prostatic carcinoma: Some morphological features affecting prognosis. Cancer 37:2455
Fowler JE Jr, Mills SE (1985) Operable prostatic carcinoma: Correlations among clinical stage, pathological stage, Gleason histological score and early disease-free survival. J Urol 133:49
Gaeta JF (1981) Glandular profiles and cellular patterns in prostatic cancer grading. Urology [Suppl] 17:33
Gaeta JF, Englander LC, Murphy GP (1986) Comparative evaluation of national prostatic cancer treatment group and Gleason systems for pathologic grading of prostatic cancer. Urology 27:306
Gardner WA Jr (1982) Histologic grading of prostate cancer: A retrospective and prospective overview. The Prostate 3:555
Gleason DF (1966) Classification of prostatic carcinomas. Cancer Chemother Rep 50:125
Gleason DF, Mellinger GT, The Veterans Administration Cooperative Urological Research Group (1974) Prediction of prognosis for prostatic adenocarcinoma by combined histological grading and clinical staging. J Urol 111:58
Gleason DF, The Veterans Administration Cooperative Urological Research Group (1977) Histologic grading and clinical staging of prostatic carcinoma. In: Tannenbaum M (ed) Urologic Pathology: The Prostate, Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, pp 177–198
Grayhack JT, Assimos DG (1983) Prognostic significance of tumor grade and stage in the patient with carcinoma of the prostate. The Prostate 4:13
Guinan P, Talluri K, Nagubadi S, Sharifi R, Ray V, Shaw M (1983) Evaluation of Gleason classification system in prostate cancer. Urol 21:458
Harada M, Mostofi FK, Corle DK, Byar DP, Trump BF (1977) Preliminary studies of histologic prognoses in cancer of the prostate. Cancer Treat Rep 61:223
Kramer SA, Spahr J, Brendler CB, Glenn JF, Paulson DF (1980) Experience with Gleason's histopathologic grading in prostatic cancer. J Urol 124:223
Mellinger GT, Gleason D, Bailar J (1967) The histology and prognosis of prostatic cancer. J Urol 97:331
Mills SE, Fowler JE (1986) Gleason histologic grading of prostatic carcinoma; correlations between biopsy and prostatectomy specimens. Cancer 57:346
Mostofi FK (1975) Grading of prostatic carcinoma. Cancer Chem Rep 59:111
Mostofi FK (1976) Problems of grading carcinoma of the prostate. Sem in Oncol 3:161
Murphey GP, Whitmore WF (1979) A report of the workshops on the current status of the histologic grading of prostate cancer. Cancer 44:1490
Myers RP, Neves RJ, Farrow GM, Utz D (1982) Nucleolar grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma: light-microscopic correlation with disease progression. The Prostate 3:42
Schouten HJA (1982) Measuring pairwise interobserver agreement when all subjects are judged by the same observers. Statistica Neerlandica 36:45
Schroeder FH, Belt E (1975) Carcinoma of the prostate: a study of 213 patients with stage C tumors treated by total perineal prostatectomy. J Urol 114:257
Schroeder FH, Blom JHM, Hop WCJ, Mostofi FK (1985) Grading of prostatic cancer: I. An analysis of the prognostic significance of single characteristics. The Prostate 6:81
Schroeder FH, Blom JHM, Hop WCJ, Mostofi FK (1985) Grading of prostatic cancer: II. The prognostic significance of the presence of multiple architectural patterns. The Prostate 6:403
Schroeder FH, Hop WCJ, Blom JHM, Mostofi FK (1985) Grading of prostatic cancer: III. Multivariate analysis of prognostic parameters. The Prostate 7:13
Smith PH, Robinson MRG, Coopers EH (1976) Carcinoma of the prostate, a focal point for divergent disciplines. Eur J Cancer 12:937
Sogani PC, Israel A, Lieberman PH, Lesser ML, Whitmore WF (1985) Gleason grading of prostate cancer: a predictor of survival. Urology 25:223
Tannenbaum M, Tannenbaum S, DeSanctis PN, Olsson CA (1982) Prognostic significance of nucleolar surface area in prostate cancer. Urology 19:546
Wilson JWL, Morales A, Bruce AW (1983) The prognostic significance of histological grading and pathological staging in carcinoma of the prostate. J Urol 130:481
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
ten Kate, F.J.W., Gallee, M.P.W., Schmitz, P.I.M. et al. Problems in grading of prostatic carcinoma: interobserver reproducibility of five different grading systems. World J Urol 4, 147–152 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00327011
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00327011