Summary
In the laboratory and field, we examined how periphyton (food of snails) and predatory crayfish influenced snail distribution in Trout Lake, a permanent, northern Wisconsin lake. Laboratory experiments (with no crayfish) tested the importance of periphyton biomass in determining snail preference among rocks, and among rock, sand, and macrophyte substrates. Among rocks with four different amounts of periphyton, periphyton biomass and the number of Lymnaea emarginata, Physa spp., and Amnicola spp. were positively related. A similar, but non-significant, trend occurred for Helisoma anceps. A field experiment at a site in Trout Lake where predation risk was low confirmed the preference by snails for periphyton covered rocks; more snails colonized rocks with periphyton than rocks without. When given a choice of rock, sand, and macrophytes in the laboratory, L. emarginata preferred high periphyton biomass and rock. Laboratory and field results contrasted with the distribution of snails in Trout Lake; no snails occurred in areas with abundant periphyton-covered rocks, but snails were abundant nearby on scattered rocks with little periphyton. However, where snails were absent, crayfish were abundant (14.5 crayfish-trap−1-day−1), and where snails were abundant, crayfish were rare (3.2 crayfish-trap−1-day−1), suggesting that crayfish predation reduced snails. The hypothesis that the negative association between snail and periphyton biomass resulted from snail grazing was supported by the results of a field snail enclosure-exclosure experiment (1 m2 cages; n=3). All experiments and observations therefore suggest that: 1) crayfish predation is more important than a preference for high periphyton biomass in determining snail distribution in Trout Lake; 2) periphyton biomass is negtively related to snail grazing; and 3) crayfish had a positive indirect effect on periphyton by preying on grazing snails.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Boag DA (1986) Dispersal in pond snails: potential role of water-fowl. Can J Zool 64:904–909
Brönmark C (1985) Interactions between macrophytes, epiphytes and herbivores: an experimental approach. Oikos 45:26–30
Brooks JL, Dodson SI (1965) Predation, body size, and composition of plankton. Science 150:28–35
Carpenter SR, Kitchell JF, Hodgson JR, Cochran PA, Elser JJ, Elser MM, Lodge DM, Kretchmer D, He X, Ende CN von (1987) Regulation of lake primary productivity by food web structure. Ecology 68:1863–1876
Cattaneo A (1983) Grazing on epiphytes. Limnol Oceanogr 28:124–132
Cattaneo A (1987) Periphyton in lakes of different trophy. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 44:296–303
Cattaneo A, Kalff J (1986) The effect of grazer size manipulation on periphyton communities. Oecologia 69: 612–617
Clampitt PT (1973) Substratum as a factor in the distribution of pulmonate snails in Douglas Lake, Michigan. Malacologia 12:379–399
Clampitt PT (1974) Seasonal migratory cycle and related movements of the freshwater pulmonate snail, Physa integra. Am Midl Nat 92:275–300
Crowder LB, Cooper WE (1982) Habitat structural complexity and the interaction between bluegills and their prey. Ecology 63:1802–1813
Crowder LB, Drenner RW, Kerfoot WC, McQueen DJ, Mills EL, Sommer U, Specer CN, Vanni MJ (1988) Food web interactions in lakes. In: Carpenter SR (ed) Complex interactions in lake communities. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 141–160
Gilinsky E (1984) The role of fish predation and spatial heterogeneity in determining benthic community structure. Ecology 65:455–468
Hairston NG, Smith FE, Slobodkin (1960) Community structure, population control and competition. Am Nat 94:421–425
Haynes A, Taylor BJR, Varley ME (1985) The influence of the mobility of Potamopyrgus jenkinsi (Smith, EA) (Prosobronchia: Hydrobiidae) on its spread. Arch Hydrobiol 103:497–508
Holm-Hansen O, Riemann B (1978) Chlorophyll a determination: improvements in methodology. Oikos 30:438–447
Jones RC, Adams MS (1982) Seasonal variation in photosynthetic response of algae epiphytic on Myriophyllum spicatum L. Aquat Bot 13:317–330
Kerfoot WC (1987) Cascading effects and indirect pathways. In: Kerfoot WC, Sih A (eds) Predation: direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities. University Press of New England, Hanover, pp 57–71
Kesler DH (1981) Periphyton grazing by Amnicola limosa: an enclosure-exclosure experiment. Freshwater Ecol 1:51–59
Lamberti GA, Moore JW (1984) Aquatic insects as primary consumers. In: Resh VH, Rosenberg DM (eds) The ecology of aquatic insects. Praeger Publishers, New York, pp 164–195
Lind OT (1979) Handbook of common methods in limnology. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 98–99
Lodge DM, Brown KM, Klosiewski SP, Stein RA, Covich AP, Leathers BKE, Bronmark C (1987) Distribution of freshwater snails: spatial scale and the relative importance of physicochemical and biotic factors. Am Malac Bull 5:73–84
Lodge DM, Kratz TK, Capelli GM (1986) Long-term dynamics of three crayfish species in Trout Lake, Wisconsin. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 43: 993–998
Loeb SL (1981) An in situ method for measuring the primary productivity and standing crop of the epilithic periphyton community in lentic systems. Limnol Oceanogr 26:394–399
Mills EL, Forney JL, Wagner KJ (1987) Fish predation and its cascading effects on the Oneida lake food chain. In: Kerfoot WC, Sih A (eds) Predation: direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities. University Press of New England, Hannover, pp 118–132
Mills EL, Forney JL (1988) Trophic dynamics and development of pelagic food webs. In: Carpenter SR (ed) Complex interactions in lake communities. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 11–30
Morin PJ (1984) Odonate guild composition: experiments with colonization history and fish predation. Ecology 65:1866–1873
Paine RT (1980) Food webs: linkage, interaction strength and community infrastructure. J Anim Ecol 49:667–685
Power ME (1987) Predator avoidance by grazing fishes in temperate and tropical streams: importance of stream depth and prey size. In: Kerfoot WC, Sih A (eds) Predation: direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities. University Press of New England, Hannover, pp 323–353
Ribi G (1986) Within-lake dispersal of the prosobranch snails, Viviparus ater and Potamopyrgus jenkinsi. Oecologia 69:60–63
Schindler DW (1978) Factors regulating phytoplankton production and standing crop in the world's lakes. Limnol Oceanogr 23:478–486
Shapiro J, Wright DI (1984) Lake restoration by biomanipulation: Round Lake, Minnesota, the first two years. Freshwat Biol 14:371–383
Sih A, Crowley P, McPeck M, Petranka J, Strohmeier K (1985) Predation, competition, and prey communities: a review of field experiments. Am Rev Ecol Syst 16:269–311
Stein R (1977) Selective predation, optimal foraging, and the predator-prey interaction between fish and crayfish. Ecology 58:1237–1253
Stein RA, Magnuson JJ (1976) Behavioral response by crayfish to a fish predator. Ecology 57:751–761
Sterry PR, Thomas JD, Patience RL (1983) Behavioural responses of Biomphalaria glabrata (Say) to chemical factors from aquatic macrophytes including decaying Lemna paucicostata (Hegelm ex Engelm). Freshw Biol 13:465–476
Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry. Freeman and Co., New York, p 859
Strickland JH, Parsons TR (1968) A practical handbook of seawater analysis. Bull Fish Res Bd Can 167, pp 117–124
Vaidya DP (1979) Substratum as a factor in the distribution of two prosobranch freshwater snails, Viviparus bengalensis and Melania scabra. Hydrobiologia 65:17–18
Wetzel RG (1983) Limnology 2nd ed. Saunders College Publishing, Philadelphia, PA 767 pp
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weber, L.M., Lodge, D.M. Periphytic food and predatory crayfish: relative roles in determining snail distribution. Oecologia 82, 33–39 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00318530
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00318530