Summary
Effects of various stimulus variables on the Zöllner illusion were investigated. 1) The illusion was maximal when both the stimulus figure and the comparison stimulus were oriented 45 degrees to the vertical. 2) It decreased as the gap between the oblique lines and the parallel lines increased, reaching zero at a gap of 24 to 48 min. 3) It increased as the length of the oblique lines increased and reached an asymptote when the perpendicular distance from the end of the oblique lines to the parallel lines was about 45 min. 4) It always varied systematically with the intersect angle, but the optimal angle varied from 15 to 30 degrees according to the conditions of the gap and the length of oblique lines. 5) Considerable illusions were obtained even when the stimulus figure was reduced to a single line intersected by oblique lines. 6) Negative illusions were obtained with the intersect angle of 10 degrees. 7) These results supported a view that the Zöllner illusion is caused by neural interactions among direction analyzers in the cortex.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Békésy, G. von: Sensory inhibition. New Jersey: Princeton University Press 1967
Gregory, R. L.: Distortion of visual space as inappropriate constancy scaling. Nature (Lond.) 199, 678–680 (1963)
Heymans, G.: Quantitative Untersuchungen über die Zöllnersche und die Loebsche Täuschung. Z. Psychol. 14, 101–139 (1897)
Hubel, D. H., Wiesel, T. N.: Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 160, 106–154 (1962)
Imai, S.: An experiment on the negative Zöllner illusion. Jimbun Gakuho (Tokyo Metropolitan Univ.) 30, 31–43 (In Japanese) (1962)
Judd, C. H., Courten, H. C.: The Zöllner illusion. Psychol. Monogr. 7, 112–139 (1905)
Leibowitz, H., Toffey, S.: The effect of rotation and tilt on the magnitude of the Poggendorff illusion. Vision Res. 6, 101–103 (1966)
Morinaga, S.: Untersuchungen über die Zöllnerische Täuschung. Jap. J. Psychol. 8, Japanese text, 195–242; German summary, 23–25 (1933)
Motokawa, K.: Field of retinal induction and optical illusions. J. Neurophysiol. 13, 413–426 (1950)
Obonai, T.: Experimentelle Untersuchungen über den Aufbau des Sehraumes. Arch. ges. Psychol. 82, 308–328 (1931)
Oyama, T.: Japanese studies on the so-called geometrical-optical illusions. Psychologia 3, 7–20 (1960)
Robinson, J. O.: The psychology of visual illusion. London: Huntchinton University Library 1972
Tausch, R.: Optische Täuschung als artifizielle Effekte der Gestaltungsprozesse von Größen- und Formkonstanz in der natürlichen Raumwahrnehmung. Psychol. Forsch. 24, 299–348 (1954)
Wallace, G. K.: Measurements of the Zöllner illusion. Acta Psychologica 22, 407–412 (1964)
Wallace, G. K.: The effect of background on the Zöllner illusion. Acta psychol. (Amst.) 25, 373–380 (1966)
Wallace, G. K.: The critical distance of interaction in the Zöllner illusion. Perc. and Psychophys. 5, 261–264 (1969)
Wallace, G. K., Crampin, D. J.: The effect of background density on the Zöllner illusion. Vision Res. 9, 167–177 (1969)
Weintraub, D. J., Krantz, D. H.: The Poggendorff illusion: Amputions, rotations, and other perturbations. Perc. and Psychophys. 10, 257–264 (1971)
Zöllner, F.: Über eine neue Art von Pseudoskopie und ihre Beziehungen zu den von Plateau und Oppel beschriebenen Bewegungsphänomenen. Ann. phys. Chem. 186, 500–523 (1860)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Parts of this study were presented at the 35th and 36th Annual Conventions of the Japanese Psychological Association, September, 1971 and August, 1972. The author is greatly indebted to Noboru Sakaba, Fusako Wada, Mamoru Kitagawa, and Masanori Motoki for their assistance in running experiments.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oyama, T. Determinants of the Zöllner illusion. Psychol. Res 37, 261–280 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309038
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309038