Summary
In the laboratory the neotropical bat, Pteronotus p. parnellii of Jamaica W.I., will readily capture free flying and tethered insects. It will also attack a stationary mechanical insect model when its wing-like parts are rapidly moving. On the basis of our observations we conclude that:
-
1.
P. parnellii are attracted to flying insects and recognition of these rather than background objects is dependent on insect wing movements. Insects which are not beating wings are relatively immune from predation.
-
2.
The frequency of the wingbeats of the insects is important in prey recognition. P. parnellii are not attracted to insects or to mechanical models of insects when the wing movements are slow.
-
3.
These bats are selective in the acquisition of their prey and not simply opportunistic. They ignore or reject lampyrid beetles, arctiid and ctenuchid moths and the geometrid moth, Thyrinteina arnobia. They consume a variety of other Lepidoptera, Coleoptera, and insects from other orders. Their prey consists of both large and small insects.
-
4.
In spite of the emission of intense sonar pulses with a constant frequency component of long duration, they can effectively hunt their prey in relatively confined spaces. They can chase their prey among simple arrays of obstacles and they can pursue insects to within several centimeters of large obstacles.
-
5.
Evidence supports the hypothesis that the basis for insect wingbeat detection is the rapid and repetitive pattern of Doppler-shifts which the beating wings impose on the echoes of the constant frequency component of the bat's pulses.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bateman, G.C., Vaughan, T.A.: Nightly activities of mormoopid bats. J. Mammal. 55, 45–65 (1974)
Dunning, D.C.: Warning sounds of moths. Z. Tierpsychol. 25, 129–138 (1968)
Dunning, D.C., Roeder, K.D.: Moth sounds and the insect-catching behavior of bats. Science 147, 173–174 (1965)
Grinnell, A.D.: Mechanisms of overcoming interference in echolocating animals. In: Animal sonar systems, biology and bionics, Vol. 1 (ed. R.-G. Busnel), pp. 451–481. Jouy-en-Josas 78, France: Lab. Physiol. Acoust., INRA-CNRZ 1967
Grinnell, A.D.: comparative auditory neurophysiology of neotropical bats employing different echolocation signals. Z. vergl. Physiol. 68, 117–153 (1970)
Henson, M.M.: Unusual nerve-fiber distribution in the cochlea of the bat Pteronotus p. parnellii. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 53, 1739–1740 (1973)
Henson, O.W., Jr.: The ear and audition. In: Biology of bats, Vol. II (ed. W.A. Wimsatt), pp. 181–262. New York: Academic Press 1970
Henson, O.W., Jr., Goldman, L.J.: Prey detection and physiological aspects of the cochlea in the bat, Pteronotus p. parnellii. Anat. Rec. 184, 425 (1976)
Henson, O.W. Jr., Pollak, G.D., Johson, R.A., Goldman, L.J.: Specialized properties of the auditory system in the bat Pteronotus p. parnellii. Anat. Rec. 107, 373 (1974)
Lloyd, J.E.: Firefly parasites and predators. Coleopterists Bull. 27, 91–106 (1973)
Novick, A.: Orientation in neotropical bats. II. Phyllostomatidae and Desmodontidae. J. Mammal. 44, 44–56 (1963)
Novick, A., Vaisnys, I.R.: Echolocation of flying insects by the bat Chilonycteris parnellii. Biol. Bull. 127, 478–488 (1964)
Pollak, G.D., Henson, O.W., Jr., Novick, A.: Cochlear microphonic audiograms in the “pure tone” bat, Chilonycteris parnellii parnellii. Science 176, 66–68 (1972)
Pye, J.D.: Discussion of paper by J.W.R. Griffiths: Theories of sonar systems in relation to biological organisms. In: Animal sonar systems, biology and bionics, Vol. I (ed. R.-G. Busnel), p. 1133. Jouy-en-Josas 78, France: Lab. Physiol. Acoust. INRA-CNRZ 1967
Ross, A.: Ecological aspects of the food habits of insectivorous bats. Proc. West. Found. Vert. Zoologists. 1, 205–263 (1967)
Sales, G., Pye, J.D.: Ultrasonic communication by animals. London: Chapman and Hall 1974
Schnitzler, H.U.: Comparison of the echolocation behavior in Rhinolophus ferrumequinum and Chilonycteris rubiginosa. Bijdr. Dierk. 40, 77–80 (1970)
Schuller, G.: Echoortung bei Rhinolophus ferrumequinum mit frequenzmodulierten Lauten. J. comp. Physiol. 77, 306–331 (1972)
Suga, N., Simmons, J.A., Jen, P.H.S.: Peripheral specialization for fine analysis of Doppler-shifted echoes in the auditory system of the CF-FM bat Pteronotus parnellii. J. exp. Biol. 63, 161–192 (1975)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goldman, L.J., Henson, O.W. Prey recognition and selection by the constant frequency bat, Pteronotus p. parnellii . Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2, 411–419 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299509
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299509