Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the somatic preferences of males and females for detailed anatomical drawings of female stimulus figures to examine their ability to predict the preferences for members of the opposite sex. The figures were systematically varied on three dimensions (bust, waist, and hips), with three sizes of each (small, medium, and large). The 12 figures were rated by 100 male and female subjects on a 7-point bipolar construct scale, ranging from extremely attractive to extremely unattractive. This was done both for the subjects' personal perceptions and for their predicted ratings of the opposite sex. Multivariate and univariate analyses yielded several sex, rating-perceptive (self vs. other), figure shape differences and interactions. Male subjects displayed a preference for large busts and hourglass shapes, which are accurately predicted by the females. Males predicted that females would rate slimmer figure highly, and females predicted that males would rate larger figures highly. The results are considered in light of related research in this area.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Beck, S., Ward-Hull, C., & McLear, P. (1976). Variables related to women's somatic preferences of the male and female body. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 1200–1210.
Boskind-Lodahl, M. (1976). Cinderella's stepsisters: A feminist perspective on anorexia nervosa and bulimia. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 2, 342–356.
Branch, H., & Eurman, L. (1980). Social attitudes toward patients with anorexia. American Journal of Psychology, 137, 631–632.
Brenner, D., & Hinsdale, G. (1978). Body build stereotypes and self-identification in three age groups of females. Adolescence, 13, 551–561.
Calden, G., Lundy, R., & Schlafer, R. (1959). Sex differences in body concepts. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 23, 378.
Cash, T., & Green, G. (1986). Body weight and body image among college women: Perception, cognition and affect. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50, 290–301.
Davies, E., & Furnham, A. (1986). The dieting and body shape concerns of adolescent females. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 27, 417–428.
Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285–290.
Fallon, A., & Rozin, P. (1985). Sex differences in perceptions of desirable body shape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 102–105.
Fonagy, P., & Benster, R. (1990). The psychophysics of sex differences in body image. British Journal of Psychology, 81, 159–171.
Furnham, A., & Alibhai, N. (1983). Cross cultural differences in the perception of female body shapes. Psychological Medicine, 13, 829–837.
Furnham, A., & Kramers, M. (1989). Eating-problem patients' conceptions of normality. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 150, 147–153.
Furnham, A., & Radley, S. (1989). Sex differences in the perception of male and female body shapes. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 653–662.
Garfinkel, P., & Garner, D. (1982). Anorexia nervosa: A multi dimensional perspective. New York: Bruer.
Garner, D., & Garfinkel, P. (1979). The Eating Attitudes Test: An index of symptoms of anorexia. Psychological Medicine, 9, 273–279.
Garner, D., Garfinkel, P., Schwartz, D., & Thompson M. (1980). Cultural expectations of thinness in women. Psychological Reports, 47, 483–491.
Gitter, A., Lomranz, J., Saxe, L., & Bar-Tal, D. (1983). Perceptions of female physique characteristics by American and Israeli students. Journal of Social Psychology, 121, 7–13.
Gray, S. (1977). Social aspects of body image: Perceptions of normality of weight and affect of college undergraduates. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 10, 503–516.
Harris, M., Harris, R., & Bochner, S. (1982). Fat, four-eyed and female: Stereotypes of obesity, glasses and gender. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10, 503–516.
Harris, M., & Smith, S. (1982). Beliefs about obesity: Effects of age, ethnicity, sex and weight. Psychological Reports, 51, 1047–1055.
Kleinke, C., & Staneski, R. (1980). First impressions of female bust size. Journal of Social Psychology, 110, 123–134.
Laslett, B., & Warren, C. (1975). Losing weight: The organizational promotion of behaviour change. Social Problems 23, 69–80.
Lerner, R., & Gellert, E. (1969). Body build identification, preference and aversion in children. Developmental Psychology, 1, 456–462.
Staffieri, R. (1972). Body build and behavioral expectations in young females. Developmental Psychology, 6, 125–127.
Stager, P., & Burke, P. (1982). A re-examination of body build stereotypes. Journal of Research in Personality, 16, 435–446.
Striegel-Moore, R., Silberstein, L., & Rodin, J. (1986). Toward an understanding of risk factors for bulimia. American Psychologist, 41, 241–263.
Stunkard, A. (1977). Obesity and the social environment: Current status, future prospects. Proceedings of the New York Academy of Science, 30, 298–320.
Tucker, L. (1985). Dimensionality and factor satisfaction of the body image construct: A gender comparison. Sex Roles, 12, 931–937.
Wiggins, J., Wiggins, N., & Conger, J. (1968). Correlates of heterosexual somatic preference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 82–90.
Wildman, R., Wildman, R., Brown, A., & Trice, C. (1976). Notes on males' and females' preferences for opposite sex body-parts, bust-sizes, and bust revealing clothing. Psychological Reports, 38, 485–486.
Worsley, A. (1981a). Teenagers perceptions of fat and slim people. International Journal of Obesity, 5, 15–26.
Worsley, A. (1981b). In the eye of the beholder: Social and personal characteristics of teenagers, and their impressions of themselves and fat/slim people. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 54, 231–242.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Furnham, A., Hester, C. & Weir, C. Sex differences in the preferences for specific female body shapes. Sex Roles 22, 743–754 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292058
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292058