Abstract
Females tend to score lower than males on measures of computer aptitude and attitudes. This study examined the potential effects of several mediating factors, sex of experimenter, sex of experimental partner, sex typing (Bem Sex Role Inventory score), and level of past experience, on a computer interaction task involving a dyad. College students, drawn from a primarily white college population, after completing paper-and-pencil measures assessing computer experience, computer attitudes, and gender roles, participated in a computer task involving drawing up to ten prescribed geometric patterns on a computer screen. Research assistants recorded the number of correctly completed patterns and videotaped participant interaction through a one-way mirror. Males reported experiencing more computer involvement than females. For males, past computer experience and masculinity were correlated with more positive computer attitude scores. For females, only past computer experience related to more positive computer attitude scores. Analyses of the computer interaction variable indicated that participants asked male research assistants significantly more questions than female research assistants. Several interaction effects were also found.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abelson, H. (1982). Apple Logo. Peterborough, NH: BYTE/McGraw-Hill.
Arch, E. C., & Cummins, D. E. (1989). Structured and unstructured exposure to computers: Sex differences in attitude and use among college students. Sex Roles, 20, 245–253.
Bem, S. L. (1977). On the utility of alternative procedures for assessing psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 196–205.
Braun, C. M., Goupil, T., Giroux, J., & Chagnon, Y. (1986). Adolescents and microcomputers: Sex differences, proxemics, task and stimulus variables. The Journal of Psychology, 120, 529–542.
Burger, C. F. (1982). Attainment of skill in using science processes: Instrumentation, methodology, and analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19, 249–260.
Campbell, N. (1989). Computer anxiety of rural middle and secondary school students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5, 213–220.
Char, C., Hawkins, J., Wooten, J., Sheingold, K., & Roberts, T. (1983). The voyage of the Mimi: Classroom case studies of software, video, and print materials (Report to the U.S. Department of Education). New York: Bank Street College of Education.
Clarke, V., & Chambers, S. (1989). Gender based factors in computing enrollments and achievement: Evidence from a study of tertiary students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5, 409–429.
Collis, B. (1985). Sex-related differences in attitudes toward computers: Implications for counselors. The School Counsel, 33, 120–130.
Dambrot, F. H., Watkins-Malek, M. A., Silling, S. M., Marshall, R. S., & Garver, J. A. (1985). Correlates of sex differences in attitudes toward and involvement with computers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 27, 71–86.
Edwards, P. (1990). The army and the microworld: Computers & the politics of gender identity. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 16, 102–127.
Fetler, M. (1985). Sex differences on the California statewide assessment of computer literacy. Sex Roles, 13, 181–191.
Hawkins, J. (1985). Computers and girls: Rethinking the issues. Sex Roles, 13, 165–180.
Hess, R., & Miura, I. (1985). Gender differences in enrollment in computer camps and classes. Sex Roles, 13, 193–203.
Huston, A. C. (1985). The development of sex typing: Themes from recent research. Developmental Review, 5, 1–17.
Kohlberg, L. (1966). A cognitive-developmental analysis of children's sex-role concepts and attitudes. In E. Maccoby (Ed.), The development of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Krendl, K., Broihier, M., & Fleetwood, C. (1989). Children and computers: Do sex-related differences persist? Journal of Communication, 39, 85–93.
Levin, T., & Gordon, C. (1989). Effect of gender and computer experience on attitudes toward computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5, 69–88.
Linn, M. C. (1985). Gender equity in computer learning environments. Computers and the Social Sciences, 1, 19–27.
Lockheed, M., Neilson, A., & Stone, M. (1985). Determinants of microcomputer literacy in high school students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1, 81–95.
Loyd, B., & Gressard, C. (1984). The effects of sex, age, and computer experience. AEDS Journal, 18, 67–77.
Mandinach, E. B., & Corno, L. (1985). Cognitive engagement variations among students of different ability level and sex in a computer problem solving game. Sex Roles, 13, 241–250.
McClurg, P. A., & Chaille, C. (1987). Computer games: Environments for developing spatial cognition? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 3, 95–111.
Mischel, W. (1970). Sex-typing and socialization. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichaels manual of child psychology (Vol. 2). New York: John Wiley.
Miura, I. T. (1987). The relationship of computer self-efficacy expectations to computer interest and course enrollment in college. Sex Roles, 16, 303–311.
Nickell, G. S., Schmidt, C. R., & Pinto, J. N. (1987, April). Gender and sex role preferences in computer attitudes and experience. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwestern Psychological Association, New Orleans, LA.
Nye, E. (1991). Computers and gender: Noticing what perpetuates inequality. English Journal, 80, 94–95.
Ogletree, S. M., & Williams, S. W. (1990). Sex and sex-typing effects on computer attitudes and aptitude. Sex Roles, 23, 703–712.
Reece, C. (1986, November). Gender and microcomputers: Implications for the school curriculum. Paper presented at the meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Memphis, TN. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED 281-514).
Serbin, L. A., & Sprafkin, C. (1986). The salience of gender and the process of sex typing in three-to-seven-year-old children. Child Development, 57, 1188–1199.
Sheingold, K., Kane, J. H., & Endreweit, M. E. (1983). Microcomputer use in schools: Developing a research agenda. Harvard Education Review, 53, 412–432.
Underwood, G., McCaffrey, M., & Underwood, J. (1990). Gender differences in a cooperative computer-based language task. Educational Research, 32, 44–49.
Ware, M. C., & Stuck, M. F. (1985). Sex-role messages vis-a-vis microcomputer use: A look at the pictures. Sex Roles, 13, 205–214.
Wilder, G., Mackie, D., & Cooper, J. (1985). Gender and computers: Two surveys of computer-related attitudes. Sex Roles, 13, 215–229.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Williams, S.W., Ogletree, S.M., Woodburn, W. et al. Gender roles, computer attitudes, and dyadic computer interaction performance in college students. Sex Roles 29, 515–525 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289325
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289325