Abstract
Students from the 5th, 8th, and 11th grades (55 male and 53 female) were asked to describe their ideal self-image. Analyses revealed a number of gender and developmental differences not found with other self-image measures. A greater proportion of females than males mentioned two of the categories related to family life: marriage and improving relations with their family of origin. Mentions of categories surrounding athletics were more prevalent among males. Grade level differences in the content of the ideal self-image reflected cognitive-developmental shifts away from concrete descriptors, changes in physical maturity and the heightened importance of peer relationships around adolescence, and the approach of developmental milestones. Fewer students mentioned physical appearance at higher grade levels. Mentions of athletic abilities and social acceptance peaked at the 8th grade, while mentions of college, marriage, and having children rose at higher grade levels. Differences in the content areas mentioned by average versus advanced track students appeared to reflect differences in both cognitive-developmental level and socialization experiences.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bybee, J. A. (1989). The role of the ideal self-image and guilt in socioemotional adjustment. Manuscript submitted for publication, Yale University.
Bybee, J. A., & Zigler, E. (In press). The self-image and guilt: A further test of the cognitive-developmental formulation. Journal of Personality.
Bybee, J., Luthar, S., & Zigler, E. (1989). An investigation of the moral and fantasy variants of the ideal self-image. Manuscript submitted for publication, Yale University.
Damon, W., & Hart, D. (1982). The development of self-understanding from infancy through adolescence. Child Development, 53 841–864.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Glick, M., & Zigler, E. (1985). Self-image: A cognitive-developmental approach. In R. Leahy (Ed.), The development of the self (pp. 1–53). New York: Academic Press.
Harter, S. (1985). Processes underlying the construction, maintenance, and enhancement of the self-concept in children. In J. Suls and A. Greenwald (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on the self. (Vol. 3.) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Katz, P., & Zigler, E. (1967). Self-image disparity: A developmental approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5 186–195.
Katz, P., Zigler, E., & Zalk, S. (1975). Children's self-image disparity: The effects of age, maladjustment, and action-thought orientation. Developmental Psychology, 11 546–550.
Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1975). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41 954–969.
McGuire, W. J., & McGuire, C. V. (1982). Significant others in the self-space: Sex differences and developmental trends in the social self. In J. Suls (Ed.), Social psychological perspectives on the self. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
McGuire, W. J., & Padawer-Singer, A. (1976). Trait salience in the spontaneous self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33 743–754.
Phillips, D., & Zigler, E. (1980). Children's self-image disparity: Effects of age, socioeconomic status, ethnicity, and gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39 689–700.
Spence, J. T., & Sawin, L. L. (1985). Images of masculinity and femininity: A reconceptualization. In V. E. O'Leary, R. K. Unger, & B. S. Wallston (Eds.), Women, gender, and social psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Striegel-Moore, R., Silberstein, L., & Rodin, J. (1986). Toward an understanding of risk factors for bulimia. American Psychologist, 41 246–263.
Wylie, R. C. (1979). The self-concept: Vol. 2. Theory and research on selected topics. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Zigler, E., & Glick, M. (1986). A developmental approach to adult psychopathology. New York: Wiley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The authors wish to extend their appreciation to Timothy DiCintio and Scott Weissman for their assistance in content coding.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bybee, J., Glick, M. & Zigler, E. Differences across gender, grade level, and academic track in the content of the ideal self-image. Sex Roles 22, 349–358 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288338
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288338