Abstract
Two studies were done to see whether self-descriptions on the Bem Sex Role Inventory (BSRI) are stable across various social roles, or whether adopting familiar gender-segregated social roles produces more traditionally sex-typed BSRI self-descriptions. Parents of 41 infants completed the BSRI under standard instructions, and thinking of themselves in their parental roles. And 76 undergraduates completed it under standard instructions, and thinking of themselves as students, and as boyfriends or girlfriends. Both scales of the BSRI changed significantly across roles for both genders in each study. Traditionally sex-typed self-descriptions did not increase in the parent roles or the boyfriend role. The student and boy- or girlfriend roles produced the same changes in men and women. Results appear inconsistent with Bem's interpretation of the BSRI in terms of masculinity, femininity, and sex roles, and support Spence and Helmreich's emphasis on instrumentality and expressiveness.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abrahams, B., Feldman, S., & Nash, S. Sex role self-concept and sex role attitudes: Enduring personality characteristics or adaptations to changing life situations? Developmental Psychology, 1978, 14, 393–400.
Ashmore, R. D., & DelBoca, F. K. Sex stereotypes and implicit personality theory: Toward a cognitive-social psychological conceptualization. Sex Roles, 1979, 5, 219–248.
Bem, S. L. The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974, 42, 155–162.
Bem, S. L. Sex-role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 31, 634–643.
Bem, S. L. On the utility of alternative procedures for assessing psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1977, 45, 196–205.
Bem, S. L. Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 1981 88, 354–364.
Bem, S. L., & Lenney, E. Sex-typing and the avoidance of cross-sex behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976, 33, 48–54.
Bem, S. L., Martyna, W., & Watson, C. Sex typing and androgyny: Further explorations of the expressive domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976, 34, 1016–1023.
Berzins, J., Welling, M., & Wetter, R. A new measure of psychological androgyny based on the Personality Research Form. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1978, 46, 126–138.
Carey, W. B., & McDevitt, S. C. Revision of the Infant Temperament Questionnaire. Pediatrics, 1978, 61, 735–739.
Clifton A., McGrath, D., & Wick, B. Stereotypes of women: A single category? Sex Roles, 1976, 2, 135–148.
Constantinople, A. Masculinity-femininity: An exception to a famous dictum? Psychological Bulletin, 1973 80, 389–407.
Deaux, K. From individual differences to social categories: Analysis of a decade's research on gender. American Psychologist, 1984, 39, 105–116.
Gaudreau, P. Factor-analysis of the Bem Sex Role Inventory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1977, 45, 299–302.
Kaplan, A. G., & Bean, J. P. Beyond sex-role stereotypes. Boston: Little-Brown & Co, 1976.
Lamb, M. E. Interactions between 8-month-old children and their fathers and mothers. In N. Lamb (Ed.), The role of the father in child development. New York: Wiley, 1976.
Locksley, A., & Colten, M. Psychological androgyny: A case of mistaken identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979, 37, 1017–1031.
Myers, A. M., & Gonda, G. Empirical validation of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1982, 43, 304–318. (a)
Myers, A. M., & Gonda, G. Utility of the masculinity-femininity construct: Comparison of traditional and androgyny approaches. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1982, 43, 514–523. (b)
Myers, A., & Sugar, J. A critical analysis of scoring the BSRI: Implications for conceptualization. JSAS Catalogue of Selected Documents in Psychology, 1979, 9, 24 (Ms. No. 1833).
Pedhuzar, E., & Tetenbaum, T. Bem Sex Role Inventory: A theoretical and methodological critique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979, 37, 996–1016.
Pleck, J. H. The psychology of sex-roles: Traditional and new views. In L. A. Carter & A. F. Scott (Eds.), Women and men: Changing roles, relationships, and perceptions. New York: Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies, 1976.
Spence, J. T. Comments on Baumrind's “Are androgynous individuals more effective persons and parents?” Child Development, 1982, 53, 76–80.
Spence, J., & Helmreich, R. Masculinity and femininity. Austin, Tex.: University of Texas Press, 1978.
Spence, J., & Helmreich, R. Masculine instrumentality and feminine expressiveness: Their relationships with sex role attitudes and behavior. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1980, 5, 147–163.
Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. T. Androgyny versus gender schema: A comment on Bem's gender schema theory. Psychological Review, 1981, 88, 365–368.
Stark-Adamec, C., Graham, M., & Pyke, S. Androgyny and mental health: The need for a critical evaluation of the theoretical equation. International Journal of Women's Studies, 1980, 3, 490–507.
Weston, M. J. The effects of gender, sex role type and temperament on the play behavior of parents and infants. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York University, 1982.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
An earlier version of some of this work was presented at the Eastern Psychological Association Convention, May 1984. We would like to thank Wayne Winborne, Barbara Fliegelmann, Jodie Pincus and Mark Sternberg for their help in collecting and analyzing data; and Diane Ruble and an anonymous reviewer for their extremely thoughtful, detailed and helpful comments on earlier versions of this manuscript. Of course, the views expressed in this paper are the authors' responsibility alone.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Uleman, J.S., Weston, M. Does the BSRI inventory sex roles?. Sex Roles 15, 43–62 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287531
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287531