Abstract
The current study was designed to measure the effects of degree of touch on initial contact on interpersonal judgment. Subjects (60 male and 60 female) reporting for an experiment on interpersonal judgment were met by the experimenter and another subject. The second subject was in fact a confederate. As the “subjects” were introduced, the confederate responded in one of three ways: a nod of the head (no touch); a firm handshake; or a firm handshake accompanied by a squeeze on the subject's right upper arm by the confederate's left hand. Half of the subjects met a male and half met a female confederate. Subjects were then placed in separate cubicles and asked to complete the Byrne interpersonal judgment questionnaire about the person they had just briefly met. This scale has six items (intelligence, knowledge of current events, morality, personal feelings, participation in experiments, and adjustment) for same-sex pairs and four additional items for opposite-sex pairs (dating, marriage, physical and sexual attraction). The results indicated that the variations in the type of initial contact between subject and confederate resulted in several significantly different interpersonal judgments. Of particular interest was the finding that a male confederate greeting a female subject was viewed as a more acceptable marriage partner the more touch was invoved in the initial contact. A female confederate greeting a male subject was viewed as a less acceptable marriage partner the more touch that was involved. The degree of touch also affected judgments of knowledge of current events, adjustment, dating, and physical attraction. Typically, the more touch, the higher the rating for the male confederate, whereas the female confederate was typically rated highest on the nod or handshake plus the additional touch to the arm, and least when she simply shook hands. The relevance of these findings to first impressions and role stereotyping are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bardeen, J. P. Interpersonal perception through the tactile, verbal, and visual modes. Paper presented at International Communication Association Convention, Phoenix, 1971.
Byrne, D., London, O., & Reeves, K. The effects of physical attractiveness, sex and attitude similarity on interpersonal attractions. Journal of Personality, 1968, 36, 259–271.
Byrne, D. The attraction paradigm, New York: Academic Press, 1971.
Caly, V.S. The effect of culture on mother-child tactile communication. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Columbia University, 1966.
Dion, K., Berchied, E., & Walster, E. What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 24, 285–90.
Frank, L. K. Tactile communication, Genetic Psychology Monographs, 1957, 56, 209–55.
Harlow, H. F. Learning to love. San Francisco: Albion, 1971.
Henley, N. M. The politics of touch. In Radical Psychology, P. Brown, Ed., New York: Harper & Row, 1973, 421–33.
Jourard, S. M. An exploratory study of body-accessibility. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1966, 5, 221–31.
Montague, M. F. A. Touching: The human significance of the skin. New York: Columbia University Press, 1971.
Myers, J. L. Fundamentals of experimental design. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1966.
Silverthorne, C. P., Noreen, C., Hunt, T., & Rota, L. The effects of tactile stimulation and visual experience. Journal of Social Psychology, 1972, 88, 153–154.
Stroebe, W., Insko, C. A., Thompson, V. D., & Layton, B. D. Effects of physical attractiveness, attitude similarity and sex on various aspects of interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971, 18, 79–91.
Walster, E., Aronson, E., Abrahams, D., & Rottman, L. Importance of physical attractiveness in dating behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966, 4, 508–516.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This study was supported in part by a faculty research grant from the University of San Francisco.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Silverthorne, C., Micklewright, J., O'Donnell, M. et al. Attribution of personal characteristics as a function of the degree of touch on initial contact and sex. Sex Roles 2, 185–193 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287251
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287251