Abstract
An experiment was conducted to determine the relationship between sex-role attitudes, affiliation, and dominance and nonverbal communication styles in men and women in same- and opposite-sex dyads. Women were found to elicit more warmth and men more anxiety from their partners. Evidence was found for a possible monitoring mechanism through which women adjust their nonverbal communications to fit the male in the interaction. Liberalism in sex-role attitudes was found to correlate with nonverbal warmth in men. The nonverbal presentations of men and women in the microprocesses of dyadic interaction were found to relate significantly to the macrostructure of societal sex roles.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Argyle, M., & Dean, J., Eye contact, distance and affiliation, Sociometry, 1965, 28, 289–304.
Argyle, M., & Ingham, R., Gaze, mutual gaze, and proximity, Semiotica, 1972, 6, 32–49.
Aries, E., Interaction patterns and themes of male, female and mixed groups. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association meeting, New Orleans, September, 1974.
Beekman, S., Sex differences in nonverbal behavior. Paper submitted for publication, based on an unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, 1974.
Birdwhistell, R., Kinesics and context, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, 1970.
Bugental, D. E., Love, L. R., & Gianetto, R. M., Perfidious feminine faces. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971, 17, 314–318.
Duncan, S., Nonverbal communication. Psychological Bulletin, 1969, 72, 118–137.
Exline, R. V., Visual interaction: the glances of power and preference. In J. Cole (Ed.) Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, 1972, pp. 163–206.
Exline, R. V., Gray, D., & Schuette, D., Visual behavior in a dyad as affected by interview content and sex of respondent. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1965, 1, 201–209.
Firestone, S., The dialectic of sex, Bantam Books, New York, 1970.
Henley, N. M., The politics of touch. In P. Brown (Ed.), Radical psychology, Harper and Row, New York, 1973, pp. 421–433.
Lakoff, R., Language and woman's place. Language and Society, 1973, 2, 45–79.
Little, B. R., Psychospecialization functions of differential interests in persons and things. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 1968, 21, 113.
Mehrabian, A., Verbal and nonverbal interaction of strangers in a waiting situation. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 1971, 5, 127–138.
Rosenfeld, H. M., Approval-seeking and approval-inducing functions of verbal and nonverbal responses in the dyad. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966, 4, 497–505.
Rosenthal, R., Experimental effects in behavioral research. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, 1966.
Rosenthal, R., Covert communication in the psychological experiment. Psychological Bulletin, 1967, 67, 356–367.
Rosenthal, R., Estimating effective reliabilities in studies employing judges' ratings. Harvard University, 1970 (mimeo).
Rosenthal, R., The use of film in assessing sensitivity to nonverbal communication — the PONS test. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association meeting, Montreal, August 1973.
Sachs, J., Lieberman, P., & Erickson, D., Anatomical and cultural determinants of male and female speech. In R. Shuy and R. W. Fasold (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Current Trends and Prospects, Georgetown University Monograph Series on Languages and Linguistics, 1973.
Scheflen, A., Quasi-courtship behavior in psychotherapy. Psychiatry, 1965, 28, 245–257.
Thorne, B., & Henley, N., Sex differences in language, speech, and nonverbal communication: an annotated bibliography, 1974.
Warshay, D. W., Sex differences in language style. In C. Safilios-Rothschild (Ed.), Toward A Sociology of Women, Xerox College Publishing, Lexington, Mass., 1972, pp. 3–9.
Weitz, S., The effect of sex role attitudes on sex typing in socialization. Paper presented at Eastern Psychological Association meeting, Washington, D.C., May 1973.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by NSF Grant GS36814. The author wishes to express her special thanks to Harmon Hosch, Vivian Shayne, David Fineman, and Lee Braff for their help in the experiment and data analysis. An abbreviated version of this paper was presented at the meeting of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco, August 1975.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weitz, S. Sex differences in nonverbal communication. Sex Roles 2, 175–184 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287250
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287250