Abstract
Clay liners remain an important component of composite liners used in landfill construction. Because their hydraulic integrity is frequently lost due to desiccation cracking, either during construction or shortly thereafter. The present study was initiated to evaluate the effects of common soil additives including lime, cement, and sand on the shrinkage and hydraulic conductivity of compacted clay soils commonly used in clay liner construction. Three soils having predominant clay minerals of smectite, illite and kaolinite were amended with varying amounts of lime, cement or sand; compacted using the Harvard miniature compactor; and the volumetric shrinkage was measured on the compacted samples. Additional samples of each treated soil were compacted according to ASTM 698 and used for measurement of the hydraulic conductivity. The results show that the majority of shrinkage occurs when the samples were dried to 25 °C with little additional shrinkage at temperatures up to 105 °C. The amendments of either 4% lime or 40 to 50% sand resulted in reduced shrinkage and increased hydraulic conductivity. The addition of 3% cement reduced shrinkage by up to 50% and simultaneously reduced hydraulic conductivity by 2 orders of magnitude. Thus, amendment of clay soils having a high shrink-swell potential with Type I Portland cement has the greatest poetential for field application as an amendment to help maintain the integrity and improve the long term performance of compacted clay liners.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anderson, D. C., Artiola, J. F., Crawley, W. W., Shiver, L. R. and Unger, M.: 1984, ‘Weathering Effects On Exposed Soil Liners’, Proceedings Twelfth Annual Research Symposium. Land Disposal, Remedial Action, Incineration and Treatment of Hazardous Waste’ U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Boynton, S. S.: 1983, ‘An Investigation of Selected Factors Affecting the Hydraulic Conductivity of Compacted Clay’, M. S. Thesis. Civil Engineering Department, University of Texas, Austin, Texas, 79 p.
Cibor, J. M., Meehdiratta, G. R. and Martin, J. D.: 1989, ‘Improved Methodology for Constructing Soil Liners Using Highly Plastic Clay’, Proceedings of The 10th National Conference, Superfund 89', November 27–29, 1989, Washington, D. C., pp. 512–518.
Daniel, D. E.: 1984, J. of Geotechn. Eng. ASCE 110(2), 285.
Fuller, A. O.: 1961, J. of Sedimentary Petrology 31, 256.
Gee, G. W. and Bauder, J. W.: 1986, ‘Particle Size Analysis’, Chapter 15. in Kluke, A. (ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods, Second Edition. Agronomy 9, 383. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.
George, K. P.: 1968a, Highway Research Record 225, 59.
George, K. P.: 1968b, Highway Research Record 225, 42.
George, K. P.: 1970, Crack Control in Cement-Treated Bases. Final Report. The University of Mississippi School of Engineering, Engineering Experiment Station, University of Mississippi.
Kezdi, A.: 1979, Stabilized Earth Roads, Development in Geotechnical Engineering, 19, Elsevier Scientific Publication, Co., New York, N.Y., pp. 108–177.
Omidi, G. H.: 1993, ‘Desiccation Shrinkage and Cracking in Soil Liner’, Ph.D. Dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
Picornell, M. and Idriss, M. Z.: 1989, ‘Design of Clay Liners to Minimize Shrinkage Cracking’, Presented at 3rd International Conference on New Frontiers for Hazardous Waste Management, September 11, 1989, Pittsburg, PA.
Tiles, I.: 1951, ‘Shrinkage and Strength of Compacted Sand-Clay Mixtures’, M. S. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston Mass.
Wilson, S. D.: 1950, Engineering News-Record, Nov. 2, 1950. pp. 34–36.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Omidi, G.H., Prasad, T.V., Thomas, J.C. et al. The influence of amendments on the volumetric shrinkage and integrity of compacted clay soils used in landfill liners. Water Air Soil Pollut 86, 263–274 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00279161
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00279161