Summary
Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] producers in the Great Plains region usually employ either a seasonal soil water balance approach, or a growth stage sensitivity approach, relative to scheduling sprinkler irrigation events. We conducted an empirical evaluation of the response of six soybean cultivars to three irrigation strategies. One was an irrigation scheduling (IS) system based solely on maintaining a soil water content in the root zone between 50% and 80% of the total plant available soil water capacity. The other two strategies involved the same depletion criterion for triggering irrigation events, except that the first irrigation was intentionally delayed until the flowering (FL) stage, or the mid-pod elongation (PD) stage. The total water amount applied during each season was approximately similar for the IS, FL, and PD strategies. Thus, the primary difference among the three strategies was the time frame during which irrigation events were scheduled. In the 1983 test, the yields attained in the IS, FL, and PD treatments were not significantly different from each other (i.e. 4.08, 4.08, and 4.04 Mg/ha, respectively), and were nearly double the yield obtained in the nonirrigated (NI) check treatment (2.29 Mg/ha). In the 1984 test, the yields of the IS, FL, and PD treatments were again not significantly different (2.02, 2.05, and 2.22 Mg/ha, respectively). However, the 1984 yield response to irrigation was also not significant relative to the NI check (1.90 Mg/ha), primarily because of low plant populations and a shorter growing season. Thus, this two-year experiment indicated that delaying irrigation until the FL or the PD stages of soybean reproductive development could be just as effective (i.e. 1983 data), or at least no more ineffective (i.e. 1984 data), in enhancing soybean yield compared to the IS strategy (Fig. 1). The soil water balance and soybean growth stage sensitivity approaches, when combined, could thus constitute an effective strategy of soybean sprinkler irrigation management in the Great Plains region.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Brady RA, Stone LR, Nickell CD, Powers WL (1974) Water conservation through proper timing of soybean irrigation. J Soil Water Conserv 29:266
Cochran WG, Cox GM (1957) Experimental design, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
Dorn TW, Eisenhauer DE, Fischbach PE (1984) Irrigation scheduling using tensiometers and evapotranspiration on deep sandy soils. University of Nebraska Coop Ext Service, EC 84–724
Eisenhauer DE, Fischbach PE, Trimmer WL, Krohn RA (1979) Irrigation scheduling using soil moisture blocks in deep soil. University of Nebraska Coop Ext Service. EC 79–723
Elmore RW, Eisenhauer DE, Specht JE, Williams JH (1988) Soybean response to limited-capacity sprinkler irrigation systems. J Prod Agric 1:196
Fehr WR, Caviness CE (1980) Stages of soybean development. Iowa Agric Exp Stn SR-80
Hanks RJ, Gardner HR, Florian FL (1969) Plant growth — evapotranspiration relations for several crops in the central great plains. Agron J 61:30
Hiler EA, Howell TA, Lewis RB, Boos RP (1974) Irrigation timing by the stress day index method. Trans Am Soc Agric Eng 17:393
Jensen ME, Wright JL, Pratt BJ (1971) Estimating soil water depletion from climate, crop and soil data. Trans Am Soc Agric Eng 14:954
Jones JW, Smajstrla AG (1980) Application of modeling to irrigation management of soybeans. In: Corbin FT (ed) Proceedings of the Second World Soybean Research Conference, 26–29 March 1979, Raleigh, NC. Westview Press, Boulder, p 571
Kadhem FA, Specht JE, Williams JH (1985a) Soybean irrigation serially time during stages R1 to R6. I. Agronomic responses. Agron J 77:291
Kadhem FA, Specht JE, Wiliams JH (1985b) Soybean irrigation serially timed during stages R1 to R6. II. Yield component responses. Agron J 77:299
Korte LL, Specht JE, Williams JH, Sorenson RC (1983b) Irrigation of soybean genotypes during reproductive ontogeny. II. Yield component responses. Crop Sci 23:528
Korte LL, Williams JH, Specht JE, Sorenson RC (1983a) Irrigation of soybean genotypes during reproductive ontogeny. I. Agronomic responses. Crop Sci 23:521
Martin DL, Watts DG, Gilley JR (1984) Model and production function for irrigation management. J Irrig Drain Eng 110:149
Smaljstrla AG, Clark GA (1982) Water stress effects on water use and yield of soybeans. Soil and Crop Science Society of Florida, Proceedings 41:178
Specht JE, Williams JH (1983) Soybean cultivar response to irrigation timing. In: Wilkinson D (ed) Proceedings of the Thirteenth Soybean Seed Research Conference, 6–7 December 1983, Chicago, IL. American Seed Trade Association, Washington, D.C., p 40
Specht JE, Williams JH, Weidenbenner CJ (1986) Differential responses of soybean genotypes to a seasonal soil water gradient. Crop Sci 26:922
Tscheschke P, Gilley JR, Thompson TL, Fischbach PE (1978) IRRIGATE — A scheduling model. Agric Eng 59:45
Van Doren Jr DM, Reicosky DC (1987) Tillage and irrigation. In: Wilcox JR (ed), Soybeans: improvement, production, and uses, 2nd edn. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, p 391
Yonts CD, Klocke NL (1985) Irrigation scheduling using crop water use data. University of Nebraska Coop Ext Service G85-753
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Contribution of the Department of Agronomy and Department of Agricultural Engineering, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583. Published as Paper no. 8461, Journal Series, Nebraska Agric. Exp. Stn. Project no. 12-091. Research partially funded by grants received from the Nebraska Soybean Development, Utilization, and Marketing Board
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Specht, J.E., Elmore, R.W., Eisenhauer, D.E. et al. Growth stage scheduling criteria for sprinkler-irrigated soybeans. Irrig Sci 10, 99–111 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00265687
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00265687