Abstract
608 patients admitted to a general Intensive Care Unit (ICU) over a 30 month period were analyzed according to the Apache II Severity of Disease Classification System on day one of admission. Hospital outcome details were available on 583 patients in the series. The mean Apache II scores for survivors (396) and non-survivors (187) were 13 (SD 7) and 24 (SD 9), and their Risk of Death were 16 (SD 16) and 47 (SD 27) respectively (p(0.001 for both). The majority of deaths (75%: 141/187) in our series came from those with chronic ill health (55%: 103/187), of whom 37% (38/103) were in endstage disease, and those with “old” trauma (18%: 34/187) often with incipient sepsis transferred from other hospitals after a mean delay of 9 days. Our higher than predicted mortality (mortality ratio 1.2) in comparison with centres in the United States of America (US) may be partly explained by the high proportion of our population from these unfavourable groups, by our use of the best Glasgow Coma Scale in the first 24 h following admission, and the major differences between our patient population and that of the US upon which the Apache II was based. The presence of these large unfavourable groups indicates a change in our admission policy is warranted.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Jacobs S, Chang RWS, Lee B (1987) One year's experience with the Apache II severity of disease classification system in a general Intensive Care Unit. Anaesthesia 42:738
Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE (1985) Apache II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 13:818
Chang RWS, Jacobs S, Lee B (1986) Use of Apache II severity of disease classification system to identify intensive care patients who would not benefit from total parenteral nutrition. Lancet I:1483
Chang RWS, Jacobs S, Lee B, Pace N (1988) Predicting deaths among ICU patients. Crit Care Med 16:34
Civetta JM (1977) Selection of patients for intensive care. In: Ledingham I McA (ed) Recent advances in intensive therapy. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, p 9
Shoemaker WC, Pierchala C, Chang PC, State D (1977) Use of frequency distribution of cardio-respiratory variables to predict outcome and severity of illness in post-operative patients. Crit Care Med 5:82
Baker SP, O'Neill B, Haddon W, Long WB (1974) The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. Trauma 14:187
Lemeshow S, Teres D, Pastides H, Avrunin JS, Steingrub JS (1985) A method for predicting survival and mortality of ICU patients using objective derived weights. Crit Care Med 13:519
Bland RD, Shoemaker WC (1985) Probability of survival as a prognostic and severity of illness score in critically ill surgical patients. Crit Care Med 13:91
Teres T, Lemeshow S, Avrunin JS, Pastides H (1987) Validation of the mortality prediction model for ICU patients. Crit Care Med 15:208
Le Gall J, Loirat P, Alperovitch A, Glaser P, Granthil C, Mathieu D, Mercier P, Thomas R, Villers D (1984) A simplified acute physiological score for ICU patients. Crit Care Med 12:975
National Institute of Health Consensus Development Conference (1983) Critical care medicine. JAMA 250:798
Bion JF, Edlin SA, Ramsay G, McCabe S, Ledingham Im (1985) Validation of a prognostic score in critically ill patients undergoing transport. Br Med J 291:432
Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE (1985) Prognosis in acute organ-system failure. Ann Surg 202:685
Garden OJ, Motyl H, Gilmour WH, Utley RJ, Carter DC (1985) Prediction of outcome following acute variceal haemorrhage. Br J Surg 72:91
Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE (1986) An evaluation of outcome from intensive care in major medical centres. Ann Intern Med 104:410
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jacobs, S., Chang, R.W.S. & Lee, B. Audit of intensive care: a 30 month experience using the Apache II severity of disease classification system. Intensive Care Med 14, 567–574 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00263531
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00263531