Summary
In a neurophysiological study within the auditory centers of the mediocaudal telencephalon of the starling, 601 neurons were tested for auditory responses. 369 of these units responded to pure tones, noise bands, amplitude modulations (AM), or species-specific sounds. Of all the auditory neurons, 16.8% did not respond to pure tones but only to more complex stimuli (tone-unresponsive-, TU-units). The remaining auditory units were classified as tone-responsive (TR-units). In 44.3% of TR-units (i.e. 36.9% of all auditory units) differing responses to tones versus more complex stimuli were observed. Responses as they occur in TU-units and in the differing responses of TR-units can be explained by neuronal extraction of features in the time (108 out of 198 neurons) and in the spectral domain (82 out of 198 neurons). Responses to species-specific sounds usually can be explained in terms of extraction of these features. Among neurons sensitive to temporal features, exclusive responses to a narrow range of AM frequencies were observed. In those TU-units that represent spectral features some restrict their responses to noise bands with distinct bandwidths centered around a specific midfrequency. These units reject both wider and narrower noise bands. A tonotopic arrangement of auditory units is found in field L, the surrounding neostriatum (NCM), and the Hyperstriatum ventrale (HV). Isofrequency lines run as a continuum through NCM, field L, and the caudal part of HV. TU-units are integrated into the tonotopic gradient according to the midfrequency of effective stimuli (e.g. noise bands or AM). The anatomical position of auditory units is correlated to their response properties. Within one isofrequency contour an increase in response selectivity is seen from field L to the postsynaptic areas in the NCM and the HV. The results are discussed in terms of possible mechanisms of feature extraction in the avian auditory system.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bateson PPG, Horn G, McCabe BJ (1978) Imprinting and the incorporation of uracil in the chick brain: a radioautographic study. J Physiol (Lond) 275: 70P
Békésy G (1944) Über die mechanische Frequenzanalyse in der Schnecke verschiedener Tiere. Akust Zeitsch 9: 3
Bonke BA, Bonke D, Scheich H (1979a) Connectivity of the auditory forebrain nuclei in the guinea fowl (Numida meleagris). Cell Tiss Res 200: 101–121
Bonke D, Scheich H, Langner G (1979b) Responsiveness of units in the auditory neostriatum of the guinea fowl to species-specific calls and synthetic stimuli. I. Tonotopy and functional zones of field L. J Comp Physiol 132: 243–255
Bradley P, Horn G (1978) Afferent connections of hyperstriatum ventrale in the chick brain. J Physiol (Lond) 278: 46P
Clopton BM, Winfield JA, Flammino FJ (1974) Tonotopic organization: review and analysis. Brain Res 76: 1–20
Dooling RJ, Searcy MH (1981) Amplitude modulation thresholds for the parakeet (Melopsittacus undulatus). J Comp Physiol 143: 383–389
Fuzessery ZM, Feng AS (1982) Frequency selectivity in the anuran auditory midbrain: single unit responses to single and multiple tone stimulation. J Comp Physiol 146: 471–484
Hartby E (1969) The calls of the starling (Sturnus vulgaris). Dansk. Ornithol. Foren Tidsskr 62: 205–230
Horn G, McCabe BJ, Bateson PPG (1979) An autoradiographic study of the chick brain after imprinting. Brain Res 168: 361–373
Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1962) Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol (Lond) 160: 106–154
Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1968) Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. J Physiol (Lond) 195: 215–243
Karten HJ (1968) The ascending auditory pathway in the pigeon (Columbia liva) II. Telencephalic projections of the nucleus ovoidalis thalami. Brain Res 11: 134–153
Kelley DB, Nottebohm F (1979) Projections of a telencephalic auditory nucleus — field L — in the canary. J Comp Neurol 183: 455–470
Kirsch M, Coles RB, Leppelsack HJ (1980) Unit recordings from a new auditory area in the frontal neostriatum of the awake starling. Exp Brain Res 38: 375–380
Knudsen EI, Konishi M (1978) Space and frequency are represented separately in the auditory midbrain of the owl. J Neurophysiol 41: 870–884
Langner G (1983) Evidence for neuronal periodicity detection in the auditory system of the guinea fowl: implications for pitch analysis in the time domain. Exp Brain Res 52: 333–355
Langner G, Bonke D, Scheich H (1981) Neuronal discrimination of natural and synthetic vowels in field L of trained mynah birds. Exp Brain Res 43: 11–24
Leppelsack HJ (1974) Funktionelle Eigenschaften der Hörbahn im Feld L des Neostriatum caudale des Staren. J Comp Physiol 88: 271–320
Leppelsack HJ (1978) Unit responses to species-specific sounds in the auditory forebrain center of birds. Fed Proc 37: 2336–2341
Leppelsack HJ (1983) Analysis of song in the auditory pathway of songbirds. In: Ewert JP (ed) Advances in vertebrate neuroethology. Plenum Press, New York London, pp 783–800
Leppelsack HJ, Vogt M (1976) Responses of auditory neurons in the forebrain of a songbird to stimulation with species-specific sounds. J Comp Physiol 107: 263–274
Manley GA (1980) Response characteristics of auditory neurons in the cochlear ganglion of the starling. Acta XVII Congr Inter Ornithol Berlin: 697–700
McCasland J, Konishi M (1981) Interaction between auditory and motor activities in an avian song control nucleus. Proc Natl Acad Sci US 78: 7815–7819
Margoliash D (1983) Acoustic parameters underlying the responses of songspecific neurons in the white-crowned sparrow. J Neurosci 3: 1039–1057
Middlebrooks JC, Dykes RW, Merzenich MM (1980) Binaural response-specific bands in primary auditory cortex (AI) of the cat: topographical organization orthogonal to isofrequency contours. Brain Res 181: 31–48
Müller CM (1984) Die Rolle GABAerger Inhibition bei der auditorischen Nachrichtenverarbeitung im Vorderhirn des Haushuhnes. Verh Dtsch Zool Ges 77: 308
Müller SC, Scheich H (1985) Functional organization of the avian auditory field L. A comparative 2 DG study. J Comp Physiol 156: 1–12
Rose M (1914) Über die cytoarchitektonische Gliederung des Vorderhirnes der Vögel. J Psychol Neurol (Lpz) 21: 278–352
Ryals BM, Rubel EW (1982) Patterns of hair cell loss in the chick basilar papilla after intense auditory stimulation: frequency organization. Acta Otolaryngol 93: 205–210
Sachs L (1974) Angewandte Statistik. Planung und Auswertung, Methoden und Modelle. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Saini KD, Leppelsack HJ (1981) Cell types of the auditory caudiomedial neostriatum of the starling (Sturnus vulgaris). J Comp Neurol 198: 209–229
Scheich H (1983) Two columnar systems in the auditory neostriatum of the chick: evidence from 2-deoxyglucose. Exp Brain Res 51: 199–205
Scheich H, Bonke BA, Bonke D, Langner G (1979a) Functional organization of some auditory nuclei in the guinea fowl demonstrated by the 2-deoxyglucose technique. Cell Tiss Res 204: 17–27
Scheich H, Langner G, Bonke D (1979b) Responsiveness of units in the auditory neostriatum of the guinea fowl to species-specific calls and synthetic stimuli. II. Discrimination of iambus-like calls. J Comp Physiol 132: 257–276
Suga N (1977) Amplitude spectrum representation in the dopplershifted-CF processing area of the auditory cortex of the mustache bat. Science 196: 64–67
Sullivan III WE (1982) Possible neural mechanisms of target distance coding in auditory system of the echolocating bat Myotus lucifugus. J Neurophysiol 48: 1033–1047
Winter PA, Funkenstein HH (1973) The effect of species-specific vocalizations on the discharge of auditory cortical cells in the awake squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus). Exp Brain Res 18: 489–504
Wollberg Z, Newman JD (1972) Auditory cortex of squirrel monkey: response patterns of single cells to species specific vocalizations. Science 175: 212–214
Zaretzky MD, Konishi M (1976) Tonotopic organization in the avian telencephalon. Brain Res 111: 167–171
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Part of the program of the Sonderforschungsbereich 114 (BIONACH) funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Müller, C.M., Leppelsack, H.J. Feature extraction and tonotopic organization in the avian auditory forebrain. Exp Brain Res 59, 587–599 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00261351
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00261351