Summary
Load perturbations were applied to the arm of human subjects under conditions where both limb segments (upper arm and forearm) were free to move. The perturbations consisted of pulses of torque 50 ms in duration and of pseudo-random sequences of such pulses. They were applied to either the forearm or the upper arm. Under all conditions, the perturbations resulted in angular motion at the shoulder and elbow joints and evoked consistent responses in muscles acting about these joints (biceps, triceps, anterior and posterior deltoid). Activity in biceps and triceps was not related simply to angular motion at the elbow joint. For example, activation of biceps could be evoked during elbow flexion (by applying a torque perturbation at the shoulder) as well as during elbow extension (by applying a torque perturbation at the elbow). The effect of varying degrees of dynamic coupling between upper arm and forearm on EMG responses was investigated by applying torque perturbations to the upper arm over a wide range of elbow angles. When the forearm is extended, such a perturbation induces a greater amount of elbow flexion than when the forearm is in a flexed position. The results of these experiments showed that the larger was the amount of flexion of the forearm induced by the perturbation, the larger was the activation of biceps. The results are incompatible with the notion of a negative feedback of total muscle length as being responsible for the EMG activity following the load perturbations. It is suggested that the EMG responses can best be interpreted functionally in terms of parameters more global than muscle length. Among such global parameters, changes in net torque at a joint resulting from the perturbation gave the best correlation with the pattern of EMG activities observed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abbs J H, Gracco V L (1984) Control of complex motor gestures: orofacial muscle responses to load perturbations of lip during speech. J Neurophysiol 51: 705–723
Agarwal G C, Gottlieb G L (1977) Compliance of the human ankle joint. J Biomech Eng 99: 166–170
Andrews C J, Burke D, Lance J W (1972) The response to muscle stretch and shortening in Parkinsonian rigidity. Brain 95: 795–812
Bottermann B R, Hamm T M, Reinking R M, Stuart D G (1983) Localization of monosynaptic Ia excitatory post-synaptic potentials in the motor nucleus of the cat biceps femoris muscle. J Physiol (London) 338: 355–377
Davies W D T (1970) System identification for self-adaptive control. Wiley, London
Dempster W T (1965) Mechanisms of shoulder movement. Arch Phys Med Rehab 46: 49–70
Dufresne J R, Soechting J F, Terzuolo C A (1978) Electromyographic response to pseudo-random torque disturbances of human forearm position. Neuroscience 3: 1213–1226
Dufresne J R, Soechting J F, Terzuolo C A (1979) Reflex motor output to torque pulses in man: identification of short- and long-latency loops with individual feedback parameters. Neuroscience 4: 1493–1500
Dvir Z, Berme N (1978) The shoulder complex in elevation of the arm: a mechanism approach. J Biomech 11: 219–225
Eccles J C, Eccles R M, Shealy C N (1962) An investigation into the effect of degenerating primary afferent fibers on the monosynaptic innervation of motoneurons. J Neurophysiol 25: 544–558
Evans F G (1961) Biomechanical studies of the musculo-skeletal system. C C Thomas, Springfield, IL
Evarts E V (1973) Motor cortex reflexes associated with learned movement. Science 173: 501–503
Fick R (1911) Anatomie und Mechanik der Gelenke, Vol 3. Gustav Fischer, Jena
Gottlieb G L, Agarwal G C (1979) Response to sudden torques about ankle in man: myotatic reflex. J Neurophysiol 42: 91–106
Hollerbach J M, Flash T (1982) Dynamic interactions between limb segments during planar arm movement. Biol Cybern 44: 67–77
Houk J C (1977) Participation of reflex mechanisms and reaction time processes in the compensatory adjustments to mechanical disturbances. In: Desmedt J E (ed) Cerebral motor control in man: long loop mechanisms. Prog Clin Neurophysiol 4: 193–215
Houk J C, Rymer W Z (1981) Neural control of muscle length and tension. In: Brookart J M, Mountcastle V B (eds) Handbook of physiology, Sect 1, Vol 2, Part 1. Bethesda, Am Physiol Soc, pp 257–324
Hoy M G, Zernicke R F (1985) Modulation of limb dynamics in the swing phase of locomotion. J Biomech 18: 49–60
Johnson T L (1982) Feedback control. In: Brady M L et al. (eds) Robot motion: planning and control. MIT Press, Cambridge; pp 127–146
Kearney R E, Hunter I W (1983) System identification of human triceps surae stretch reflex dynamics. Exp Brain Res 51: 117–127
Kearney R E, Hunter I W (1984) System identification of human stretch reflex dynamics: tibialis anterior. Exp Brain Res 56: 154–161
Lacquaniti F, Soechting J F (1982) Coordination of arm and wrist motion during a reaching task. J Neurosci 2: 399–408
Lacquaniti F, Soechting J F (1984) Behavior of the stretch reflex in a multi-jointed limb. Brain Res 311: 161–166
Liddell E G T, Sherrington C (1924) Reflexes in response to stretch (myotatic reflexes). Proc R Soc B 96:212–242
Marsden C D, Merton P A, Morton H B (1976) Stretch reflex and servo action in a variety of human muscles. J Physiol (Lond) 259: 531–560
Matthews P B C (1981) Evolving views on the internal operation and functional role of the muscle spindle. J Physiol (Lond) 320: 1–30
Merton P A (1951) The silent period in a muscle of the human hand. J Physiol (Lond) 114: 183–198
Nashner L M (1976) Adapting reflexes controlling the human posture. Exp Brain Res 26: 59–72
Nashner L M (1977) Fixed patterns of rapid postural responses among muscles during stance. Exp Brain Res 30: 13–24
Nashner L M (1981) Analysis of stance posture in humans. In: Towe A L, Luschei E S (eds) Handbook of behavioral neurobiology, Vol 5. Plenum, New York p 527–565
Nichols T R, Houk J C (1976) Improvement of linearity and regulation of stiffness that results from actions of stretch reflex. J Neurophysiol 39: 119–142
O'Leary D P, Honrubia V (1975) On-line identification of sensory systems using pseudorandom binary noise inputs. Biophys J 15: 505–532
Paul R P (1981) Robot manipulators: mathematics, programming, and control. MIT Press, Cambridge
Philips C G (1969) Motor apparatus of the baboon's hand. Proc R Soc London B 173: 141–174
Poppele R E, Kennedy W R, Quick D C (1979) A determination of static mechanical properties of intrafusal muscle in isolated cat muscle spindles. Neuroscience 4: 401–411
Richmond F J R, Mac Gillis D R R, Scott D A (1985) Muscle fiber compartmentalization in cat splenius muscles. J Neurophysiol 53: 868–885
Samojloff A, Kisseleff M (1927) Die Verkürzungs- und Verlängerungsreaktionen des Knie-Extensors der decerebrierten Katze. Plügers Arch 218: 267–284
Sherrington C S (1909) On plastic tonus and proprioceptive reflexes. Q J Exp Physiol 2: 109–156
Soechting J F (1984) Effect of target size on spatial and temporal characteristics of a pointing movement in man. Exp Brain Res 54: 121–132
Soechting J F, Dufresene J R, Lacquaniti F (1981) Time-varying properties of myotatic response in man during some simple motor tasks. J Neurophysiol 46: 1226–1243
Soechting J F, Lacquaniti F (1981) Invariant characteristics of a pointing movement in man. J Neurosci 1: 710–720
Soechting J F, Lacquaniti F (1983) Modification of trajectory of a pointing movement in response to a change in target location. J Neurophysiol 49: 548–564
Stein R B (1982) What muscle variable(s) does the nervous system control in limb movements? Behav Brain Sci 5: 535–540
Terzuolo C, Soechting J F, Dufresne J R (1981) Operational characteristics of reflex response to changes in muscle length during different motor tasks and their functional utility. In: Pompeiano O, Ajmone Marsan C (eds) Brain mechanisms and perceptual awareness. New York, Raven Press pp 183–210
Wand P, Prochazka A, Sontag K.-H (1980) Neuromuscular responses to gait perturbations in freely moving cats. Exp Brain Res 38: 109–114
Westphal C (1880) Ueber eine Art paradoxer Muskel-Kontraktion. Arch. Psychiat Nervenkrankh 10: 243–248
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lacquaniti, F., Soechting, J.F. EMG responses to load perturbations of the upper limb: effect of dynamic coupling between shoulder and elbow motion. Exp Brain Res 61, 482–496 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00237573
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00237573