Abstract
In this paper, we present a method for assessing the exactness of sensing and setting the positions of joints and limbs, using a measure we call target resolution. Target resolution, derived from information theory but ultimately based on variance, estimates the fewest number of discrete, equally spaced targets required within a range to provide the maximum possible information transfer from any target set. We argue that target resolution provides better insight into the exactness of position sense than does the usual measure of accuracy based on mean or constant error. Studies have shown that measures of mean error in setting or indicating positions of joints or limbs exhibit lability; they drift and show considerable sensitivity to factors such as previous positions of the limb and learning. We derive the equation for calculating target resolution and give example resolutions for several joints we have tested. Target resolution often gives a quite different impression of proprioceptive exactness than do measures of accuracy based on mean error.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Braida LD, Durlach NI (1972) Intensity perception. II. Resolution in one-interval paradigms. J Acoust Soc Am 51:372–383
Clark FJ (1995) Assessing accuracy of positioning joints and limbs. In: Ferrell WR, Proske U (ed) Neural control of movement. Plenum, New York, pp 67–71
Craske B, Cranshaw M (1974) Differential errors of kinesthesis produced by previous limb positions. J Mot Behav 6:273–278
Durlach NI, Braida LD (1969) Intensity perception. I. Preliminary theory of intensity resolution. J Acoust Soc Am 46:372–383
Garner WR (1962) Uncertainty and structure as psychological concepts. Wiley, New York
Garner WR, Hake HW (1951) The amount of information in absolute judgements. Psychol Rev 58:446–459
Hollingworth HL (1910) The central tendency of judgement. J Philos Psychol Sci Methods 7:461–469
Houtsma AJM (1983) Estimation of mutual information from limited experimental data. J Acoust Soc Am 74:1626–1629
Howard IP, Anstis T (1974) Muscular and joint-receptor components in postural persistence. J Exp Psychol 103:167–170
Jones LA (1989) Matching forces: constant errors and differential thresholds. Perception 18:681–687
Lim JS, Rabinowitz WM, Braida LD, Durlach NI (1977) Intensity perception. VIII. Loudness comparisons between different types of stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am 62:1256–1267
MacRae AW (1970) Channel capacity in absolute judgement tasks: an artifact of information bias? Psychol Bull 73:112–121
Miller GA (1954) Notes on the bias of information estimates. In: Quastler H (ed) Information theory in psychology. Free Press, Glencoe, Ill, pp 95–100
Miller GA (1956) The magic number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev 63:81–97
Moray N (1967) Where is capacity limited? A survey and a model. Acta Psychol 27:84–92
Poulton EC (1979) Models for biases in judging sensory magnitude. Psychol Bull 86:777–803
Redding GM, Wallace B (1990) Effects on prism adaptation of duration and timing of visual feedback during pointing. J Mot Behav 22:209–224
Sackitt B, Lestienne F, Zeffiro A (1983) The information transmitted at final position in visually triggered forearm movements. Biol Cybern 46:111–118
Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 27:379–423
Shannon CE, Weaver W (1964) The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana
Snodgrass JG (1975). Psychophysics. In: Scharf B (ed) Experimental sensory psychology. Scott, Glenview, Ill, pp 16–67
Stevens SS, Greenbaum HB (1966) Regression effect in psychophysical judgement. Percept Psychophys 1:439–446
Wann JP, Ibrahim SF (1992) Does limb proprioception drift? Exp Brain Res 91:162–166
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Clark, F.J., Larwood, K.J., Davis, M.E. et al. A metric for assessing acuity in positioning joints and limbs. Exp Brain Res 107, 73–79 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00228018
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00228018