Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Bibliography
Adams, E. W.: 1955, Axiomatic Foundations of Rigid Body Mechanics. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.
Adams, E. W.: 1959, ‘The Foundations of Rigid Body Mechanics and the Derivation of its Laws from those of Particle Mechanics’, in L. Henkin, P. Suppes and A. Tarski (eds.), The Axiomatic Method, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp. 250–265.
Diederich, W.: 1975, Review of Sneed [25] and Stegmüller [28], in Philosophische Rundschau, Vol. 21, No. 3/4, pp. 209–228.
Feyerabend, P.: 1970, ‘Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge’, in M. Radner and S. Winokur (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 4, pp. 17–130.
van Fraassen, Bas C.: 1972, ‘A Formal Approach to the Philosophy of Science’, in R. G. Colodny (ed.), Paradigms and Paradoxes, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, pp. 303–366.
Girill, T. R.: 1973, Review of I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.), ‘Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge’, in Metaphilosophy, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 246–260.
Hintikka, J.: 1969, ‘Epistemic Logic and the Method of Philosophical Analysis’, in J. Hintikka, Models for Modalities, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland, pp. 3–19.
McKinsey, J. C. C., Sugar, A. C. and Suppes, P.: 1953, ‘Axiomatic Foundations of Classical Mechanics’, Journal of Rational Mechanics and Analysis, Vol. 2, pp. 253–272.
Kuhn, T. S.: 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, (2nd ed.), University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Kuhn, T. S.: 1970, ‘Logic of Discovery or Psychology of Research?’, in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1–23.
Kuhn, T. S.: 1970, ‘Reflections on My Critics’, in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, pp. 231–278.
Kuhn, T. S.: 1972. ‘Notes on Lakatos’, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. VIII, pp. 137–146.
Kuhn, T. S.: 1973, ‘Objectivity, Value-Judgment and Theory Choice’, The Franklin J. Machette Lecture, Furman University.
Kuhn, T. S.: 1976, ‘A Formalism for Scientific Change’, this issue, pp. 179–199, and Proceedings of the 5th International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, London-Ontario.
Lakatos, I.: 1970, ‘Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programme’, in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, pp. 91–195.
Lakatos, I.: 1972, ‘History of Science and Its Rational Reconstruction’, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. VIII, pp. 91–136.
Ludwig, G.: 1970, Deutung des Begriffs ‘physikalische Theorie’ und axiomatische Grundlegung der Hilbertraumstruktur der Quantenmechanik durch Hauptsätze des Messens, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg.
Moulines, C.-U.: 1975, Zur logischen Rekonstruktion der Thermodynamik, Diss., Universität München.
Moulines, C.-U.: 1975, ‘A Logical Reconstruction of Simple Equilibrium Thermodynamics’, Erkenntnis, Vol. 9, pp. 101–130.
Popper, K. R.: 1970, ‘Normal Science and its Dangers’, in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1–23.
Popper, K. R.: 1975, ‘The Rationality of Scientific Revolutions’, in R. Harré (ed.), Problems of Scientific Revolution: Progress and Obstacles to Progress in the Sciences. The Herbert Spencer Lectures 1973, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 72–101.
Rubin, H. and Suppes, P.: 1954, ‘Transformations of Systems of Relativistic Particle Mechanics’, Pacific Journal of Mathematics, Vol. 4, pp. 563–601.
Scheffler, I.: 1963, The Anatomy of Inquiry, Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
Scheffler, I.: 1967, Science and Subjectivity, Bobbs-Merrill Company, New York.
Sneed, J. D.: 1971, The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht.
Sneed, J. D.: 1976, ‘Describing Revolutionary Scientific Change: A Formal Approach’, to appear in Proceedings of the 5th International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, London-Ontario.
Sneed, J. D.: 1976, ‘Philosophical Problems in the Empirical Science of Science: A Formal Approach’, this issue, pp. 115–146.
Stegmüller, W.: 1973, ‘Probleme und Resultate der Wissenschaftstheorie und Analytischen Philospphie’, Band II, Theorie und Erfahrung: Zweiter Halbband, Theorienstrukturen und Theoriendynamik, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg. English Translation Springer-Verlag, New York, 1976.
Stegmüller, W.: 1975, ‘Structures and Dynamics of Theories. Some Reflections on J. D. Sneed and T. S. Kuhn’, Erkenntnis, Vol. 9, pp. 75–100.
Watkins, J.: 1970, ‘Against ‘Normal Science’’, in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, pp. 25–37.
Wittgenstein, L.: 1969, Uber Gewißheit. On Certainty, edited by G. E. M. Anscombe and G. H. Wright, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stegmüller, W. Accidental (‘non-substantial’) theory change and theory dislodgement: To what extent logic can contribute to a better understanding of certain phenomena in the dynamics of theories. Erkenntnis 10, 147–178 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00204968
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00204968