Summary
As the raw material base for forest products manufacturing shifts from old-growth to short-rotation plantation stock, the wood from these younger trees will contain larger proportions of juvenile wood. This in turn will influence the quality of forest products obtained. The pattern of specific gravity variation in these trees, which varies among the five most important Pacific Northwest species groups, is reviewed, and the nature of their differences is related to growth habit. The shade intolerance of some species is speculated to manifest itself in an early culmination of annual height inrement, after which specific gravity increases rapidly to a maximum. This is contrasted to shade-tolerant species, in which specific gravity may take several decades to attain a minimum value, followed by only moderate increases thereafter. In addition, faster growth rates in widely spaced plantation trees tend to depress specific gravity and advance the age at which these trees reach their minimum value, thereby compounding the overall wood density of deficit of short-rotation trees.
Lower specific gravity, compounded with reduced lignin content in juvenile wood, negatively influences kraft pulp yield, but not pulp quality parameters such as sheet density, burst and tensile strength. Reduced wood density, coupled with larger fibril angles in juvenile wood, reduces average strength and stiffness of lumber from younger plantation trees. Mechanical stress rating needs to be adopted to segregate the strong, stiff material for engineered construction uses, because a large proportion of visually graded lumber from juvenile wood zones will not meet currently assigned stress values. Mechanical stress rating can ensure a continued stream of appropriate engineering grades from future tree supplies.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Barbour, J.; Charet, G. 1988: Evaluation of basic wood properties of black spruce (Picea mariana) for Quebec. Report No. 1, Forintek Can. Corp. 141 pp
Barrett, J. D.; Kellogg, R. M. 1991: Bending strength and stiffness of second-growth Douglas-fir dimension lumber. For. Prod. J. 41 (10): 35–43
Bendsten, B. A.; Plantiga, P. A.; Snellgrove, T. A. 1988: The influence of juvenile wood on the mechanical properties of 2×4 cut from Douglas-fir plantations. In: Proc. International Conference on Timber Engineering, Seattle, Washington, pp. 226–240
Biblis, E. J. 1990: Properties and grade yield of lumber from a 27 year old slash pine plantation. For. Prod. J. 40 (3): 21–24
Biblis, E. J.; Brinker, R.; Carino, H.; McKee, C. W. 1993: Effct of stand age on flexural properties and grade compliance of lumber from loblolly pine plantation timber. For. Prod. J. 43 (2): 23–28
Brazier, J. D. 1967: Timber improvement I. A study of the variation in wood characteristics in young Sitka spruce. Forestry 40: 117–128
Briggs, D. G.; Smith, W. R. 1986: Effects of silvicultural practices on wood properties of conifers: a review. In: Douglas-fir:Stand Management for the Future. Oliver, C. D. et al. (ed.) Coll. For. Resources, University of Washington, pp 108–117
Bryan, J.; Pearson, F. G. O. 1955: The quality of Sitka spruce grown in Britain. Emp. For. Review 34: 144–159
Burns, R. M. 1989: The scientific basis for silvicultural and management decisions in the national forest system. U.S. For. Serv. General Tech. Report WO-55. 180 pp
Cave, I. D.; Walker, J. C. F. 1994: Stiffness of wood in fast-grown plantation softwoods: the influence of microfibril angle. For. Prod. J. 44 (5): 43–48
Chang, C. I.; Kennedy, R. W. 1967: Influence of specific gravity and growth rate on dry wood production in plantation-grown white spruce. For. Chron. 43 (2): 165–173
Corriveau, A.; Beulieu, J. 1987: Wood density of natural white spruce populations in Quebec. Can. J. For. Res. 17: 675–682
DeBell, J. D.; Tappeiner II, J. C.; Krahmer, R. L. 1994: Wood density of western hemlock: effect of ring width. Can. J. For. Res. 24: 638–641
DiLucca, C. M. 1989: Juvenile-mature wood transition. In: Second-Growth Douglas-fir: Its Management and Conversion for Value. Kellogg, R. M. (ed.). Forintek Can. Corp. SP-32. pp 59–65
Dodd, R. S.; Power, A. B. 1986: Variation in wood structure of white fir along an elevational transect. Can. J. For. Res. 16: 303–310
Echols, R. M. 1955: Linear relation of fibrillar angle to tracheid length, and genetic control of tracheid length in slash pine. Trop. Woods 102: 11–22
Elliott, G. K. 1960: The distribution of tracheid length in a single stem of Sitka spruce. J. Inst. Wood Sci. 5: 38–47
Elliott, G. K. 1970: Wood density in conifers. Tech. Comm. No. 8, Commonw. For. Bur., Oxford. 44 pp
Erickson, H. D.; Arima, T. 1974: Douglas-fir wood quality studies. Part 2: Effects of age and stimulated growth on fibril angle and chemical constituents. Wood Sci. Tech. 8: 255–265
Fahey, T. D.; Cahill, J. M.; Snellgrove, T. A.; Heath, L. S. 1991: Lumber and veneer recovery from intensively managed young-growth Douglas-fir. U.S. Dept. Agr., For. Serv. Rept. PNW-RP-437
Hatton, J. V.; Cook, J. 1992: Kraft pulp from second growth Douglas-fir: relationships between wood, fiber, pulp and handsheet properties. Tappi 75 (1): 137–144
Hatton, J. V.; Gee, W. Y. 1994: Kraft pulping of second-growth lodgepole pine. Tappi 77 (6): 91–102
Hatton, J. V.; Hunt, K. 1992: Wood density and chemical properties of second-growth lodgepole pine. In: Tappi 1992 Pulping Conference Proc: 873–882
Hatton, J. V.; Johal, S. S. 1994: Mechanical and chemithermomechanical pulps from second-growth softwoods. Pulp and Pap. Can. 95 (12): 67–73
Hatton, J. V.; Keays, J. L. 1972: Complete tree utilization studies III. Yield and quality of kraft pulp from the components of Pseudotsuga menziesii. Tappi 55 (10): 1505–1508
Ifju, G.; Kennedy, R. W. 1962: Some variable affecting microtensile strength of Douglas-fir. For. Prod. J. 12 (5): 213–217
Jackson, M.; Megraw, R. A. 1986: Impact of juvenile wood on pulp and paper products. In: Juvenile Wood —What does it Mean to Forest Management and Forest Products? For. Prod. Res. Soc. Proc. 43709
Jeffers, J. W. 1959: Regression models of variation in specific gravity in four provenances of Sitka spruce. J. Inst. Wood Sci. 4: 44–59
Jessome, A. P. 1977: Strength and related properties of woods grown in Canada. Forestry Tech. Report No. 21, Ottawa 37 pp
Jozsa, L. A.; Middleton, G. R. 1995: A discussion of wood quality attributes and their practical implications. Forintek Can. Corp. SP-34
Jozsa, L. A.; Richards, J.; Johnson, S. G. 1989: Relative density. In: Second Growth Douglas-fir: Its Management and Conversion for Value. Kellogg, R. M. (ed.) Forintek Can. Corp., SP-32. pp 5–22
Keays, J. L.; Hatton, J. V. 1971a: Complete tree utilization studies. I. Yield and quality of kraft pulp from the components of Tsuga heterophylla. Tappi 54 (1): 99–104
Keays, J. L.; Hatton, J. V. 1971b: Complete tree utilization studies. II. Yield and quality of kraft pulp from the components of Picea glauca. Tappi 54 (10): 1721–1724
Kennedy, R. W. 1966: Intra-increment variation and heritability of specific gravity, parallel-to-grain tensile strength, stiffness and tracheid length in clonal Norway spruce. Tappi 49 (7): 292–296
Kennedy, R. W.; Jaworsky, J. M. 1960: Variation in cellulose content of Douglas-fir. Tappi 43 (1): 25–27
Kennedy, R. W.; Swann, G. W. 1969: Comparative specific gravity and strength of amabilis fir and western hemlock grown in British Columbia. Information Report No. VP-X-5. Can. Dept. of Fisheries and Forestry. 16 pp
Kennedy, R. W.; Warren, W. G. 1969: Within-tree variation in physical and chemical properties of Douglas-fir. FAO Second World Counsul. on For. Tree Breeding. FO-FTB-69-4/4. 20 pp
Kennedy, R. W.; Wilson, J. W. 1954: Studies on smooth and cork bark Abies lasiocarpa II. Specific gravity comparisons. Pulp and Paper Mag. Can. 55 (8): 119–121
Kirk, D. B.; Breeman, L. G.; Zobel, B. J. 1972: A pulping evaluation of young loblolly pine wood. Tappi 55 (11): 1600–1604
Koch, P. 1987; Gross characteristics of lodgepole pine trees in North America. U.S. Dept. Agr., For. Serv. Report INT-227. 311 pp
Kraemer, J. H. 1950: Growth-strength relations of red pine. J. For. 48 (12): 842–849
Krahmer, R. L. 1966: Variation of specific gravity in western hemlock trees. Tappi 49: (5): 227–229
Kretschmann, D. E.; Bendsten, B. A. 1992: Ultimate tensile stress and modulus of elasticity of fast-grown plantation loblolly pine lumber. Wood and Fiber Sci. 24 (2): 189–203
Kučera, B. 1994: A hypothesis relating current annual height increment to juvenile wood formation in Norway spruce. Wood and Fiber Sci. 26 (1): 152–167
Larson, P. R. 1963: Evaluating the environment for the inheritance of wood properties. FAO World Consult. on For. Genet., Stockholm. FORGEN 63/-7/1
Littleford, T. W. 1961: Variation of strength properties within trees and between trees in a stand of rapid-grown Douglas-fir. Can. Dept. of Forestry, For. Prod. Lab. Vancouver, memo V-1028. 20 pp
MacPeak, M. D.; Burkart, L. F.; Weldon, D. 1990: Comparison of grades, yields, and mechanical properties of lumber produced from young, fast-grown and old, slow-grown plantation slash pine. For. Prod. J. 40 (1): 11–14
Megraw, R. A. 1986: Douglas-fir wood properties. In: Douglas-fir: Stand Management for the future. C.D. Oliver et al. (ed.) Coll. For. Resources, University of Washington, pp 81–96
Petty, J. A.; MacMillan, D. C.; Steward, C. M. 1990: Variation of density and growth ring width in stems of Sitka and Norway spruce. Forestry 63: 39–49
Pearson, R. G.; Gilmore, R. C. 1971: Characterization of the strength of juvenile wood of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). For. Prod. J. 21 (1): 23–30
Pearson, R. G.; Gilmore, R. C. 1980: Effect of fast growth rate on the mechanical properties of loblolly pine. For. Prod. J. 30 (5): 47–54
Pellerin, R. F.; Koch, P.; Vogt, J. J. 1989: Mechanical properties of lodgepole pine; three-inch diameter stems. For. Prod. J. 39 (4): 63–66
Savill, P. S.; Sandels, A. J. 1983: The influence of early respacing on the wood density of Sitka spruce. Forestry 56 (2): 109–122
Schaible, R.; Gawn, L. J. 1989: Variation in timber strength of fast-grown unthinned Sitka spruce in Northern Ireland. Irish Forestry 46 (1): 43–50
Schutt, P. 1962: Individuelle und bestandweise Schwankungen der Holzdichte und der Faserlänge bei Pinus contorta. Papier 16: 671–675
Senft, J. F.; Quanci, M. J.; Bendsten, B. A. 1986: Property profile of 60-year old Douglas-fir. In: Juvenile Wood — What does it Mean to Forest Management and Forest Products? For. Prod. Res. Soc. Proc. 47309. pp 17–25
Smith, J. H. G. 1980: Influence of spacing on radial growth and percentage latewood of Douglas-fir, western hemlock, and western red cedar. Can. J. For. Res. 10: 169–175
Smith, J. H. G.; Kennedy, R. W. 1983: Effects of stand management on tree, log and wood quality of Douglas-fir. Proc. Supplement, IUFRO Div. 5 Conf., Madison, Wis.
Swann, E. P.; Nault, J. R.; Daniels, C. R.; Cook, J. A. 1989: Chemical Properties. In: Second-Growth Douglas-fir: Its Management and Conversion for Value. Kellogg, R. M. (ed.) Forintek Can. Corp. SP-32. pp 59–65
Taylor, F. W.; Wang, E. I. C.; Micko, M. M. 1982: Differences in the wood of lodgepole pine in Alberta. Wood and Fiber 14 (4): 296–309
Taylor, F. W.; Wang, E. I. C.; Yanchuk, A.; Micko, M. M. 1982: Specific gravity and tracheid length variation in white spruce in Alberta. Can. J. For. Res. 12: 561–566
Villeneuve, M.; Morgenstern, E. K.; Sebastian, L. P. 1987: Variation patterns and age relationships of wood density on families of jack pine and black spruce. Can. J. For. Res. 17: 1219–1222
Wang, E. I. C.; Micko, M. M. 1984: Wood quality of white spruce from north central Alberta. Can. J. For. Res. 1: 181–185
Wellwood, R. W. 1960: Specific gravity and tracheid length variations in second-growth western hemlock. J. For. 58: 361–368
Wellwood, R. W. 1962: Tensile testing of small wood samples. Pulp and Paper Mag. Can. 63 (2): T61-T68
Wellwood, R. W.; Smith, J. H. G. 1962: Variation in some important qualities of wood from young Douglas-fir and hemlock trees. Research Paper No. 50, Faculty of Forestry, University of B.C. 15 pp
Zhou, H.; Smith, I. 1991: Factors influencing bending properties of white spruce lumber. Wood and Fiber Sci. 23 (4): 483–500
Zobel, B. J.; van Buijtenen, J. P. 1989: Wood Variation: Its Causes and Control. Springer-Verlag, New York, 363 pp
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I am indebted to Professor Simon Ellis of the Department of Wood Science, Faculty of Forestry, University of B.C., for providing data on mechanical tests of western hemlock
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kennedy, R.W. Coniferous wood quality in the future: concerns and strategies. Wood Sci.Technol. 29, 321–338 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00202581
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00202581