Abstract
We reviewed the medical records and defecograms in 55 consecutive patients to determine the impact of results of defecography on clinical management. Main indication for defecography was constipation, present in 40 (73%) of 55 patients. In the remaining 15 patients, indications included obstructed defecation (5), incontinence (5), and miscellaneous symptoms (5). Defecography evaluated pelvic floor motion by assessing changes in the anorectal angle (ARA) and anorectal junction (ARJ) during various maneuvers, extent of evacuation, and structural abnormalities. Patients were grouped based on results of defecography as being normal (26) or abnormal (29). Comparison of measurements of the ARA and ARJ with various maneuvers showed no significant differences between the two groups. Clinical impact was determined by analyzing therapy done following defecography and subsequent patient response. In the normal group, 15 patients were managed medically, seven surgically, and four lost to follow-up. Clinical improvement occurred in 13 (59%) of 22 patients, with similar results between medical (60%) and surgical (57%) therapy. In the abnormal group, 16 had medical management, seven surgical therapy, and six lost to follow-up. Clinical improvement occurred in 13 (57%) of 23 patients but surgical therapy showed more improvement. In conclusion, most standard measurements of the ARA and ARJ were of no value in determining abnormality. Results of defecography did not alter selection of medical or surgical therapy, and had little impact on patient response to therapy.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Mahieu P, Pringot J, Bodart P. Defecography: I. description of a new procedure and results in normal patients. Gastrointest Radiol 1984;9:247–251
Mahieu P, Pringot J, Bodart P. Defecography: II. contribution to the diagnosis of defecation disorders. Gastrointest Radiol 1984;9:253–261
Ekberg O, Nylander G, Fork F-T. Defecography. Radiology 1985;155:45–48
Karasick S, Karasick D, Karasick SR. Functional disorders of the anus and rectum: findings on defecography. AJR 1993:160:777–782
Bartram CI, Turnbull GK, Lennard-Jones JE. Evacuation proctography: an investigation of rectal expulsion in 20 subjects without defecatory disturbance. Gastrointest Radiol 1988;13:72–80
Finlay IG (moderator). Proctography. Int J Colorect Dis 1988:3:67–89
Goei R, van Engelshoven J, Schouten H, Baeten C, Stassen C. Anorectal function: defecographic measurement in asymptomatic subjects. Radiology 1989;173:137–141
Shorvon PJ, McHugh S, Diamant NE, Somers S, Stevenson GW. Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications. Gut 1989;30:1737–1749
Levine MS, Piccolello ML, Sollenberger LC, Laufer I, Saul SH. Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: a radiologic diagnosis? Gastrointest Radiol 1986;11:187–193
Mahieu PHG. Barium enema and defaecography in the diagnosis and evaluation of the solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Int J Colorect Dis 1986;1:85–90
Goei R, Baeten C, Janevski B, van Engelshoven J. The solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: diagnosis with defecography. AJR 1987;149:933–936
Kuijpers HC, Bleijenberg G, de Morree H. The spastic pelvic floor syndrome. Int J Colorect Dis 1986;1:44–88
Skomorowska E, Hegedüs V, Christiansen J. Evaluation of perineal descent by defaecography. Int J Colorectal Dis 1988;3:191–194
Felt-Bersma RJF, Luth WJ, Janssen JJWM, Meuwissen SGM. Defecography in patients with anorectal disorders: which findings are clinically relevant? Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:277–284
Goei R. Anorectal function in patients with defecation disorders and asymptomatic subjects: evaluation with defecography. Radiology 1990:174:121–123
Penninckx F, Debruyne C, Lestar B, Kerremans R. Intraobserver variation in the radiological measurement of the anorectal angle. Gastrointest Radiol 1991;16:73–76
Skomorowska E, Henricksen S, Christiansen J, Hegedüs V. Videodefaecography combined with measurement of the anorectal angle and of perineal descent. Acta Radiol 1987;28:559–562
Pinho M, Yoshioka K, Keighley MRB. Are pelvic floor movements abnormal in disordered defecation? Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:1117–1119
Turnbull GK, Bartram CI, Lennard-Jones JE. Radiologic studies of rectal evacuation in adults with idiopathic constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 1988;31:190–197
Ting KH, Mangel E, Eibl-Eibesfeldt B. Is the volume retained after defecation a valuable parameter at defecography? Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:762–767
Wald A, Caruana BJ, Freimanis MG, Bauman DH, Hinds JP. Contributions of evacuation proctography and anorectal manometry to evacuation of adults with constipation and defecatory difficulty. Dig Dis Sci 1990;35:481–487
Infantino A, Masin A, Pianon P, Dodi G, Del Favero G, Pomerri F, Lise M. Role of proctography in severe constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:707–712
Kelvin FM, Maglinte DDT, Hornback JA, Benson JT. Pelvic prolapse: assessment with evacuation proctography (defecography). Radiology 1992;184:547–551
Archer BD, Somers S, Stevenson GW. Contrast medium gel for marking vaginal position during defecography. Radiology 1992;182:278–279
Poon FW, Lauder JC, Finlay IG. Technical report: evacuating proctography—a simplified technique. Clin Radiol 1991;44:113–116
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ott, D.J., Donati, D.L., Kerr, R.M. et al. Defecography: Results in 55 patients and impact on clinical management. Abdom Imaging 19, 349–354 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00198197
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00198197