Summary
Compound eyes of the decapod shrimp Gennadas, the hermit crab Dardanus, and the syncarid crustacean Anaspides are studied histologically and with optical experiments. The results demonstrate that these three crustaceans all have refracting superposition eyes. The conclusion is based on the following observations:
-
1.
There is a wide clear-zone, which allows for a superposition image to be formed.
-
2.
Dark-adapted eyes display a large eye-glow, and the ommatidia are not optically isolated.
-
3.
The crystalline cones have the shape typical for refracting superposition eyes, and they contain the required lens-cylinder gradient of refractive index.
Euphausiids and mysids were previously thought to be the only crustaceans with refracting superposition eyes, whereas the species investigated here were assumed to have reflecting superposition eyes (decapod shrimps) or apposition eyes (hermit crabs and syncarids). The present findings increase more than twofold the number of crustacean groups that are known to have developed refracting superposition optics. It also provides insight into the evolutionary mechanisms that may have led to the development of this type of imaging optics.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bursey CR (1975) The microanatomy of the compound eye of Munida irrasa (Decapoda: Galatheidae). Cell Tissue Res 160:505–514
Exner S (1891) Die Physiologie der facettirten Augen von Krebsen und Insecten. English translation by Hardie R (1988) The physiology of the compound eyes of insects and crustaceans. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Kampa EM (1963) The structure of the eye of a galatheid crustacean, Pleuroncodes planipes. Crustaceana 6:69–80
Land MF (1981) Optics and vision in invertebrates. In: Autrum H (ed) Vision in invertebrates (Handbook of sensory physiology, Vol VII/6B). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 471–592
Land MF (1984a) The resolving power of diurnal superposition eyes measured with an ophthalmoscope. J Comp Physiol A 154:515–533
Land MF (1984b) Crustacea. In: Ali MA (ed) Photoreception and vision in invertebrates. Plenum, New York, pp 401–438
Land MF, Burton FA (1979) The refractive index gradient in the crystalline cones of the eyes of an euphausiid crustacean. J Exp Biol 82:395–398
Land MF, Burton FA, Meyer-Rochow VB (1979) The optical geometry of euphausiid eyes. J Comp Physiol 130:49–62
Meyer-Rochow VB, Walsh S (1977) The eyes of mesopelagic crustaceans. I. Gennadas sp. (Panaeidae). Cell Tissue Res 184:87–101
Nilsson D-E (1983) Evolutionary links between apposition and superposition optics in crustacean eyes. Nature 302:818–821
Nilsson D-E (1988) A new type of imaging optics in compound eyes. Nature 332:76–78
Nilsson D-E (1989) Optics and evolution of the compound eye. In: Stavenga DG, Hardie R (eds) Facets of vision. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 30–73
Nilsson D-E, Odselius R (1981) A new mechanism for light-dark adaptation in the Artemia compound eye (Anostraca, Crustacea). J Comp Physiol 143:389–399
Nilsson D-E, Andersson M, Hallberg E, McIntyre P (1983) A micro-interferometric method for analysis of rotation-symmetric refractive-index gradients in intact objects. J Microsc 132:21–29
Nilsson D-E, Hallberg E, Elofsson R (1986) The ontogenetic development of refracting superposition eyes in crustaceans: Transformation of optical design. Tissue Cell 18:509–519
Nilsson D-E, Land MF, Howard J (1988) Optics of the butterfly eye. J Comp Physiol A 162:341–366
Vogt K (1975) Zur Optik des Flußkrebsauges. Z Naturforsch 30:691
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nilsson, DE. Three unexpected cases of refracting superposition eyes in crustaceans. J Comp Physiol A 167, 71–78 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00192407
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00192407