Abstract
The eyes of galatheid squat lobsters (Munida rugosa) are shown to be of the reflecting superposition type. In the dark-adapted state corneal lenses focus light at the level of the rhabdoms and light from more than 1000 facets is redirected to the superposition focus by the reflecting surfaces of the crystalline cones. When the eye is light adapted, apposition optics are used. In this state paraxial light is focused by the corneal lens and the parabolic proximal end of the cone onto the distal end of a rhabdomeric lightguide. The latter transmits light across the clear zone to the rhabdom layer. In the dorsal part of the eye the individual ommatidia become progressively shorter until the cones and rhabdoms are no longer separated by a clear zone. Although formerly considered to be developing ommatidia, they are shown to be retained specifically for scanning the downwelling irradiance.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Abbreviations
- RI :
-
refractive index
- SEM :
-
scanning electron microscope
References
Arikawa K, Kawamata K, Suzuki T, Eguchi E (1987) Daily changes of structure function and rhodopsin content in the compound eye of the crab Hemigrapsus sanguineus. J Comp Physiol A 161: 161–174
Bryceson KP (1981) Focusing of light by corneal lenses in a reflecting superposition eye. J Exp Biol 90: 347–350
Bursey CR (1975) The microanatomy of the compound eye of Munida irrasa (Decapoda: Galatheidae) Cell Tissue Res 160: 505–514
Caveney S, McIntyre P (1981) Design of graded-index lenses in the superposition eyes of scarab beetles. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 294: 589–632
Douglass JK, Forward RB (1989) The ontogeny of facultative superposition optics in a shrimp eye: hatching through metamorphosis. Cell Tissue Res 258: 289–300
Exner S (1891) Die Physiologie der facettirten Augen von Krebsen und Insecten. Franz Deuticke, Leipzig-Wien
Fincham AA (1980) Eyes and classification of malacostracan crustaceans. Nature 287: 729–731
Fincham AA (1984) Ontogeny and optics of the eyes of the common prawn Palaemon serratus (Pennant 1777). Zool J Linn Soc 81: 89–113
Fincham AA (1988) Ontogeny of anomuran eyes. Symp Zool Soc 59: 123–155
Galbraith W (1955) The optical measurement of depth. Q J Microsc Sci 96: 285–288
Gaten E (1990) The ultrastructure of the compound eye of Munida rugosa (Crustacea: Anomura) and pigment migration during light and dark adaptation. J Morphol 205: 243–253
Gaten E, Shelton PMJ (1993) Spatial resolution in benthic decapods, determined by electrophysiological measurement of acceptance angle. J Physiol (Lond) 467: 371P
Gaten E, Shelton PMJ, Chapman CJ, Shanks AM (1990) Depth-related variation in structure and functioning of the compound eyes of the Norway lobster Nephrops norvegiens. J Mar Biol Assoc 70: 343–355
Hafner GS, Tokarski T, Hammond-Soltis G (1982) Development of the crayfish retina: A light and electron microscopic study. J Morphol 173: 101–118
Horridge GA (1971) The retina of Ephestia (Lepidoptera). Proc R Soc Lond B 171: 445–463
Horridge GA, Marçelja L, Jahnke R (1982) Light guides in the dorsal eye of the male mayfly. Proc R Soc Lond B 216: 25–51
Howard FG (1981) Squat lobsters. Scottish Fisheries Bulletin 46: 13–16
Kampa EM (1963) The structure of the eye of a galatheid crustacean Pleuroncodes planipes. Crustaceana 6: 69–80
Kampa EM (1965) The euphausiid eye — a re-evaluation. Vision Res 5:475–481
Kirschfeld K (1974) The absolute sensitivity of lens and compound eyes. Z Naturforsch 29c: 592–596
Kunze P (1968) Die Orientierung der Retinulazellen im Auge von Ocypode. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat 90: 454–462
Kunze P (1979) Apposition and superposition eyes. In: Autrum H (ed) Vision in invertebrates (Handbook of Sensory Physiology, vol VII/6A) Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 441–502
Land MF (1972) The physics and biology of animal reflectors. Progr Biophys Molec Biol 24: 75–106
Land MF (1976) Superposition images are formed by reflection in the eyes of some oceanic decapod Crustacea. Nature 263: 764–765
Land MF (1981a) Optical mechanisms in the higher Crustacea with a comment on their evolutionary origins. In: Laverack MS, Cosens DJ (eds) Sense organs. Blackie, London Glasgow, pp 31–48
Land MF (1981b) Optics and vision in invertebrates. In: Autrum H (ed) Vision in invertebrates (Handbook of Sensory Physiology, vol VII/6B) Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 471–492
Land MF (1981c) Optics of the eyes of Phronima and other deep-sea amphipods. J Comp Physiol 145: 209–226
Land MF (1984a) Crustacea. In: Ali MA (ed) Photoreception and vision in invertebrates. Plenum Press, New York, pp 401–438
Land MF (1984b) The resolving power of diurnal superposition eyes measured with an ophthalmoscope. J Comp Physiol A 154: 515–533
Land MF (1989) The eyes of hyperiid amphipods: relations of optical structure to depth. J Comp Physiol A 164: 751–762
Land MF, Burton FA, Meyer-Rochow VB (1979) The optical geometry of euphausiid eyes. J Comp Physiol 130: 49–62
Nässel DR (1976) The retina and retinal projection on the lamina ganglionaris of the crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus Dana. J Comp Neurol 167: 341–360
Nilsson D-E (1983a) Evolutionary links between apposition and superposition optics in crustacean eyes. Nature 302: 818–821
Nilsson D-E (1983b) Refractive index gradients subserve optical isolation in a light-adapted reflecting superposition eye. J Exp Zool 225: 161–165
Nilsson D-E (1988) A new type of imaging optics in compound eyes. Nature 332: 76–78
Nilsson D-E (1989) Optics and evolution of the compound eye. In: Hardie RH, Stavenga DG (eds) Facets of vision. Springer, Berlin, pp 30–73
Nilsson D-E (1990a) Three unexpected cases of refracting superposition eyes in crustaceans. J Comp Physiol A 167: 71–78
Nilsson D-H (1990b) From cornea to retinal image in invertebrate eyes. Trends Neurosci 13: 55–63
Parker GH (1895) The retina and optic ganglia in decapods especially in Astacus. Mitt Zool Stat Neapel 12: 56–63
Pike RB (1947) Galathea. Liverpool Mar Biol Comm Mem 34: 1–178
Robertson JD (1949) Ionic regulation in some marine invertebrates. J Exp Biol 26: 182–200
Shaw SR, Stowe S (1982) Photoreception. In: Atwood HL, Sandeman DC (eds) The biology of Crustacea. Academic Press, New York, pp 291–367
Shelton PMJ, Shelton RGJ, Richards PR (1981) Eye development in relation to moult stage in the European lobster Homarus gammarus (L.) J Cons Int Explor Mer 39: 239–243
Shelton PMJ, Gaten E, Herring PJ (1992) Adaptations of tapeta in the eyes of mesopelagic decapod shrimps to match the oceanic irradiance distribution. J Mar Biol Assoc 72: 77–88
Snyder AW (1975) Photoreceptor optics theoretical principles. In: Snyder AW, Menzel R (eds) Photoreceptor optics. Springer,Berlin, pp 38–55
Snyder AW (1977) Acuity of compound eyes. Physical limitations and design. J Comp Physiol 116: 161–182
Stavenga DG (1979) Pseudopupils of compound eyes. In: Autrum H (ed) Vision in invertebrates (Handbook of Sensory Physiology, vol VII/6A) Springer,Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp357–439
Stowe S (1977) The retina lamina projection in the crab Leptograspsus variegatus. Cell Tissue Res 185: 515–525
Tanaka K, Naguro T (1981) High resolution scanning electron microscopy of cell organelles by a new specimen preparation method. Biomed Res 2: 63–70
Van Hateren JH (1989) Photoreceptor optics theory and practice. In: Hardie RH, Stavenga DG (eds) Facets of vision. Springer, Berlin, pp 74–89
Varela FG, Wiitanen W (1970) The optics of the compound eye of the honeybee (Apis mellifera). J Gen Physiol 55: 336–358
Vogt K (1975) Optik des Flusskrebsauges. Z Naturforsch 30c: 691
Vogt K (1977) Ray path and reflection mechanisms in crayfish eyes. Z Naturforsch 32: 466–468
Vogt K (1980) Die Spiegeloptik des Flusskrebsauges. J Comp Physiol 135: 1–19
Warrant EJ, McIntyre PD (1991) Strategies for retinal design in arthropod eyes of low F-number. J Comp Physiol A 168: 499–512
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gaten, E. Geometrical optics of a galatheid compound eye. J Comp Physiol A 175, 749–759 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00191846
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00191846