Abstract
The effect of turbulence manipulators on the turbulent boundary layer above a flat plate has been investigated. These turbulence manipulators are often referred to as Large Eddy Break Up (LEBU) devices. The basic idea is that thin blades or airfoils are inserted into the turbulent flow in order to reduce the fluctuating vertical velocity component v′ above the flat plate. In this way, the turbulent momentum transfer and with it the wall shear stress downstream of the manipulator should be decreased. In our experiments, for comparison, a merely drag-producing wire also was inserted into the boundary layer.
In particular, the trade-off between the drag of the turbulence manipulator and the drag reduction due to the shear-stress reduction on the flat plate downstream of the manipulator has been considered. The measurements were carried out with very accurate force balances for both the manipulator drag and the shear stress on the flat plate. As it turns out, no net drag reduction is found for a fairly large set of configurations. A single thin blade as a manipulator performed best, i.e., it was closest to break-even. However, a further improvement is unlikely, because the device drag of the thin blade elements used here has already been reduced to only that due to laminar skin friction, and is thus the minimum possible drag. Airfoils performed slightly worse, because their device drag was higher. A purely drag-producing wire device performed disastrously. The wire device, which consisted of a wire with another thin wire wound around it to suppress coherent vortex shedding and vibration, was designed to have (and did have) the same drag as the airfoil manipulator with which it was compared. The comparison showed that airfoil and blade manipulators recovered 75–90% of their device drag through a shear-stress reduction downstream, whereas the wire device recovered only about 25–30% of its device drag.
Conventional LEBU manipulators with airfoils or thin blades produce between 0.25% and 1% net drag increase, whereas the wire device (with equal device drag) produces as much as 4% net drag increase. These data are valid for the specific plate length of our experiments, which was long enough in downstream extent to realize the full effect of the LEBU manipulators. Turbulence manipulators do indeed decrease the turbulent momentum exchange in the boundary layer by “rectifying” the turbulent fluctuations. This generates a significant shear-stress reduction downstream, which is much more than just the effect of the wake of the manipulator. However, the device drag of the manipulator cannot be reduced without simultaneously reducing the skin friction reduction. Thus, the manipulator's device drag exceeds, or at best cancels, the drag reduction achieved by the shear-stress reduction downstream. A critical survey of previous investigations shows that the suggestion that turbulence manipulators may produce net drag reduction is also not supported by the available previous drag force measurements. The issue had been stirred up by less conclusive measurements based on local velocity data, i.e., data collected using the so-called momentum balance technique.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Abbreviations
- b :
-
lateral breadth of test plate
- c :
-
chord length of turbulence manipulator
- d :
-
diameter of wire manipulator
- e :
-
distance of the elastic center from the leading edge of the manipulator airfoil
- h :
-
height of manipulator above test plate
- q :
-
dynamic pressure of the potential flow above the test plate
- s :
-
spacing of turbulence manipulator elements
- t :
-
thickness of turbulence manipulator elements
- u′,v′,w′ :
-
fluctuating velocities in downstream, platenormal, and lateral directions
- x :
-
distance from the leading edge of the test plate in the downstream direction
- x 0 :
-
location of the trailing edge of the first manipulator
- z :
-
distance from test plate center in the lateral direction
- C D :
-
drag coefficient
- C L :
-
lift coefficient
- D m :
-
drag of manipulated plate including device drag and shear stress, calculated from manipulator location to downstream location ξ
- D 0 :
-
drag of unmanipulated plate boundary layer, consisting of the shear stress calculated from manipulator location to downstream location ξ
- F :
-
drag force
- F 0 :
-
total skin friction force, measured over a distance from 0.4 m upstream of manipulator to 6.35 m downstream of manipulator, measured without turbulence manipulator
- F LEBU :
-
device drag force of the LEBU, i.e., the turbulence manipulator
- F m :
-
total drag force of manipulated plate, consisting of
- F LEBU :
-
and skin friction force, measured over a distance from 0.4 m upstream of manipulator to 6.35 m downstream
- F cf :
-
skin friction force as measured by the floating element balance, manipulated case
- F cfo :
-
skin friction force, as measured by the floating element balance, unmanipulated case
- ΔF cf :
-
skin friction saving, defined as ΔF cf = F cf − F cfo
- ∑F cf :
-
cumulative skin friction savings, i.e., the sum of the skin friction savings ΔF cf , added up from the location of the manipulator to the downstream location ξ, as shown in Fig. 11. In Fig. 13 the cumulative skin friction savings are summarized up to their asymptotic value, reached at ξ ≈ 200
- Re c :
-
Reynolds number of the manipulator elements, calculated with the chord length c and the local velocity in the boundary layer
- Re 0 :
-
Reynolds number at the location x 0 of the manipulator, calculated with the momentum thickness θ of the boundary layer and the mean flow velocity U ∞
- U ∞ :
-
mean flow velocity in the potential regime of the wind tunnel test section
- α:
-
angle of attack of the manipulator airfoils
- δ 0 :
-
boundary layer thickness at the location x 0 of the manipulator
- ξ:
-
dimensionless distance from the manipulator in the downstream direction, defined as \(\xi = (x - x_0 )/\delta _0\)
- ϱ:
-
density of the air
- τ 0 :
-
local skin friction shear stress, unmanipulated case
- τ 0 Average :
-
skin friction shear stress, average value over the lateral span (b = 2 m) of the test plate, unmanipulated case
- τ m :
-
local skin friction shear stress, manipulated case
- θ:
-
momentum thickness of the undisturbed turbulent boundary layer at the location x 0
References
Anders JB (1986) Large eddy breakup devices as low Reynolds number airfoils. NASA SAE Technical Paper 861769
Anders JB (1989) LEBU drag reduction in high Reynolds number boundary layers. AIAA-Paper 89-1011
Anders JB; Watson RD (1985) Airfoil large-eddy breakup devices for turbulent drag reduction. AIAA-Paper 85-0520
Anders JB; Hefner JN; Bushnell DM (1984) Performance of large-eddy breakup devices at post-transitional Reynolds numbers. AIAAPaper 84-0345
Bandyopadhyay PR (1985) The performance of smooth-wall drag reducing outer-layer devices in rough-wall boundary layers. AIAA-Paper 85-0558
Bandyopadhyay PR (1986) Mean flow in turbulent boundary layers disturbed to alter skin friction. J Fluids Eng 108: 127–40
Bechert DW; Hoppe G; Reif W-E (1985) On the drag reduction of the shark skin. AIAA-Paper 85-0546
Bertelrud A; Truong TV; Avellan F (1982) Drag reduction in turbulent boundary layers using ribbons. AIAA-Paper 82-1370
Blackwelder RF; Chang SI (1986) Length scales and correlations in a LEBU modified turbulent boundary layer. AIAA-Paper 86-0287
Bonnet JP; Delville J; Lemay J (1987) Study of LEBU's modified turbulent boundary layer by use of passive temperature contamination. International Conference on Turbulent Drag Reduction by Passive Means, The Royal Aeronautical Society, London, Sept. 1987
Bruns J; Dengel P; Fernholz HH (1992) Mean flow and turbulence measurements in an incompressible two-dimensional turbulent boundary layer. Institutsbericht 02/92, Hermann-Föttinger-Institut, TU Berlin
Corke TC (1981) A new view on origin, role and manipulation of large scales in turbulent boundary layers. Ph.D. Thesis, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois, December 1981
Corke TC; Guezennec YG; Nagib HM (1979) Modification in drag of turbulent boundary layers resulting from manipulation of large-scale structures. Presented at the AIAA Symposium on Viscous Drag Reduction, Dallas, Texas, Nov. 7–8, 1979
Corke TC; Nagib HM; Guezennec YG (1982) A new view on origin, role and manipulation of large scales in turbulent boundary layers. NASA CR 165861
Coustols E; Cousteix J (1985) Reduction du frottement turbulent: moderateurs de turbulence. 22ème Colloque d'Aerodynamique Appliquée, Lille, France, Nov. 13–15, 1985
Guezennec YG; Nagib HM (1990) Documentation of mechanisms leading to net drag reduction in manipulated turbulent boundary layers. AIAA J 28: 245–252
Head MR; Rechenberg I (1962) The Preston tube as a means of measuring skin friction. J Fluid Mech 14: 1–17
Hefner JN; Weinstein LM; Bushnell DM (1981) Large-eddy breakup scheme for turbulent viscous drag reduction. AIAA-Paper 81-26507
Hefner JN; Anders JB; Bushnell DM (1983) Alteration of outer flow structures for turbulent drag reduction. AIAA-Paper 83-0293
Katzmayr R (1922) Über das Verhalten von Flügelflächen bei periodischen Änderungen der Geschwindigkeitsrichtung. Zeitschrift für Flugtechnik und Motorluftschiffahrt, 6. Heft, 13, Jahrg., 80–82. And: 7. Heft, 13, Jahrg., 95–101
Lemay J; Provençal D; Gourdeau R; Nguyen VD; Dickinson J (1985) More detailed measurements behind turbulence manipulators including tandem devices using servo-controlled balances. AIAA-Paper 85-0521
Lemay J; Savill AM; Bonnet JP; Delville J (1989) Some similarities between turbulent boundary layers manipulated by thin and thick flat plate manipulators. Turbulent Shear Flows 6, Springer-Verlag, Berlin
Lynn TB (1987) Manipulation of the structure of a turbulent boundary layer. Ph.D. Thesis, Yale University, New Haven, CT., May
Lynn TB (1989) Structures in a turbulent boundary layer. Adv Turb 2: 449–454, Springer-Verlag, Berlin
Lynn TB; Gerich DA; Bechert DW (1989) LEBU-manipulated flat plate boundary layers: skin-friction and device drag measured directly. IAHR Drag Reduction '89 Conference, Davos, Switzerland, July
Mangus JF (1984) Measurement of drag and bursting frequency downstream of tandem spanwise ribbons in a turbulent boundary layer. Master's Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
Miley SJ (1982) A catalog of low Reynolds number airfoil data for wind turbine applications. Dept. of Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA, Report RFP-3387, UC60 and: Addendum (1985)
Morse PM; Ingard KU (1968) 1968 Theoretical acoustics. New York: McGraw-Hill
Mumford JC; Savill AM (1984) Parametric studies of flat plate turbulence manipulators including direct drag results and Laser flow visualization. ASME Symposium on Turbulent and Laminar Boundary Layers, New Orleans, Louisiana
Nagib HM; Guezennec YG; Plesniak M (1984) Progress report for NASA Langley Research Grant, NSG-1591
Narasimha R; Sreenivasan KR (1988) Flat plate drag reduction by turbulence manipulation. Sadhana, India, l. 12, Parts 1 & 2, February, 5–30
Nguyen VD; Dickinson J; Chalifour Y; Anderson J; Lemay J; Haeberle D; Larose G (1984) Some experimental observations of the law of the wall behind Large-Eddy Breakup Devices using servo-controlled skin friction balances. AIAA-Paper 84-0346
Nguyen VD; Savill AM; Westphal RV (1987) Skin friction measurements following manipulation of a turbulent boundary layer. AIAA J 25: 498–500
Papathanasiou AG; Nagel RT (1986) Boundary layer control by acoustic excitation. AIAA-Paper 86-1954
Plesniak MW (1984) Optimized manipulation of turbulent boundary layers aimed at net drag reduction. Master's Thesis, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois, USA
Poddar K; Van Atta CW (1985) Turbulent boundary layer drag reduction on an axisymetric body. 5th Symposium on Turbulent Shear Flows, Cornell University, Aug. 7–9, 1985
Poll DIA; Westland PG (1987) A study of LEBU performance by direct total force measurements. Symposium on Turbulent Drag Reduction by Passive Means, The Royal Aeronautical Society, London, Sept. 87
Pollard A; Savill AM; Thomann HH (1989) Turbulent pipe flow manipulation and modelling. In: Drag Reduction in Fluid Flows: Techniques for Friction Control, 27–34, Eds. Sellin RHJ, Moses RT, Ellis Horwood, Chichester
Prabhu A; Vasudevan B; Kailasnath P; Kulkarmi RS; Narasimha R (1987) Blade manipulators in channel flow. Proceedings IUTAM Symposium on Turbulence Management and Relaminarisation, Bangalore, 97–108, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/New York
Rashidnia N; Falco RE (1986) Changes in the turbulent boundary layer structure associated with net drag reduction by outer layer manipulators. Michigan State University, Turbulent Structures Lab Report TSL-86-1, May 1986
Sahlin A; Alfredsson PH; Johansson AV (1986) Direct drag measurements for a flat plate with passive boundary layer manipulators. Phys Fluids 29: 696–700
Sahlin A; Johansson AV; Alfredsson PH (1988) The possibility of drag reduction by outer layer manipulators in turbulent boundary layers. Phys Fluids 31: 2814–20
Savill AM (1987) On the manner in which outer layer disturbances affect turbulent boundary layer skin friction. Advances in Turbulence, G. Comte-Bellot and J. Mathieu, eds., Springer-Verlag, Berlin
Schlichting H (1982) Grenzschicht-Theorie, Karlsruhe: Verlag G. Braun
Veuve M; Truong TV; Ryhming IL (1989) Detailed measurements downstream of a tandem manipulator in pressure gradients. Presented at the Symposium on Drag Reduction, Lausanne, Switzerland, July 1989
Westphal RV (1986) Skin friction and Reynolds stress measurements for a turbulent boundary layer following manipulation using flat plates. AIAA-Paper 86-0283
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The authors would like to thank Prof. H. H. Fernholz for his scientific and administrative support. The hardware for the experiments was designed and built by C. Daase, W. Hage and R. Makris. Funding for the project was provided by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and is gratefully acknowledged.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lynn, T.B., Bechert, D.W. & Gerich, D.A. Direct drag measurements in a turbulent flat-plate boundary layer with turbulence manipulators. Experiments in Fluids 19, 405–416 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00190258
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00190258