Abstract
There is some evidence to the effect that as cities become increasingly congested new housing starts occur at greater distances from urban centers while jobs tend to remain center-concentrated or develop in other suburbs. In either case, mean commute distances tend to increase. Telecommuting is seen as a means of increasing the jobs-housing balance in urban and suburban areas by enhancing the ability to move work to, or closer to, the workers' residences rather than requiring workers to commute to work daily. This has the immediate side effect of decreasing automobile congestion and associated energy consumption and air pollution. There is a possible longer term adverse impact of telecommuting resulting from its ability to decrease constraints on household location, thereby enhancing the rate of spread of suburbia. This paper reviews evidence concerning the possible effects of telecommuting on urban sprawl, as derived from a two-year test of telecommuting in California, and describes two scenarios of urban form development made more feasible by telecommuting.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
California Legislature (1991a)Assembly Bill No. 993. Sacramento, CA.
California Legislature (1991b)Assembly Bill No. 1065. Sacramento, CA.
CTS:Commuter Transportation Services, Inc. (1990) The State of the Commute: Research Findings for the 1989 Commuter Survey. Los Angeles: Commuter Transportation Services, Inc.
— (1991) The State of the Commute: Research Findings for the 1991 Commuter Survey. Los Angeles: Commuter Transportation Services, Inc.
Hirata EY & Uchida EK (1990) Evaluation of the Hawaii Telework Center Demonstration Project. Honolulu: Hawaii State Department of Transportation.
Hirst E (1973) Energy Intensiveness of Passenger and Freight Transport Modes, 1950–1970. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
JALA Associates, Inc. (1983) Telecommunications and Energy: The Energy Conservation Implications of Telecommunications Substitutes for Transportation, Final Report. Sacramento, CA: California Energy Commission.
— (1990) The California Telecommuting Pilot Project Final Report. Sacramento: Department of General Services and JALA Associates, Inc.
JALA Associates, Inc. (1991a) Preliminary Analysis of Telecommuter-Candidate Commute Distances. Los Angeles.
JALA Associates, Inc. (1991b) Baseline Evaluation of City of Los Angeles Telecommuters. Los Angeles.
Kitamura R, Goulias K & Pendyala RM (1990) Telecommuting and Travel Demand: An Impact Assessment for the State of California Telecommute Pilot Project Participants. Davis, CA: University of California Research Report UCD-TRG-RR-90-8.
Long L & De Are D (1983) The Slowing of Urbanization in the U.S. Scientific American 249, 1: 33–41.
Miller TE (1991) 1991 Telecommuting Data. New York, NY: LINK Resources, Inc.
Mokhtarian PL (1991) Defining Telecommuting. Transportation Research Record.
Nilles JM, Carlson, Jr. FR, Gray P & Hanneman GJ (1974) Development of Policy on the Telecommunications-Transportation Tradeoff University of Southern California and the National Science Foundation, Report NSF-RA-5-74-020.
— (1982) Exploring the World of the Personal Computer. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc., Chapter 1.
(1988) Traffic reduction by telecommuting: a status review and selected bibliography. Transportation Research A 22A(4): 301–317.
Pisarski AE (1987) Commuting in America: A National Report on Commuting Patterns and Trends. Westport, CT: Eno Foundation for Transportation.
South Coast Air Quality Management District and Southern California Association of Governments (1989) 1989 Air Quality Management Plan. El Monte, CA
Telecommuting Research Institute, Inc. (1991) Telecommuting Forecasts. Los Angeles, CA: TRI.
Transportation Association of Southern California (1971) LARTS Base Year Report: 1967 Origin-Destination Survey. Los Angeles.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nilles, J.M. Telecommuting and urban sprawl: mitigator or inciter?. Transportation 18, 411–432 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00186567
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00186567