Abstract
For decisions (e.g. nuclear power development, environmental protection, genetic engineering) that may affect the probabilities of the continued survival of the human race, whether we should be very cautious or extremely cautious (defined as refusing to undertake anything that may reduce our survival probabilities) depends on whether our expected welfare is finite or infinite. If it is infinite, a paradox arises in the trade-off between our own expected welfare and that of future generations, since a small fraction (probability change) of infinity is still infinite. However, limitations on population size and average welfare suggest a finite expected welfare but the possibility of transforming our own selves perhaps by genetic engineering increases our expected welfare tremendously but still finite.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Chipman JS (1960) The foundation of utility. Econometrica 28: 193–224
Hawking SW (1988) A brief history of time. Bantam, London
Ng Y-K (1983a) Welfare economics: introduction and development of basic concepts, 2nd Edn., Macmillan, London
Ng Y-K (1983b) Some broader issues of social choice. In: Pattanaik PK, Salles M (eds). Social choice and welfare. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 151–174
Ng Y-K (1984) Expected subjective utility: Is the Neumann-Morgenstern utility the same as the Neoclassicals'? Soc Choice Welfare 1: 177–186
Ng Y-K (1986) On the welfare economics of population control. Popul Develop Rev 12: 247–266
Ng Y-K (1989) What should we do about future generations? The impossibility of Parfit's Theory X. Econ Philos 5: 135–253
Ng Y-K (1990) Utilitarianism and interpersonal comparison: some implications of a materialist solution to the world knot (typescript)
Ng Y-K (forthcoming) Welfarism and utilitarianism: a rehabilitation (Utilitas)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The author acknowledges the helpful comments of John Broome and Maurice Salles.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ng, YK. Should we be very cautious or extremely cautious on measures that may involve our destruction?. Soc Choice Welfare 8, 79–88 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00182449
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00182449