Abstract
This paper describes Mokken scale analysis as a method for assessing the unidimensionality of a set of items. As a nonparametric stochastic version of Guttman scale analysis, the Mokken model provides a useful starting point in scale construction since it does not impose severe restrictions on the functional form of the item trace lines. It requires only that the item trace lines are monotonically increasing and that they do not cross. After describing the Mokken method, we illustrate it by analyzing six abortion items from the 1975–1984 NORC General Social Surveys. In contrast to earlier parametric analyses of these items (regular and probit factor analyses), we find that these items form a single dimension. We argue that the two-dimension solution of these earlier analyses is an artifact of the differences in the difficulty of the items.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bohrnstedt, G.W. (1982). “Measurement”, pp. 69–121 in P.H. Rossi, J.D. Wright & A.B. Anderson, eds, Handbook of Survey Research. New York: Academic Press.
Christoffersson, A. (1975). “Factor analysis of dichotomized variables”, Psychometrika 40: 5–32.
Clogg, C.C. (1979). “Some latent structure models for the analysis of Likert-type data”. Social Science Research 8: 287–301.
Clogg, C.C. and Sawyer, D.O. (1981). “A comparison of alternative models for analyzing the scalability of response patterns”, pp. 240–280 in S. Leinhardt, ed., Sociological Methodology. London: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Davis, J.A. and Smith, T.W. (1984). General Social Surveys, 1972–1984: Cumulative code book. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.
Duncan, O.D., Sloane, D.B. and Brody, C. (1982). “Latent classes inferred from response-consistency effects”, pp. 19–64 in K.G. Joreskog and H. Wold, eds., Contribution to economic analysis. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co.
Goodman, L.A. (1975). A new model for scaling response patterns: An application of the quasi-independence concept”, Journal of the American Statistical Association 70: 755–768.
Goodman, L.A. (1978). Analyzing qualitative/categorical data: Log-linear models and latent structure analysis, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Abt Books.
Goodman, L.A. (1979). “The analysis of qualitative variables using more parsimonious quasi-independence models, scaling models, and the latent structures”, pp. 119–137 in R.K. Merton, J.S. Coleman and P.H. Rossi, eds., Qualitative and Quantitative Social Research: Papers in honor of Paul F. Lazarsfeld. New York: Free Press.
Goodman, L.A. (1984). The analysis of cross-classified data having ordered categories. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Guttman, L. (1950). “The basis for scalogram analysis”, pp. 60–90 in S. Stouffer, ed., Measurement and Prediction, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University.
Hattie, J. (1985). “Methodology review: Assessing unidimensionality of tests and items”. Applied Psychological Measurement 9: 139–164.
Hauser, R.M., Tsai, S.L. and Sewell, W.H. (1983). “A model of stratification with response error in social and psychological variables”, Sociology of Education 56: 20–46.
Jöreskog, K.G. (1982), “The lisrel approach to causal model-building in the social sciences”, pp. 81–99 in K.G. Jöreskog and H. Wold, eds, Systems Under Indirect Observation. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Kingma, J. and Reuvekamp, J. (1984). “The construction of a development scale for seriation”, Education and Psychological Measurement 44: 1–23.
Kingma, J. and Reuvekamp, J. (1986a). Mokken model: A Pascal program for nonparametric scaling. Educational and Psychological Measurement 46: 667–677.
Kingma, J. and Reuvekamp, J. (1986b). Mokken test for the robustness of nonparametric stochastic Mokken scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 46: 679–685.
Lippert, E., Schneider, P. and Wakenhut, R. (1978). “Die Verwendung der Skalierungsverfahren von Mokken and Rasch zur Uberprufung and Revision von Einstellungsskallen”, Diagnostica 24: 252–274.
Loevinger, J. (1947). “A systematic approach to construction and evaluation of tests of ability”, Psychological Monograph 61, (No. 4, Whole no. 285).
Loevinger, J. (1948). “The technique of homogeneous tests”, Psychological Bulletin 45: 507–529.
Lord, F.M. (1980). Applications of Items Response Theory to Practical Testing Problems. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
McDonald, R.P. (1982). “Linear versus nonlinear models in item response theory”, Applied Psychological Measurement 6: 379–396.
Mokken, R.J. (1969a). “Dutch-American comparisons of the ‘sense of political efficacy’”, Quality and Quantity 3: 125–152.
Mokken, R.J. (1969b). “Dutch-American comparisons of the ‘sense of political efficacy:’ Some remarks on cross-cultural robustness of scales”, Acta Politica 4: 425–448.
Mokken, R.J. (1971). A Theory and Procedure of Scale Analysis. The Hague: Mouton.
Mokken, R.J. and Lewis, C. (1982). “A nonparametric approach to the analysis of dichotomous item responses”, Applied Psychological Measurement 6: 417–430.
Molenaar, I.V. (1982). “Een tweede weging van de Mokkenschaal” (Another weighing of the Mokken scaling procedure), Tydschrift voor Onderwijsresearch 7: 172–181.
Mooijaart, A. (1982). “Latent structure analysis for categorical variables”, pp. 77–95 in K.G. Jöreskog and H. Wold, eds., Systems Under Indirect Observation. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Muthen, B. (1978). “Contributions to factor analysis of dichotomous variables”, Psychometrika 43: 551–560.
Muthen, B. (1979). “A structural probit model with latent variables”, Journal of the American Statistical Association 74: 807–811.
Muthen, B. (1982). “Some categorical response models with continuous latent variables”, pp. 65–79 in K.G. Jöreskog and H. Wold, eds, Systems Under Indirect Observation. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Niemöller, B., VanSchuur, W.H. and Stokman, F.N. (1980). Stap User's Manual: Stochastic Cummulative Scaling, Vol. 4. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
Nunally, J.M. (1978). Psychometric Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.
Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Denmarks paedagogiske Institut.
Stinchcombe, A.L. (1983). “Linearity in log-linear analysis”, pp. 104–125 in S. Leinhardt, ed., Sociological Methodology, 1983–1984. London: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Stokman, F.N. (1977). Roll calls and sponsorships, a methodological analysis of the third world group formation in the United Nations. Leiden: Sijthof.
Stokman, F. and Van Schuur, W. (1980). “Basic scaling”, Quality and Quantity 14: 5–30.
Ten Berge, J. (1972). “Difficulty factors, distribution effects, and the least squares data matrix solution”, Educational and Psychological Measurement 32: 911–920.
Wright, B.D. and Stone, M.H. (1979). Best Test Design. Chicago: MESA press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gillespie, M., Tenvergert, E.M. & Kingma, J. Using Mokken scale analysis to develop unidimensional scales. Qual Quant 21, 393–408 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00172565
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00172565